After the latest update, the 0.001 tick size seems to enable too early when a market only briefly trades above 96c. It used to feel good enough over the last few days before the update, but now these tiny price levels can appear and disappear too quickly.
Sometimes the price spikes above 96c for a short moment, then drops back to around the 50s, but the orderbook is already filled with many tiny bid/ask levels with very low volume on each row. For example, if the UI only shows around 8 rows at a time, levels like 54.1, 54.2, 54.3, etc. can take up most of the visible book and push the more meaningful price levels out of view. This makes it harder to understand the overall market picture, especially when the market has not really settled yet.
It also makes order placement harder for both manual UI users and API/tool users, because the valid price levels change too fast during active markets. Could the team consider requiring the market to stay above 96c for a longer period before switching from 0.01 to 0.001?
After the latest update, the 0.001 tick size seems to enable too early when a market only briefly trades above 96c. It used to feel good enough over the last few days before the update, but now these tiny price levels can appear and disappear too quickly.
Sometimes the price spikes above 96c for a short moment, then drops back to around the 50s, but the orderbook is already filled with many tiny bid/ask levels with very low volume on each row. For example, if the UI only shows around 8 rows at a time, levels like 54.1, 54.2, 54.3, etc. can take up most of the visible book and push the more meaningful price levels out of view. This makes it harder to understand the overall market picture, especially when the market has not really settled yet.
It also makes order placement harder for both manual UI users and API/tool users, because the valid price levels change too fast during active markets. Could the team consider requiring the market to stay above 96c for a longer period before switching from 0.01 to 0.001?
Hi,
After the latest update, the 0.001 tick size seems to enable too early when a market only briefly trades above 96c. It used to feel good enough over the last few days before the update, but now these tiny price levels can appear and disappear too quickly.
Sometimes the price spikes above 96c for a short moment, then drops back to around the 50s, but the orderbook is already filled with many tiny bid/ask levels with very low volume on each row. For example, if the UI only shows around 8 rows at a time, levels like 54.1, 54.2, 54.3, etc. can take up most of the visible book and push the more meaningful price levels out of view. This makes it harder to understand the overall market picture, especially when the market has not really settled yet.
It also makes order placement harder for both manual UI users and API/tool users, because the valid price levels change too fast during active markets. Could the team consider requiring the market to stay above 96c for a longer period before switching from 0.01 to 0.001?
Hi,
After the latest update, the 0.001 tick size seems to enable too early when a market only briefly trades above 96c. It used to feel good enough over the last few days before the update, but now these tiny price levels can appear and disappear too quickly.
Sometimes the price spikes above 96c for a short moment, then drops back to around the 50s, but the orderbook is already filled with many tiny bid/ask levels with very low volume on each row. For example, if the UI only shows around 8 rows at a time, levels like 54.1, 54.2, 54.3, etc. can take up most of the visible book and push the more meaningful price levels out of view. This makes it harder to understand the overall market picture, especially when the market has not really settled yet.
It also makes order placement harder for both manual UI users and API/tool users, because the valid price levels change too fast during active markets. Could the team consider requiring the market to stay above 96c for a longer period before switching from 0.01 to 0.001?
Could you please change tick_size change(0.01-0.001) time back to longer? Why do we keep making changes? The website is already so slow and there's not enough time left. It's so difficult to operate.
Could you please change tick_size change(0.01-0.001) time back to longer? Why do we keep making changes? The website is already so slow and there's not enough time left. It's so difficult to operate.