Polymarketmaybe the heatwave is actually causing issues in eu-west
maybe the heatwave is actually causing issues in eu-west
Limit Buy Up Failed参与话题 3消息总数 116
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 116 条，显示第 1-50 条https://klipy.com/gifs/were-sorry-tony-hayward
https://klipy.com/gifs/were-sorry-tony-hayward
ok you're right
ok you're right
anything under 500 is extremely rare
anything under 500 is extremely rare
Isn't it like 800 usually - when it matters
Isn't it like 800 usually - when it matters
Hello, exit liquidity
Hello, exit liquidity
<@707597210845446214> thank you for moving the CLOB restart window into the morning
<@707597210845446214> thank you for moving the CLOB restart window into the morning
it can be inferred from the WS response messages and post latency though
it can be inferred from the WS response messages and post latency though
for FAK orders its obvious, for GTC orders without post_only its not
for FAK orders its obvious, for GTC orders without post_only its not
I am talking about the 250 ms taker delay
I am talking about the 250 ms taker delay
for sports markets or crypto up down?
for sports markets or crypto up down?
They should really add the delayed event to user_ws or am I doing something wrong for not receiving it?
They should really add the delayed event to user_ws or am I doing something wrong for not receiving it?
<@707597210845446214> what happens if the taker delay is applied but an order could fill as maker? Eg. price is 20c, one submits a GTC at 25c, (crosses book, 250 ms taker delay applied) then 50 ms later the ask prices in book fall to 20c (GTC resting order would have filled as maker) does the taker delay slow everything down? so its a missed opportunity?
<@707597210845446214> what happens if the taker delay is applied but an order could fill as maker? Eg. price is 20c, one submits a GTC at 25c, (crosses book, 250 ms taker delay applied) then 50 ms later the ask prices in book fall to 20c (GTC resting order would have filled as maker) does the taker delay slow everything down? so its a missed opportunity?
only hyperliquid could implement such fast markets
only hyperliquid could implement such fast markets
when they move from polygon ....
when they move from polygon ....
lmao absolute garbage spreads
lmao absolute garbage spreads
<@707597210845446214> when gold and spx 5 min markets
<@707597210845446214> when gold and spx 5 min markets
🤝
🤝
would be weird to use pyth for 2 things but chainlink for everything else
would be weird to use pyth for 2 things but chainlink for everything else
But would be cool since manipulating the gold or spx market would not happen to make 10k on polymarket
But would be cool since manipulating the gold or spx market would not happen to make 10k on polymarket
Does chainlink have an oracle for this? No oracle no 5 min market
Does chainlink have an oracle for this? No oracle no 5 min market
but if you try merging 5 shares every second you might have an issue
but if you try merging 5 shares every second you might have an issue
I think higher than this
I think higher than this
haven't noticed
haven't noticed
if you are not using FPGAs ngmi
if you are not using FPGAs ngmi
20 usd to use but the real price is giving away your strategy
20 usd to use but the real price is giving away your strategy
do they use a random generator to simulate a latency between 500 and 10 000 ms ? <:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251>
do they use a random generator to simulate a latency between 500 and 10 000 ms ? <:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251>
Maybe do not develop the bot you will surely lose money
Maybe do not develop the bot you will surely lose money
You are using a 4 month old version and CLOBv2 launched in May are you fucking kidding me
You are using a 4 month old version and CLOBv2 launched in May are you fucking kidding me
You do not need builder creds, you need to update your library
You do not need builder creds, you need to update your library
happens like 5 times per day, usually harmless, T=0 price would be up and T+1 price is up as well but sometimes it flips and then the T+1 payload is used to resolve the market
happens like 5 times per day, usually harmless, T=0 price would be up and T+1 price is up as well but sometimes it flips and then the T+1 payload is used to resolve the market
No, chainlink randomly does not publish the end of interval report
No, chainlink randomly does not publish the end of interval report
Just an assumption
Just an assumption
RTDS is down because chainlink is demanding 1M per month from polymarket if they want to relay
RTDS is down because chainlink is demanding 1M per month from polymarket if they want to relay
the fucked part is that it was 99c for down at the last 5 seconds then closed up ... from 2 bps bellow the open price to 2 bps above, 3 seconds without a published report, fucked
the fucked part is that it was 99c for down at the last 5 seconds then closed up ... from 2 bps bellow the open price to 2 bps above, 3 seconds without a published report, fucked
This one settled at 99c for down then it closed up
This one settled at 99c for down then it closed up
sol-updown-5m-1781193600
sol-updown-5m-1781193600
It was 2 bps bellow the open price at T=0 then it closed up 3 seconds later
It was 2 bps bellow the open price at T=0 then it closed up 3 seconds later
They did not publish sol-updown-5m-1781193600 at the ending, it was delayed 3 seconds ...
They did not publish sol-updown-5m-1781193600 at the ending, it was delayed 3 seconds ...
Price charts on crypto markets may be temporarily unavailable or inaccurate while we investigate an issue. Trading, orders, and positions are unaffected. Status Page for updates.
Price charts on crypto markets may be temporarily unavailable or inaccurate while we investigate an issue. Trading, orders, and positions are unaffected. Status Page for updates.
fees on both
fees on both
Seems like it's the thing where you lose money fees included but the PnL is positive on PM
Seems like it's the thing where you lose money fees included but the PnL is positive on PM
can someone recheck
can someone recheck
Anyone else unimpressed by Fable 5?
Anyone else unimpressed by Fable 5?
I feel like we are all just a bunch of beta testers
I feel like we are all just a bunch of beta testers
the airdrop better be good
the airdrop better be good
I wonder why
I wonder why
I wonder how many of the "updates" are just rollbacks
I wonder how many of the "updates" are just rollbacks
I compared may 25th to today/yesterday, may 25th was at worst the same, at best it was actually better
I compared may 25th to today/yesterday, may 25th was at worst the same, at best it was actually better
Claude, we need to vibe another batch of updates, make no mistakes
Claude, we need to vibe another batch of updates, make no mistakes
第 1 / 3 页
下一页 →