Tina Fey 现身 NBA 总决赛 G4 的市场裁决争议

https://www.plzjake.com/markets/what-will-trump-saying-during-his-tele-rally-for-burt-jones-2026-06-12 -- from twitter

https://www.plzjake.com/markets/what-will-trump-saying-during-his-tele-rally-for-burt-jones-2026-06-12 -- from twitter

That's weird I don't see "I'm pretty sure that's her in the crowd" on the source agency list

That's weird I don't see "I'm pretty sure that's her in the crowd" on the source agency list

I already cashed out of Tina Y but I just put up 10k contracts if anyone wants to bond me 🙂

I already cashed out of Tina Y but I just put up 10k contracts if anyone wants to bond me 🙂

If the source agency shows Tina Fey in the picture, they reported it. They don’t have to say “Oh look it’s Tina Fey”. Even if they say that, their claim is valid as ours. But Tina Fey is definitely pictured. GG

If the source agency shows Tina Fey in the picture, they reported it. They don’t have to say “Oh look it’s Tina Fey”. Even if they say that, their claim is valid as ours. But Tina Fey is definitely pictured. GG

Hey guys I found a lanky white guy in this screenshot of the crowd that looks like Pete Davidson can we rule this Y already

Hey guys I found a lanky white guy in this screenshot of the crowd that looks like Pete Davidson can we rule this Y already

Nobody is saying "I'm pretty sure", I'm saying "that's fcking Tina fey", that's the same necklace she wore g3 and she met up with Tracy Morgan on the court after the game because they're friends. Zero doubt in my mind

Nobody is saying "I'm pretty sure", I'm saying "that's fcking Tina fey", that's the same necklace she wore g3 and she met up with Tracy Morgan on the court after the game because they're friends. Zero doubt in my mind

Bro if you have zero doubt just bond

Bro if you have zero doubt just bond

zero doubt its tina fey is not the same thing as zero doubt kalshi resolves this correctly what is so hard to understand about this??

zero doubt its tina fey is not the same thing as zero doubt kalshi resolves this correctly what is so hard to understand about this??

I'm just saying we have rules for a reason, so that we have something that can be used to rule this in the case of uncertainty

I'm just saying we have rules for a reason, so that we have something that can be used to rule this in the case of uncertainty

Sure, but this isn't uncertain imo. That's Tina fey

Sure, but this isn't uncertain imo. That's Tina fey

If I had that Jake "don't rely on precedent " pic I'd post it

If I had that Jake "don't rely on precedent " pic I'd post it

Part of the reason we do celebrities for this market is because we know what they look like

Part of the reason we do celebrities for this market is because we know what they look like

And because they get reported on

And because they get reported on

I'm sorry you're face blind

I'm sorry you're face blind

Ok now that the time has expired I can admit

Ok now that the time has expired I can admit

I’m Asian and even I can distinguish Tina Fey from white women.

I’m Asian and even I can distinguish Tina Fey from white women.

I’m disappointed that White People of all People can’t see the difference among White Women.

I’m disappointed that White People of all People can’t see the difference among White Women.

Just a handful of face blind people in here. Market knows it's her just very slightly uncertain on proof standard for resolution

Just a handful of face blind people in here. Market knows it's her just very slightly uncertain on proof standard for resolution

Anyways even besides the ambiguity as to whether we can say that some woman who looks vaguely like Tina Fey is her, if we pretend that the rules mean anything at all here I don't see how it can rule as yes

Anyways even besides the ambiguity as to whether we can say that some woman who looks vaguely like Tina Fey is her, if we pretend that the rules mean anything at all here I don't see how it can rule as yes

A majority are telling you it 100% is her

A majority are telling you it 100% is her