秋田预测市场 · Discord 审计

Limitless AMM暂停引发订单模型争议

2026-07-09 · Limitless · 6 条相关讨论

Jeremy | Limitless 2026-07-09 03:44:56

They are paused at the moment. I do not know the timeline for their return, but they will be back.

They are paused at the moment. I do not know the timeline for their return, but they will be back.

wil 2026-07-09 03:45:38

i hope they stay AMM when they comeback

i hope they stay AMM when they comeback

HAHAHAHA 2026-07-09 04:22:19

noo please keep it clob

noo please keep it clob

Dan 2026-07-09 16:30:18

I really think that AMMs are the USP of Limitless. These are the only markets which have enough liquidity to trade anytime for a reasonable price and also solving the big issue of ghost fills still persistent on other prediction market platforms and providing a really good UX. At least for me, that's the main reason to prefer Limitless over Polymarket etc. Therefore, it would be too bad if they wouldn't come back at least as before the sudden removal. And it would be awesome to see some more AMM-based hourly markets for stocks (which are even more fun to trade than RWA perps where most of the onchain volume currently is) and shorter-term crypto markets (5m/15m/1h) as AMMs. But just my 2 cents 🙂

I really think that AMMs are the USP of Limitless. These are the only markets which have enough liquidity to trade anytime for a reasonable price and also solving the big issue of ghost fills still persistent on other prediction market platforms and providing a really good UX. At least for me, that's the main reason to prefer Limitless over Polymarket etc. Therefore, it would be too bad if they wouldn't come back at least as before the sudden removal. And it would be awesome to see some more AMM-based hourly markets for stocks (which are even more fun to trade than RWA perps where most of the onchain volume currently is) and shorter-term crypto markets (5m/15m/1h) as AMMs. But just my 2 cents 🙂

필요 2026-07-09 17:50:37

The AMM order model will only reduce the number of market makers. If you're willing to pay the company to provide AMM orders, then sure, that's an option. You're just looking at this from the perspective of your own interests.

The AMM order model will only reduce the number of market makers. If you're willing to pay the company to provide AMM orders, then sure, that's an option. You're just looking at this from the perspective of your own interests.

busdrivaaa69 2026-07-09 19:01:39

Why would it reduce the number of market makers? CLOBs are existing alongside AMM and it doesn't seem like it would attract a lot of liquidity or even outcompete the AMM markets in terms of liquidity

Why would it reduce the number of market makers? CLOBs are existing alongside AMM and it doesn't seem like it would attract a lot of liquidity or even outcompete the AMM markets in terms of liquidity