秋田预测市场 · Discord 审计

Rodgers签约钢人后“Next Team”市场遭Kalshi拒绝结算

2026-06-13 · Kalshi · 17 条相关讨论

Frib 2026-06-13 05:17:13

We should payout Rodgers next team

We should payout Rodgers next team

ѕησωу∂яαgση 2026-06-13 05:25:29

at the moment, it seems Kalshi is refusing to acknowledge the Steelers's contract w/ him

at the moment, it seems Kalshi is refusing to acknowledge the Steelers's contract w/ him

Nate 2026-06-13 05:28:49

willy was in here the other day confirming that re-signing with last team doesn't qualify

willy was in here the other day confirming that re-signing with last team doesn't qualify

Mitchieboi 2026-06-13 05:28:59

He was a free agent

He was a free agent

Nate 2026-06-13 05:29:06

but new contract doesn't win it according to kalshi

but new contract doesn't win it according to kalshi

Mitchieboi 2026-06-13 05:29:38

The rules literally say that signing a contract is sufficient

The rules literally say that signing a contract is sufficient

Mitchieboi 2026-06-13 05:29:48

If he had signed with the cardinals that would've paid out instantly

If he had signed with the cardinals that would've paid out instantly

ѕησωу∂яαgση 2026-06-13 05:29:49

I'd argue that if the contract is not enough to pay now, why should it be enough to pay on 12/1?

I'd argue that if the contract is not enough to pay now, why should it be enough to pay on 12/1?

Mitchieboi 2026-06-13 05:31:16

Are we sure "willy" hasn't been replaced by an impostor

Are we sure "willy" hasn't been replaced by an impostor

ѕησωу∂яαgση 2026-06-13 05:32:15

i still firmly believe it should be resolved tho

i still firmly believe it should be resolved tho

TSP 2026-06-13 05:32:26

I personally trust the Kalshit team to do what's best

I personally trust the Kalshit team to do what's best

Nate 2026-06-13 05:37:19

i'm sure they acknowledge the contract but believe a new contract with his former team doesn't meet the "new team" part of the rules. I disagree with this interpretation but i think that's the angle

i'm sure they acknowledge the contract but believe a new contract with his former team doesn't meet the "new team" part of the rules. I disagree with this interpretation but i think that's the angle

ѕησωу∂яαgση 2026-06-13 05:37:46

but their own strike is not formatted the same as the <same team> strikes

but their own strike is not formatted the same as the <same team> strikes

Nate 2026-06-13 05:38:17

i know, its dumb and should qualify based on any reasonable interpretation of the rules

i know, its dumb and should qualify based on any reasonable interpretation of the rules

Nate 2026-06-13 05:38:38

i'm just saying i think its getting hung up on "new team" language not denying the existence of the new contract

i'm just saying i think its getting hung up on "new team" language not denying the existence of the new contract

ѕησωу∂яαgση 2026-06-13 12:34:44

Tldr is there's a market on Aaron Rodgers' Next Team, opened 5/4 when he was not a Steeler anymore He signed with Steelers 5/18 Kalshi is refusing to acknowledge the Steelers' contract/transaction with him and/or that makes the Steelers his next team under contract Payout criterion

Tldr is there's a market on Aaron Rodgers' Next Team, opened 5/4 when he was not a Steeler anymore He signed with Steelers 5/18 Kalshi is refusing to acknowledge the Steelers' contract/transaction with him and/or that makes the Steelers his next team under contract Payout criterion