聊天记录
共 351 条，显示第 51-100 条
That’s what the status quo actually means btw this whole enrichment thing is totally made up and if you’re arguing disingenuously fair game but in terms of what it actually is as far as an Iranian concession it’s a commitment to not enrich beyond 60% or attempt a nuclear breakout
That’s what the status quo actually means btw this whole enrichment thing is totally made up and if you’re arguing disingenuously fair game but in terms of what it actually is as far as an Iranian concession it’s a commitment to not enrich beyond 60% or attempt a nuclear breakout
Not proliferating or enriching above 60% which is what it actually is
Not proliferating or enriching above 60% which is what it actually is
There’s additional variables which nullify the Reuters quote, namely that it was made when the contents of the MOU were still unknown (and potentially not finalized) and is contradicted by further Reuters reporting, the entire obsession with the Reuters quote is centered around the fog that existed around the deal at the time rather than any kind of authoritative statement of Iranian state policy on enrichment
There’s additional variables which nullify the Reuters quote, namely that it was made when the contents of the MOU were still unknown (and potentially not finalized) and is contradicted by further Reuters reporting, the entire obsession with the Reuters quote is centered around the fog that existed around the deal at the time rather than any kind of authoritative statement of Iranian state policy on enrichment
I thrive seething
I thrive seething
https://www.facebook.com/CBSNews/videos/vice-president-jd-vance-says-tehran-has-promised-not-to-enrich-uranium-and-has-p/1020741833704014/
The actual video
https://www.facebook.com/CBSNews/videos/vice-president-jd-vance-says-tehran-has-promised-not-to-enrich-uranium-and-has-p/1020741833704014/
The actual video
^ here
^ here
Already addressed this and have quoted it multiple times
Already addressed this and have quoted it multiple times
Commitments made upon conclusion of upcoming nuclear negotiations have no bearing on the status of this market, there’s no justification for the interpretation of anything here as representing a commitment to halt enrichment as I’ve continually outlined for 12 hours
Commitments made upon conclusion of upcoming nuclear negotiations have no bearing on the status of this market, there’s no justification for the interpretation of anything here as representing a commitment to halt enrichment as I’ve continually outlined for 12 hours
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, or at least any evidence?
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, or at least any evidence?
This leap requires multiple jumps which have zero basis in reality, and simply don’t exist in the MOU in any way shape or form
This leap requires multiple jumps which have zero basis in reality, and simply don’t exist in the MOU in any way shape or form
https://x.com/IranIntlbrk/status/2067887814570578055
https://x.com/IranIntlbrk/status/2067887814570578055
Which have mind you been reiterated by actual senior figures of the Islamic Republic as recently as today
Which have mind you been reiterated by actual senior figures of the Islamic Republic as recently as today
Such an acquiescence would represent a substantial departure in the Iranian negotiating position and a move away from the previously stated Iranian red lines
Such an acquiescence would represent a substantial departure in the Iranian negotiating position and a move away from the previously stated Iranian red lines
It’s logically a leap because it isn’t what those words mean the leap is concluding that “status quo” in the MOU refers in any way shape or form to the enrichment file which is specifically precluded from this MOU pending further negotiations, and that leap is predicated by tying this statement (baselessly) to prior claims (similarly baseless and likely untrue for the record) made about the status of Iranian enrichment, its multiple leaps which has zero basis in reality which is why no media reporting exists and no evidence exists for this claim
It’s logically a leap because it isn’t what those words mean the leap is concluding that “status quo” in the MOU refers in any way shape or form to the enrichment file which is specifically precluded from this MOU pending further negotiations, and that leap is predicated by tying this statement (baselessly) to prior claims (similarly baseless and likely untrue for the record) made about the status of Iranian enrichment, its multiple leaps which has zero basis in reality which is why no media reporting exists and no evidence exists for this claim
https://tenor.com/view/wolfofwallstreet-wall-drink-drinking-leo-nardo-di-caprio-gif-5341587
https://tenor.com/view/wolfofwallstreet-wall-drink-drinking-leo-nardo-di-caprio-gif-5341587
No that’s not the status quo that’s a leap, statements made by Iran about one of the most tightly held state secrets and foreign intelligence agencies stating that Iran isn’t actively enriching (from before the war btw) and the acceptance of the status quo therefore meaning accepting a pause of enrichment is a leap which has at no point been established by a single person as having any kind of basis
No that’s not the status quo that’s a leap, statements made by Iran about one of the most tightly held state secrets and foreign intelligence agencies stating that Iran isn’t actively enriching (from before the war btw) and the acceptance of the status quo therefore meaning accepting a pause of enrichment is a leap which has at no point been established by a single person as having any kind of basis
