but tbh now i don't bother with juggling with 10 models. i just use gpt 5.5 high and never run out of usage on the pro plan
but tbh now i don't bother with juggling with 10 models. i just use gpt 5.5 high and never run out of usage on the pro plan
2026-06-23 · Polymarket · 51 条相关讨论
but tbh now i don't bother with juggling with 10 models. i just use gpt 5.5 high and never run out of usage on the pro plan
but tbh now i don't bother with juggling with 10 models. i just use gpt 5.5 high and never run out of usage on the pro plan
it's much less sloppy than claude
it's much less sloppy than claude
literally i hit limit on claude daily
literally i hit limit on claude daily
pro
pro
oh yeah its not visible on UI
oh yeah its not visible on UI
jeez wtf r u doing to reach limits daily
jeez wtf r u doing to reach limits daily
i have only been using claude, i was ok with opus 4.8, but after trying fable, it feels like a retarded version...
i have only been using claude, i was ok with opus 4.8, but after trying fable, it feels like a retarded version...
how much better is gpt 5.5?
how much better is gpt 5.5?
Well it’s kinda impossible to quantify but in my experience muchhhhh better than 4.8 and codex cli is less bloated and shitty than Claude code
Well it’s kinda impossible to quantify but in my experience muchhhhh better than 4.8 and codex cli is less bloated and shitty than Claude code
imo claude smokes gpt anyday
imo claude smokes gpt anyday
for now i believe gpt 5.5 is better now by far claude allocated most of it's infra and resources to fable so opus is less performant ( that's why it's retarded , it has less resources than it had before )
for now i believe gpt 5.5 is better now by far claude allocated most of it's infra and resources to fable so opus is less performant ( that's why it's retarded , it has less resources than it had before )
source?
source?
AI models often appear less performant over time due to cost-cutting in production, "stealth updates" to safety or behavior guidelines, and shifting user expectations. When new, more powerful models are released, developers may alter older models to save on computing power, or simply re-calibrate their standards because they are comparing old models against newer, more capable ones. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/yes-ai-models-can-get-worse-over-time/
AI models often appear less performant over time due to cost-cutting in production, "stealth updates" to safety or behavior guidelines, and shifting user expectations. When new, more powerful models are released, developers may alter older models to save on computing power, or simply re-calibrate their standards because they are comparing old models against newer, more capable ones. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/yes-ai-models-can-get-worse-over-time/
the main issue when anthropic is that they use 3 types of gpu to serve their models and they just can't do it properly
the main issue when anthropic is that they use 3 types of gpu to serve their models and they just can't do it properly
when you use 4.8 on bedrock it's MUCH better
when you use 4.8 on bedrock it's MUCH better
Oh I see, Bedrock is an exclusive aws cluster, so Claude only runs on those servers and they supposedly have only one type of gpu?
Oh I see, Bedrock is an exclusive aws cluster, so Claude only runs on those servers and they supposedly have only one type of gpu?
Hmm, according to ai they also have multiple types of gpus
Hmm, according to ai they also have multiple types of gpus
So it should not be better then
So it should not be better then
Yeah but I'm pretty sure 1. they have a much more robust system 2. you do not jump between gpu types mid session (my experience)
Yeah but I'm pretty sure 1. they have a much more robust system 2. you do not jump between gpu types mid session (my experience)
we did pretty extensive testing for smth unrelated to poly and the difference was clear
we did pretty extensive testing for smth unrelated to poly and the difference was clear