dont bet on tier C games I guess
dont bet on tier C games I guess
2026-06-28 · Polymarket · 16 条相关讨论
dont bet on tier C games I guess
dont bet on tier C games I guess
We had this discussion a million times
We had this discussion a million times
best option is refund but poly wont do that so just dont bet a lot of money on tier 3 potato cs
best option is refund but poly wont do that so just dont bet a lot of money on tier 3 potato cs
https://polymarket.com/esports/cs2/cct-south-america/cs2-vsc-red7-2026-06-27 Match was cancelled all markets resolve 50-50
https://polymarket.com/esports/cs2/cct-south-america/cs2-vsc-red7-2026-06-27 Match was cancelled all markets resolve 50-50
We do care and are actively working on solutions. Come August this will hopefully be solved. In the meantime if you don’t want to risk it, avoid C tier CS2
We do care and are actively working on solutions. Come August this will hopefully be solved. In the meantime if you don’t want to risk it, avoid C tier CS2
Hi everyone, I have a question about sports market settlement. Is there any way to get the actual match status through the API or WebSocket? Specifically, I’d like to know when a match has been canceled, forfeited, or one of the participants didn’t show up, resulting in a 50/50 settlement. Right now, the only way I can detect this is by watching the odds. If they move to 50/50, I assume the market will be refunded. Is there a proper way to identify this event programmatically? Also, I’ve noticed that sometimes it’s still possible to place bets on a match that has already effectively ended (for example, due to a forfeit or no-show), before the market is suspended. Why does this happen? Is there any way to detect or avoid this situation through the API/WebSocket? Thanks!
Hi everyone, I have a question about sports market settlement. Is there any way to get the actual match status through the API or WebSocket? Specifically, I’d like to know when a match has been canceled, forfeited, or one of the participants didn’t show up, resulting in a 50/50 settlement. Right now, the only way I can detect this is by watching the odds. If they move to 50/50, I assume the market will be refunded. Is there a proper way to identify this event programmatically? Also, I’ve noticed that sometimes it’s still possible to place bets on a match that has already effectively ended (for example, due to a forfeit or no-show), before the market is suspended. Why does this happen? Is there any way to detect or avoid this situation through the API/WebSocket? Thanks!
https://polymarket.com/zh/esports/cs2/cct-europe/cs2-mis-wampir-2026-06-27 need 50-50 ff resoly
https://polymarket.com/zh/esports/cs2/cct-europe/cs2-mis-wampir-2026-06-27 need 50-50 ff resoly
still needs resolve its 50-50 source on hltv https://www.hltv.org/matches/2395554/-
still needs resolve its 50-50 source on hltv https://www.hltv.org/matches/2395554/-
You can probably check the umaResolutionStatus and the token prices. Usually the umaResolutionStatus goes to `resolved` once you can redeem your shares for cash, not sure what happens in the event of a cancellation though
You can probably check the umaResolutionStatus and the token prices. Usually the umaResolutionStatus goes to `resolved` once you can redeem your shares for cash, not sure what happens in the event of a cancellation though
Now many CSGO teams intentionally forfeit matches, and settling the market with a 50-50 split is extremely unfair. They buy high-odds positions and then forfeit matches to easily win prize money. The game never even takes place—why should the stakes be split evenly? Shouldn’t all original wagers be refunded instead? I believe this is a serious problem. Anyone with insider information is guaranteed to make money, which means most ordinary users will end up losing money. I think everyone should join me in raising this issue so that improvements can be made. Because this is no longer a matter of winning or losing—it’s a situation where you’re bound to lose. This isn’t gambling; it’s a trap.
Now many CSGO teams intentionally forfeit matches, and settling the market with a 50-50 split is extremely unfair. They buy high-odds positions and then forfeit matches to easily win prize money. The game never even takes place—why should the stakes be split evenly? Shouldn’t all original wagers be refunded instead? I believe this is a serious problem. Anyone with insider information is guaranteed to make money, which means most ordinary users will end up losing money. I think everyone should join me in raising this issue so that improvements can be made. Because this is no longer a matter of winning or losing—it’s a situation where you’re bound to lose. This isn’t gambling; it’s a trap.
just dont bet in tier 3
just dont bet in tier 3
too much people buy bsta on 1.3 settling the market with a 50-50 split is extremely unfair.
too much people buy bsta on 1.3 settling the market with a 50-50 split is extremely unfair.
What they want to do is rip off users, and that's the predatory culture at Polymarket.
What they want to do is rip off users, and that's the predatory culture at Polymarket.
Now many CSGO teams intentionally forfeit matches, and settling the market with a 50-50 split is extremely unfair. They buy high-odds positions and then forfeit matches to easily win prize money. The game never even takes place—why should the stakes be split evenly? Shouldn’t all original wagers be refunded instead? I believe this is a serious problem. Anyone with insider information is guaranteed to make money, which means most ordinary users will end up losing money. I think everyone should join me in raising this issue so that improvements can be made. Because this is no longer a matter of winning or losing—it’s a situation where you’re bound to lose. This isn’t gambling; it’s a trap.
Now many CSGO teams intentionally forfeit matches, and settling the market with a 50-50 split is extremely unfair. They buy high-odds positions and then forfeit matches to easily win prize money. The game never even takes place—why should the stakes be split evenly? Shouldn’t all original wagers be refunded instead? I believe this is a serious problem. Anyone with insider information is guaranteed to make money, which means most ordinary users will end up losing money. I think everyone should join me in raising this issue so that improvements can be made. Because this is no longer a matter of winning or losing—it’s a situation where you’re bound to lose. This isn’t gambling; it’s a trap.
Now many CSGO teams intentionally forfeit matches, and settling the market with a 50-50 split is extremely unfair. They buy high-odds positions and then forfeit matches to easily win prize money. The game never even takes place—why should the stakes be split evenly? Shouldn’t all original wagers be refunded instead? I believe this is a serious problem. Anyone with insider information is guaranteed to make money, which means most ordinary users will end up losing money. I think everyone should join me in raising this issue so that improvements can be made. Because this is no longer a matter of winning or losing—it’s a situation where you’re bound to lose. This isn’t gambling; it’s a trap.
Now many CSGO teams intentionally forfeit matches, and settling the market with a 50-50 split is extremely unfair. They buy high-odds positions and then forfeit matches to easily win prize money. The game never even takes place—why should the stakes be split evenly? Shouldn’t all original wagers be refunded instead? I believe this is a serious problem. Anyone with insider information is guaranteed to make money, which means most ordinary users will end up losing money. I think everyone should join me in raising this issue so that improvements can be made. Because this is no longer a matter of winning or losing—it’s a situation where you’re bound to lose. This isn’t gambling; it’s a trap.
True, some insider placing bet on the bigger odds team. Then cashout when 50-50 settled
True, some insider placing bet on the bigger odds team. Then cashout when 50-50 settled