They all share something in common of being unbelievably hollow and that’s because this market is unequivocally not Y as of now
They all share something in common of being unbelievably hollow and that’s because this market is unequivocally not Y as of now
Many have been distorting quotes and circumstances / significance around said quotes
Many have been distorting quotes and circumstances / significance around said quotes
Many have been predicated on a lack of understanding of the phraseology
Many have been predicated on a lack of understanding of the phraseology
Many of the claims made have been blatant egregious lies
Many of the claims made have been blatant egregious lies
Not one of these arguments holds up to scrutiny as even a significant variable let alone market resolving
Not one of these arguments holds up to scrutiny as even a significant variable let alone market resolving
I will dedicate the coming days to addressing literally every ridiculous and patently false claim made by those arguing Y here as I’ve already spent the last 12~ hours doing
I will dedicate the coming days to addressing literally every ridiculous and patently false claim made by those arguing Y here as I’ve already spent the last 12~ hours doing
And considering the president of the United States ceded the probable reality that Iran would consider enriching, the MOU outlining enrichment as a clause left to future negotiations, and endless other reporting here I’m not sure what this insistence on the opinion piece by the parliamentarian whose party is in opposition is all about but it’s obviously hollow
And considering the president of the United States ceded the probable reality that Iran would consider enriching, the MOU outlining enrichment as a clause left to future negotiations, and endless other reporting here I’m not sure what this insistence on the opinion piece by the parliamentarian whose party is in opposition is all about but it’s obviously hollow
Presupposing that a pause means that pause refers to enrichment is a leap, yes
Presupposing that a pause means that pause refers to enrichment is a leap, yes
Considering the obvious opinion based nature of his writing why should his opinions be exalted above others?
Considering the obvious opinion based nature of his writing why should his opinions be exalted above others?
Just as he makes a claim I can find endless other examples of others making a claim
Just as he makes a claim I can find endless other examples of others making a claim
No it doesn’t, he makes a claim of what status quo is, he’s far from an authoritative source here and the entire text clearly outlines the statement as his opinion on the deal rather than any kind of authoritative statement on behalf of the government of Iran
No it doesn’t, he makes a claim of what status quo is, he’s far from an authoritative source here and the entire text clearly outlines the statement as his opinion on the deal rather than any kind of authoritative statement on behalf of the government of Iran
They’re left with chaotic misquotes, misinterpretations and gross distortion of basic facts
They’re left with chaotic misquotes, misinterpretations and gross distortion of basic facts
Typically an argument is needed for a scam to be sufficient to resolve a market, luckily for N holders in the case of this market Y has quite literally zero market with any foundation to stand on
Typically an argument is needed for a scam to be sufficient to resolve a market, luckily for N holders in the case of this market Y has quite literally zero market with any foundation to stand on
Not even one holds up to the slightest scrutiny
Not even one holds up to the slightest scrutiny
All of these points have been engaged with sufficiently, literally all of them
All of these points have been engaged with sufficiently, literally all of them
It’s little more than a parliamentarian in Iran (not in government btw his party is the official opposition party in parliament) expressing his opinion about the meaning of the deal
It’s little more than a parliamentarian in Iran (not in government btw his party is the official opposition party in parliament) expressing his opinion about the meaning of the deal
No actually that’s not the quote, he’s presupposing based on stated Iranian policy that Iran isn’t enriching and then concluding (his opinion rather than any kind of authoritative statement) that the text in the MOU means by extension that Iran has acquiesced on the right to enrichment
No actually that’s not the quote, he’s presupposing based on stated Iranian policy that Iran isn’t enriching and then concluding (his opinion rather than any kind of authoritative statement) that the text in the MOU means by extension that Iran has acquiesced on the right to enrichment
This is a widely talked about topic around the world running with people’s opinions as the basis to resolve the market as basically the sole argument left standing is absurd and you know it as well as I do
This is a widely talked about topic around the world running with people’s opinions as the basis to resolve the market as basically the sole argument left standing is absurd and you know it as well as I do
> This is what you’re citing where he specifically as a parliamentarian outside of the “ruling” government btw, is criticizing the flaws and ambiguities in the deal as he sees it? This is the 7th moved goalpost smoking gun with no relevance?
