Hey guys, let's say i want to build for myself a one to many copy trading strategy , how can i do that?
Like the feature of only tracking 10 wallet address is not enough.
Does tracking trades reliable? Are there any missing data from time to time ( because if a wallet exit, and i missed it, then i won't have the same performance )
How to do that reliably. Not looking for something very detailed, but just to understand the surface and go in the rigth direction
Hey guys, let's say i want to build for myself a one to many copy trading strategy , how can i do that?
Like the feature of only tracking 10 wallet address is not enough.
Does tracking trades reliable? Are there any missing data from time to time ( because if a wallet exit, and i missed it, then i won't have the same performance )
How to do that reliably. Not looking for something very detailed, but just to understand the surface and go in the rigth direction
imo, you want to track fills for the users.
you wouldn’t wanna subscribe to those users wallet, rather you should track node fills instead.
you can use third party service like hydromancer
and you just have your map[user] = bool
and if the fill contains your tracked user, you execute your action.
i think this is the simplest idea for it, there can be other logic tho
imo, you want to track fills for the users.
you wouldn’t wanna subscribe to those users wallet, rather you should track node fills instead.
you can use third party service like hydromancer
and you just have your map[user] = bool
and if the fill contains your tracked user, you execute your action.
i think this is the simplest idea for it, there can be other logic tho
are fills never missed by a non validator node? If they miss some, how do you usually recover?
are fills never missed by a non validator node? If they miss some, how do you usually recover?
hydromancer is reliable imo, so you’re good
hydromancer is reliable imo, so you’re good
non validator node doesnt miss fills, but your implementation might
non validator node doesnt miss fills, but your implementation might