Predict好
bencc参与话题 5消息总数 87
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 87 条，显示第 51-87 条一直挂着单，没有成交有积分没有的
vpn的问题
没错 就是最基础的倍数，这样能让玩家效率提升好几倍，购买和挂单欲望强烈很多。现在每次还要手动算，让很多玩家打退堂鼓
类似这样
小数显示大一些概率括号起来就好
能反馈增加左边这样的小数模式吗？对于玩家来说方便很多
概率能改成赔率吗？现在是非常不直观很繁琐
怎么把概率改成赔率啊每次都要手动输入看
PolymarketSaigon Dino clearly had the advantage in this match.
Saigon Dino clearly had the advantage in this match.
My English is very poor, I don't even know how to operate it. I really want to object, but I usually read based on translations.
My English is very poor, I don't even know how to operate it. I really want to object, but I usually read based on translations.
If I win, what will I get?
If I win, what will I get?
I'm not
I'm not
If no one makes the suggestion, I will. How should I make the suggestion?
If no one makes the suggestion, I will. How should I make the suggestion?
I would suggest 50/50
I would suggest 50/50
Dispute - Resolve 50-50 (NOT Saigon Warriors)According to Polymarket’s official rules for this Series Winner market:If the match begins but is not completed, or ends in a forfeit / walkover due to technical issues → resolve 50-50. Only when one team clearly wins due to normal forfeit after proper games may it go to the winner. Key Facts:Game 1 only lasted a few minutes before being paused due to Saigon Dino’s venue power / electrical system failure (hệ thống điện). Saigon Dino officially confirmed on Facebook it was due to objective technical problems at the venue. The match could not continue properly, resulting in a technical forfeit. The match was not properly completed. This falls under the market’s 50-50 clauses for incomplete matches and technical forfeits.Evidence:Official Saigon Dino statement (Facebook, June 10, 2026): “Vì một số lý do khách quan liên quan đến hệ thống điện tại địa điểm thi đấu, trận đấu buộc phải tạm dừng.” Match footage shows early interruption in Game 1. Direct alignment with Polymarket “not completed” and forfeit resolution rules
Dispute - Resolve 50-50 (NOT Saigon Warriors)According to Polymarket’s official rules for this Series Winner market:If the match begins but is not completed, or ends in a forfeit / walkover due to technical issues → resolve 50-50. Only when one team clearly wins due to normal forfeit after proper games may it go to the winner. Key Facts:Game 1 only lasted a few minutes before being paused due to Saigon Dino’s venue power / electrical system failure (hệ thống điện). Saigon Dino officially confirmed on Facebook it was due to objective technical problems at the venue. The match could not continue properly, resulting in a technical forfeit. The match was not properly completed. This falls under the market’s 50-50 clauses for incomplete matches and technical forfeits.Evidence:Official Saigon Dino statement (Facebook, June 10, 2026): “Vì một số lý do khách quan liên quan đến hệ thống điện tại địa điểm thi đấu, trận đấu buộc phải tạm dừng.” Match footage shows early interruption in Game 1. Direct alignment with Polymarket “not completed” and forfeit resolution rules
If you're so certain, you should buy all of SGW's holdings instead of denying that AI is useless. Do you dare?
If you're so certain, you should buy all of SGW's holdings instead of denying that AI is useless. Do you dare?
I simply let it objectively analyze the situation according to the rules of the polymarket, while you, holding positions, criticize AI here, saying it's useless. That's biased.
I simply let it objectively analyze the situation according to the rules of the polymarket, while you, holding positions, criticize AI here, saying it's useless. That's biased.
I consulted AI, and it gave me an objective response based on its rules, while your responses were merely biased. Don't even mention how much you'd transfer the money to me; even if the result were the opposite, you wouldn't transfer it. Arguing is pointless; I'm simply conveying the most objective analysis.
I consulted AI, and it gave me an objective response based on its rules, while your responses were merely biased. Don't even mention how much you'd transfer the money to me; even if the result were the opposite, you wouldn't transfer it. Arguing is pointless; I'm simply conveying the most objective analysis.
If the match ends with a forfeit, disqualification, or by default (the team withdraws before the match begins, and the other team automatically wins), the result of this betting line is 50-50.The rule is very clear: if a player forfeits before the match begins, the other player wins; if a player forfeits during the match for any reason, the score is 50/50.
