Polymarketjust add a conservative filter on top of what i just said, same outcome
just add a conservative filter on top of what i just said, same outcome
Kawa参与话题 7消息总数 1651
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 1651 条，显示第 951-1000 条but i dont think thats meaningful imo
but i dont think thats meaningful imo
u did get me there
u did get me there
thats an edge case
thats an edge case
https://tenor.com/view/point-at-you-point-you-thumbs-up-two-thumbs-up-gif-6261391895630358153
https://tenor.com/view/point-at-you-point-you-thumbs-up-two-thumbs-up-gif-6261391895630358153
the only way what ur saying could have merit is if the amount of orders increases while im inside it
the only way what ur saying could have merit is if the amount of orders increases while im inside it
how would they cancel behind me when its my shares that are last
how would they cancel behind me when its my shares that are last
and if it increases in size, i put those shares behind me
and if it increases in size, i put those shares behind me
gang say 40c has 100 shares, and my order is 10, now its 110 shares, if it decreases without a corresponding trade clearly that happend cuz of a cancel, and it clearly wasnt me that cancelled
gang say 40c has 100 shares, and my order is 10, now its 110 shares, if it decreases without a corresponding trade clearly that happend cuz of a cancel, and it clearly wasnt me that cancelled
idk why this is confusing to u guys
idk why this is confusing to u guys
update on changes that occur
update on changes that occur
u model by putting urself in at wtvr level, keep track of the shares ahead of u and behind u
u model by putting urself in at wtvr level, keep track of the shares ahead of u and behind u
yes?
yes?
im recording the websockets not the blockchain
im recording the websockets not the blockchain
if a limit order disappears without a corresponding trade thats a cancel
if a limit order disappears without a corresponding trade thats a cancel
cancels are blips bro
cancels are blips bro
i record every 100ms and event change
i record every 100ms and event change
instead of telling claude to backtest ur maker
instead of telling claude to backtest ur maker
like its very simple logic u just need to think it out fully
like its very simple logic u just need to think it out fully
estimating queu position is so easy too just put ur orders behind where other ppls was, cancels move u up, trades eating thru the book fill u
estimating queu position is so easy too just put ur orders behind where other ppls was, cancels move u up, trades eating thru the book fill u
1 to 1
1 to 1
my makers results were exactly the same as my backtest
my makers results were exactly the same as my backtest
yes u can bruh
yes u can bruh
and yeam boom
and yeam boom
thats cancels
thats cancels
some common sense, if a trade didnt happen but limit orders have shifted
some common sense, if a trade didnt happen but limit orders have shifted
then u just need like
then u just need like
and imo 100 levels of the bid and ask
and imo 100 levels of the bid and ask
u just need to record trade data
u just need to record trade data
yeah its easy
yeah its easy
modeling making isnt hard
modeling making isnt hard
anything else i'd bet on it being a non ml model
anything else i'd bet on it being a non ml model
if their win rate is like 50-60% i give it a coin flip on ml
if their win rate is like 50-60% i give it a coin flip on ml
u can
u can
other strats tho
other strats tho
ml = u can never reverse engineer it
ml = u can never reverse engineer it
its of my opinion that
its of my opinion that
it just takes a sharp mind and many months of toil
it just takes a sharp mind and many months of toil
u can
u can
theres literally thousands
theres literally thousands
u can never be out of technical literature to read
u can never be out of technical literature to read
prove me fucking wrong
prove me fucking wrong
yeah well prove me wrong sonderist
yeah well prove me wrong sonderist
when has tardis not been greedy
when has tardis not been greedy
be successful!
be successful!
yall can do it!
yall can do it!
im good!
im good!
im using so much that i will go broke getting that historical data
im using so much that i will go broke getting that historical data
and thats if ur using 1 data source for btc
and thats if ur using 1 data source for btc
getting data is hard enough, let alone regime awareness
getting data is hard enough, let alone regime awareness