<@897496055149625347> 刚才看了一下 你大部分订单存活时间只有2分钟左右 订单平均大小也只有几百shares左右 这两个点加起来让你很难被快照到
2026-07-15 · Predict · 20 条相关讨论
<@897496055149625347> 刚才看了一下 你大部分订单存活时间只有2分钟左右 订单平均大小也只有几百shares左右 这两个点加起来让你很难被快照到
不是高频快照吗 我还以为半分钟快照一次
15分钟快照一次
是1分钟随机一次 但你看我后面一句
而且系统不仅要每分钟快照所有用户在所有市场的订单，还要实时计算仓位，资产，撤单，资产转移等等
之前的数据库已经崩了
是的 这次因为还有一些遗留问题，周五晚上左右应该没问题
崩了不代表没记下来
不过他这样的用户我也挺心疼的 所以会加上被成交返利
我有一个解决办法，就是不知道你们技术上面难不难，给前三档价位之后增加一个积分分配上限，前三档无上限，这样就不会有往后面挂用资金量占取大积分却让前三档承担风险了
但是我29周挂单的各项数据都翻倍了，积分却减半了。我也参与了最后那一天cz币高分那个时间段
<@802217872993812572> 提个建议，可以考虑把流动性积分和其它积分分开统计
<@1175983422360015017> 这种很好查吧
他如果一直不成交，你咋知道他是幽灵单还是单纯运气好没成交<:FancyPepe:1280173107507761164>
本来就是分开的呀
it's total bullshit, all points are going to chineese community, yeon or something like that with 1k fees and 300k volume per week 500k points, every single week
it's total bullshit, all points are going to chineese community, yeon or something like that with 1k fees and 300k volume per week 500k points, every single week
<@802217872993812572> @dingaling tbh I haven't dug too deep into the points allocation yet, but here's my take: not all liquidity is equal. There's a big difference between liquidity that actually gets filled and liquidity that just sits in the book untouched. If someone's quotes are constantly getting hit, that's real liquidity — it's absorbing flow, tightening spreads, and making the market actually usable. Orders that sit far from the action and almost never fill are basically just decoration in the orderbook. So imo the rewards formula should include some kind of fill-based multiplier for makers — weight the points by how much of your provided liquidity actually gets taken, not just how much you post. Obviously the allocation details aren't fully public, so maybe something like this already exists — but if not, worth the team running the numbers. Rewarding filled liquidity over parked liquidity would push LPs toward quoting where it actually matters. I am also making market, I think around 500k+ weekly volume, getting around 60k+ PP. If someone making less volume and getting 300k+ PP, idk if this is "fair".
<@802217872993812572> @dingaling tbh I haven't dug too deep into the points allocation yet, but here's my take: not all liquidity is equal. There's a big difference between liquidity that actually gets filled and liquidity that just sits in the book untouched. If someone's quotes are constantly getting hit, that's real liquidity — it's absorbing flow, tightening spreads, and making the market actually usable. Orders that sit far from the action and almost never fill are basically just decoration in the orderbook. So imo the rewards formula should include some kind of fill-based multiplier for makers — weight the points by how much of your provided liquidity actually gets taken, not just how much you post. Obviously the allocation details aren't fully public, so maybe something like this already exists — but if not, worth the team running the numbers. Rewarding filled liquidity over parked liquidity would push LPs toward quoting where it actually matters. I am also making market, I think around 500k+ weekly volume, getting around 60k+ PP. If someone making less volume and getting 300k+ PP, idk if this is "fair".
> So imo the rewards formula should include some kind of fill-based multiplier for makers there already is
> So imo the rewards formula should include some kind of fill-based multiplier for makers there already is
My volume was 850k but I only got 4k points. I participated in the project for fun, without expecting a high score.
My volume was 850k but I only got 4k points. I participated in the project for fun, without expecting a high score.
also, we have this soon which should help with makers that get filled
also, we have this soon which should help with makers that get filled