If the match ends with a forfeit, disqualification, or by default (the team withdraws before the match begins, and the other team automatically wins), the result of this betting line is 50-50.The rule is very clear: if a player forfeits before the match begins, the other player wins; if a player forfeits during the match for any reason, the score is 50/50.
It's just that there are relatively fewer League of Legends players.
It's just that there are relatively fewer League of Legends players.
That happens too often. I bet on CS tournaments, and this situation occurs frequently. It's often 50/50.
That happens too often. I bet on CS tournaments, and this situation occurs frequently. It's often 50/50.
We don't entrust everything to AI; we just let it match rules based on existing patterns and past cases. It can tell us objectively. We, on the other hand, might be biased towards one side due to existing betting positions.
We don't entrust everything to AI; we just let it match rules based on existing patterns and past cases. It can tell us objectively. We, on the other hand, might be biased towards one side due to existing betting positions.
AI is simply providing an objective picture of the situation, based on the rules. You, however, are acting with emotion and bias. If you were so certain SGW would win, you could have simply bet on SGW. There's still a chance; are you willing to take it?
AI is simply providing an objective picture of the situation, based on the rules. You, however, are acting with emotion and bias. If you were so certain SGW would win, you could have simply bet on SGW. There's still a chance; are you willing to take it?
It can accurately and unbiasedly understand the rules and interpret them according to the context, while we ourselves are always nitpicking with emotional biases. I should trust it.
It can accurately and unbiasedly understand the rules and interpret them according to the context, while we ourselves are always nitpicking with emotional biases. I should trust it.
Your explanation is very accurate, based on the rules. I consulted the AI robot, and based on the rules and past cases, it should trigger a 50/50 response.
Your explanation is very accurate, based on the rules. I consulted the AI robot, and based on the rules and past cases, it should trigger a 50/50 response.
No, the official statement has already said it's over.
No, the official statement has already said it's over.
A friend told me that on traditional betting platforms, this match would have been treated as a forfeit, with the stakes refunded; it wasn't declared a victory for SGW. The low odds alone don't guarantee a win.
A friend told me that on traditional betting platforms, this match would have been treated as a forfeit, with the stakes refunded; it wasn't declared a victory for SGW. The low odds alone don't guarantee a win.
Bro, do you think it should be 50/50?
Bro, do you think it should be 50/50?
I think it's a 50/50 chance; too many CS matches have ended up with this kind of 50/50 result. I don't know why Dino's odds are so high.
I think it's a 50/50 chance; too many CS matches have ended up with this kind of 50/50 result. I don't know why Dino's odds are so high.
Do you mean SGW should be declared the winner of this match?
Do you mean SGW should be declared the winner of this match?
This is the AI's response after a complete analysis of the entire rule set and the current match situation; it's entirely based on the rules. This is the rules-related response.
This is the AI's response after a complete analysis of the entire rule set and the current match situation; it's entirely based on the rules. This is the rules-related response.
Brother, for whatever reason, it's written in the rules, and it wasn't finished. Is the game over? No, it's not.
Brother, for whatever reason, it's written in the rules, and it wasn't finished. Is the game over? No, it's not.
These are the rules I see: if the game is not completed for any reason, it's 50/50.
These are the rules I see: if the game is not completed for any reason, it's 50/50.
If Game X is not completed for any reason → resolve 50-50。 If the match is canceled (not played at all) or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without play beginning → resolve 50-50。 If Game X is never played due to forfeit, disqualification, or walkover → resolve 50-50。
If Game X is not completed for any reason → resolve 50-50。 If the match is canceled (not played at all) or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without play beginning → resolve 50-50。 If Game X is never played due to forfeit, disqualification, or walkover → resolve 50-50。
That's correct, I've read the rules.
That's correct, I've read the rules.
<@238266984297529345>The kill count option in League of Legends is a really fun feature, but many competitions don't have it. I hope it can be added. Thank you very much.
<@238266984297529345>The kill count option in League of Legends is a really fun feature, but many competitions don't have it. I hope it can be added. Thank you very much.
← 上一页
第 2 / 2 页