聊天记录
共 587 条,显示第 201-250 条
We have formal official US announcement of a diplomatic agreement under which the ceasefire will continue. This is what's needed
We have formal official US announcement of a diplomatic agreement under which the ceasefire will continue. This is what's needed
There is an agreement. All of the qualifying examples in rules are of diplomatic agreements (or unilateral proclamations of agreements) not of signed deals
There is an agreement. All of the qualifying examples in rules are of diplomatic agreements (or unilateral proclamations of agreements) not of signed deals
Yes ofc we made a unilateral announcement market that so that it'll only count once the deal is formally signed by iran and the usa
Yes ofc we made a unilateral announcement market that so that it'll only count once the deal is formally signed by iran and the usa
An official U.S. statement announcing that “the United States and Iran have agreed to extend the ceasefire framework while negotiations continue this is in the rules btw
An official U.S. statement announcing that “the United States and Iran have agreed to extend the ceasefire framework while negotiations continue this is in the rules btw
Yeah they can clarify early but no need
Yeah they can clarify early but no need
an announcement of an agreement to end the war that will be formally signed tomorrow is obviously far more qualifying than this example
an announcement of an agreement to end the war that will be formally signed tomorrow is obviously far more qualifying than this example
lmao
lmao
President Trump’s April 21, 2026 announcement extending the ceasefire “until the Iranian negotiators could reach a unified proposal. this is literally in the rules as a qualifying example
President Trump’s April 21, 2026 announcement extending the ceasefire “until the Iranian negotiators could reach a unified proposal. this is literally in the rules as a qualifying example
the rules include examples of unilateral truth announcements that were denied by iran so obviously the clarif cant be overriding the rules
the rules include examples of unilateral truth announcements that were denied by iran so obviously the clarif cant be overriding the rules
yeah theres so much smart money on no. obviously a qualifying announcement wont count because its at 95. i am a math genius
yeah theres so much smart money on no. obviously a qualifying announcement wont count because its at 95. i am a math genius
"pOly sAiD a TeLeRalLy SloGan woNt coUnt so oBvIousLy an OfFicIal aNNounCmenT woNt eiTheR"
"pOly sAiD a TeLeRalLy SloGan woNt coUnt so oBvIousLy an OfFicIal aNNounCmenT woNt eiTheR"
they didnt clarify against the announced agreement. if u think they did u misread
they didnt clarify against the announced agreement. if u think they did u misread
truth social
truth social
If u dont think trump announced a diplomatic agreement u need to download the hottest app around
If u dont think trump announced a diplomatic agreement u need to download the hottest app around
this will be proposed y later today. im gonna spend all day loading up shares and taking psychedelics to try to come up with a way poly can clarify this to not count
this will be proposed y later today. im gonna spend all day loading up shares and taking psychedelics to try to come up with a way poly can clarify this to not count
its not about a deal. its about trump unilaterally announcing an agreement
its not about a deal. its about trump unilaterally announcing an agreement
if an officially announced agreement is not enough then wtf is the point of the market
if an officially announced agreement is not enough then wtf is the point of the market
"was descriptive and informal in nature and do not qualify as an official announcement of U.S. policy either extending the ceasefire or officially announcing a new peace agreement." using our thinking caps, this clarif tells us that an official announcement of a new peace agreement qualifies
"was descriptive and informal in nature and do not qualify as an official announcement of U.S. policy either extending the ceasefire or officially announcing a new peace agreement." using our thinking caps, this clarif tells us that an official announcement of a new peace agreement qualifies
bro an agreement counts it doesnt have to specifically say the words ceasefire extend lol
bro an agreement counts it doesnt have to specifically say the words ceasefire extend lol
itd actually be mindblowing if this doesnt count for the market
itd actually be mindblowing if this doesnt count for the market
ppl genuinely think that "President Trump’s April 21, 2026 announcement extending the ceasefire “until the Iranian negotiators could reach a unified proposal.” qualifies but not Trump explicitly saying we have an agreement that will end the war
ppl genuinely think that "President Trump’s April 21, 2026 announcement extending the ceasefire “until the Iranian negotiators could reach a unified proposal.” qualifies but not Trump explicitly saying we have an agreement that will end the war
wdym there is no agreement
wdym there is no agreement
Trump literally said we have an agreement and it will be signed tomorrow
Trump literally said we have an agreement and it will be signed tomorrow
this has nothing to do with blockade lol
this has nothing to do with blockade lol
he clearly announced there is an agreement
he clearly announced there is an agreement
why it still at 5c
why it still at 5c
this is a scam of the ages
this is a scam of the ages
snowy deserves his money
snowy deserves his money
start fighting for it
start fighting for it
welcome to the club sj
welcome to the club sj
Bro wtf
Bro wtf
bec will be tricky if they leave open past resolution
bec will be tricky if they leave open past resolution
ye thats why theyre regarded for leaving open
ye thats why theyre regarded for leaving open
and wrong
and wrong
so every second they wait is dumb af
so every second they wait is dumb af
but will if they dont payout on time
but will if they dont payout on time
they dont owe anyone if he changes plans later
they dont owe anyone if he changes plans later
bec they are regarded
bec they are regarded
they will have to payout both sides
they will have to payout both sides
and they will be in big trouble if they wait and he changes team or something
and they will be in big trouble if they wait and he changes team or something
theyre scamming u
theyre scamming u
sry snowy
sry snowy
if they dont payout now theyre criminals
if they dont payout now theyre criminals
straight up
straight up
they scammers if they hold till dec 1st
they scammers if they hold till dec 1st
whats their reasoning to wait until midseason to pay it out
whats their reasoning to wait until midseason to pay it out
are they regarded
are they regarded
doesnt the season start before dec 1st 💀
doesnt the season start before dec 1st 💀
y
y
last batch of allah praise he did many in week so good chance it hits
last batch of allah praise he did many in week so good chance it hits