秋田预测市场 · Discord 审计

巴黎6月4日高温市场因规则歧义引发结算争议

2026-06-05 · Polymarket · 20 条相关讨论

stefizii 2026-06-05 14:58:42

Hi, can someone explain the resolution on the Paris June 4 high temp market? The rules say resolution source = Wunderground LFPB. That page now shows Actual High = 20°C for June 4. But the market resolved to 22°C, with 21°C and 20°C marked as losing (despite $55k and $23k volume on them). Market: https://polymarket.com/event/highest-temperature-in-paris-on-june-4-2026 Source: https://www.wunderground.com/history/daily/fr/bonneuil-en-france/LFPB How does this match the written rules?

Hi, can someone explain the resolution on the Paris June 4 high temp market? The rules say resolution source = Wunderground LFPB. That page now shows Actual High = 20°C for June 4. But the market resolved to 22°C, with 21°C and 20°C marked as losing (despite $55k and $23k volume on them). Market: https://polymarket.com/event/highest-temperature-in-paris-on-june-4-2026 Source: https://www.wunderground.com/history/daily/fr/bonneuil-en-france/LFPB How does this match the written rules?

diesel power 2026-06-05 14:59:17

I recommend asking in https://discord.com/channels/710897173927297116/1478933105262858321

I recommend asking in https://discord.com/channels/710897173927297116/1478933105262858321

stefizii 2026-06-05 14:59:32

Hi, can someone explain the resolution on the Paris June 4 high temp market? The rules say resolution source = Wunderground LFPB. That page now shows Actual High = 20°C for June 4. But the market resolved to 22°C, with 21°C and 20°C marked as losing (despite $55k and $23k volume on them). Market: https://polymarket.com/event/highest-temperature-in-paris-on-june-4-2026 Source: https://www.wunderground.com/history/daily/fr/bonneuil-en-france/LFPB How does this match the written rules?

Hi, can someone explain the resolution on the Paris June 4 high temp market? The rules say resolution source = Wunderground LFPB. That page now shows Actual High = 20°C for June 4. But the market resolved to 22°C, with 21°C and 20°C marked as losing (despite $55k and $23k volume on them). Market: https://polymarket.com/event/highest-temperature-in-paris-on-june-4-2026 Source: https://www.wunderground.com/history/daily/fr/bonneuil-en-france/LFPB How does this match the written rules?

stefizii 2026-06-05 15:03:44

Okay, but nobody's responding.

Okay, but nobody's responding.

Modali 2026-06-05 15:18:17

I see 22C on the history tab.

I see 22C on the history tab.

stefizii 2026-06-05 15:22:35

Thanks @Modali, but that's the hourly chart showing an instantaneous 22°C spike at 2:30 PM. The Almanac section on the SAME page now shows: - Actual High: 20°C - Average: 22°C (this is the 30-year climatology, not the observation) The Almanac is Wunderground's QC-validated daily max. The hourly chart can include unfiltered instantaneous readings. Which one is the resolution source? If it's the hourly spike, the rules should say so explicitly. As written they just point to the LFPB history page without specifying which section. Also the market resolved at 22:38 UTC on June 4 - before Wunderground had finalized the Actual. That timing means the resolution couldn't have used the Almanac (which only finalized overnight).

Thanks @Modali, but that's the hourly chart showing an instantaneous 22°C spike at 2:30 PM. The Almanac section on the SAME page now shows: - Actual High: 20°C - Average: 22°C (this is the 30-year climatology, not the observation) The Almanac is Wunderground's QC-validated daily max. The hourly chart can include unfiltered instantaneous readings. Which one is the resolution source? If it's the hourly spike, the rules should say so explicitly. As written they just point to the LFPB history page without specifying which section. Also the market resolved at 22:38 UTC on June 4 - before Wunderground had finalized the Actual. That timing means the resolution couldn't have used the Almanac (which only finalized overnight).

Yato 2026-06-05 15:23:24

Ye but look the summary says high 22 so 22 is the answer

Ye but look the summary says high 22 so 22 is the answer

Modali 2026-06-05 15:24:25

Rules basically says history tab. Not today page.

Rules basically says history tab. Not today page.

Modali 2026-06-05 15:27:29

Just use the link in the rules

Just use the link in the rules

Modali 2026-06-05 15:28:04

Can you send me the link for this?

Can you send me the link for this?

Modali 2026-06-05 15:28:19

This is not the same page you’ve provided the link

This is not the same page you’ve provided the link

Modali 2026-06-05 15:28:56

When I click the link you provided it just lands me to chart, not almanac.

When I click the link you provided it just lands me to chart, not almanac.

stefizii 2026-06-05 15:33:03

Yes the Summary says 22, but the Almanac on the same page says Actual 20. So Wunderground itself shows two different Actual values for June 4 on the same URL. The rules just point to the page without specifying which section is binding. If Summary is the source, then "Almanac" is misleading and the rules should explicitly say to use the Summary section. If Almanac is the source, the resolution is wrong. This is a genuine ambiguity in the rules. Multiple traders made decisions based on the Almanac reading.

Yes the Summary says 22, but the Almanac on the same page says Actual 20. So Wunderground itself shows two different Actual values for June 4 on the same URL. The rules just point to the page without specifying which section is binding. If Summary is the source, then "Almanac" is misleading and the rules should explicitly say to use the Summary section. If Almanac is the source, the resolution is wrong. This is a genuine ambiguity in the rules. Multiple traders made decisions based on the Almanac reading.

Modali 2026-06-05 15:33:26

Almanac is not on the same page. We’re not using that page.

Almanac is not on the same page. We’re not using that page.

Modali 2026-06-05 15:33:42

Almanac is on today page

Almanac is on today page

Modali 2026-06-05 15:35:01

If you click some other sections, that’s another page.

If you click some other sections, that’s another page.

Modali 2026-06-05 15:35:58

Here you can see it’s different links and first one is in the rules. https://www.wunderground.com/history/daily/fr/bonneuil-en-france https://www.wunderground.com/weather/fr/bonneuil-en-france

Here you can see it’s different links and first one is in the rules. https://www.wunderground.com/history/daily/fr/bonneuil-en-france https://www.wunderground.com/weather/fr/bonneuil-en-france

stefizii 2026-06-05 15:37:45

Got it, thanks for the clarification. I was checking the Today page Almanac yesterday evening, not the History page Summary. My mistake on the source. Resolution makes sense given the Summary shows Actual 22 on the page in the rules. Sorry for the noise.

Got it, thanks for the clarification. I was checking the Today page Almanac yesterday evening, not the History page Summary. My mistake on the source. Resolution makes sense given the Summary shows Actual 22 on the page in the rules. Sorry for the noise.

Modali 2026-06-05 15:38:39

You’re right about that. Wunderground is complicated a little bit. But we get used to it.

You’re right about that. Wunderground is complicated a little bit. But we get used to it.