This is the post I could find which is mediocre I think I have a different one but having trouble finding it in the mess, tldr he’s critiquing the deal itself and bringing up the lack of clarity in the deal and is speaking as a member of parliament (one of many ruling state structures in Iran) in a party outside of government and outlining his opinion on the matter, it’s far from any kind of authoritative statement on the policy of Iran even if he was the kind of figure capable of making such statements (which he’s not)
> This is what you’re citing where he specifically as a parliamentarian outside of the “ruling” government btw, is criticizing the flaws and ambiguities in the deal as he sees it? This is the 7th moved goalpost smoking gun with no relevance?
This is the post I could find which is mediocre I think I have a different one but having trouble finding it in the mess, tldr he’s critiquing the deal itself and bringing up the lack of clarity in the deal and is speaking as a member of parliament (one of many ruling state structures in Iran) in a party outside of government and outlining his opinion on the matter, it’s far from any kind of authoritative statement on the policy of Iran even if he was the kind of figure capable of making such statements (which he’s not)
Addressed this in a prior post let me quote it for you
Addressed this in a prior post let me quote it for you
The entire MOU was this, Lebanon, SOU, sanctions, nuclear etc
The entire MOU was this, Lebanon, SOU, sanctions, nuclear etc
It’s a very bad sign in these disputes when the entire original argument is abandoned in pursuit of another one tbh
It’s a very bad sign in these disputes when the entire original argument is abandoned in pursuit of another one tbh
And moved onto a completely different basket of worthless distortions
And moved onto a completely different basket of worthless distortions
They’ve basically totally abandoned the arguments they were making originally as they were obviously ridiculous and hollow
They’ve basically totally abandoned the arguments they were making originally as they were obviously ridiculous and hollow
They’ve almost exclusively presented worthless arguments that fall apart upon the slightest inspection it’s insanity this is only 50/50 rn on the market really shows the faith people have in this sites resolution process
They’ve almost exclusively presented worthless arguments that fall apart upon the slightest inspection it’s insanity this is only 50/50 rn on the market really shows the faith people have in this sites resolution process
The commitment on the status quo is against upblending U235 to enrichment statuses above 60% and not pursuing proliferation
The commitment on the status quo is against upblending U235 to enrichment statuses above 60% and not pursuing proliferation
The yes cause also shot itself in the foot by continually tying itself to a misinterpretation of the phrase “further uranium enrichment” which they’ve largely stopped arguing but was central to the argument they’re making
The yes cause also shot itself in the foot by continually tying itself to a misinterpretation of the phrase “further uranium enrichment” which they’ve largely stopped arguing but was central to the argument they’re making
https://tenor.com/view/blocked-block-you-blocked-blocking-gif-14145534
https://tenor.com/view/blocked-block-you-blocked-blocking-gif-14145534
Someone else can engage with you if they want I won’t waste my time you’re no concern to me
Someone else can engage with you if they want I won’t waste my time you’re no concern to me
It’s random drivel which borders on nonsensical
It’s random drivel which borders on nonsensical
No, they’re not “irrelevant” in a market about Irans statements on the matter and nothing you’ve said has had any substance to it
No, they’re not “irrelevant” in a market about Irans statements on the matter and nothing you’ve said has had any substance to it
Idk what you’re yapping about and I can tell someone else with low cog will enjoy going back and forth with you this is a market about Iranian claims sir
Idk what you’re yapping about and I can tell someone else with low cog will enjoy going back and forth with you this is a market about Iranian claims sir
Irans laws are irrelevant to Iran? Okay!
Irans laws are irrelevant to Iran? Okay!
I’m not even sure you’re asking to be honest mate
I’m not even sure you’re asking to be honest mate
Polymarket