PolymarketNo and that’s not necessary for the market (and also not relevant in reality)
No and that’s not necessary for the market (and also not relevant in reality)
Effendi参与话题 0消息总数 351
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 351 条，显示第 251-300 条The PM spoke on the agreement yesterday
The PM spoke on the agreement yesterday
Denying that they’ll adhere to it not that the agreement doesn’t exist
Denying that they’ll adhere to it not that the agreement doesn’t exist
The agreement was negotiated by the Iranians and Americans where Hezbollah and Israel are parties of the overarching agreement between the Americans and Iranians
The agreement was negotiated by the Iranians and Americans where Hezbollah and Israel are parties of the overarching agreement between the Americans and Iranians
Hezbollah has very clearly communicated Israel has mainly communicated that they won’t abide by the deal in communicating the deals existence
Hezbollah has very clearly communicated Israel has mainly communicated that they won’t abide by the deal in communicating the deals existence
Whether in the rules or reality
Whether in the rules or reality
There’s functionally zero difference
There’s functionally zero difference
All of these arguments can be used to apply to permanent peace btw
All of these arguments can be used to apply to permanent peace btw
The latter
The latter
For an agreement to be implemented yes, for the agreement to exist, no
For an agreement to be implemented yes, for the agreement to exist, no
I mean if we’re talking about the reality the deal definitely includes Hezb & Israel as was agreed by the Americans and Iranians you’re just looking at domestic political variables in Israel around the messaging
I mean if we’re talking about the reality the deal definitely includes Hezb & Israel as was agreed by the Americans and Iranians you’re just looking at domestic political variables in Israel around the messaging
If you change the rules to mean ascent to the deal you can argue that the Israelis have denied that they’ll participate
If you change the rules to mean ascent to the deal you can argue that the Israelis have denied that they’ll participate
The bar is very low, the existence of a deal is really all that’s needed if you go by the rules
The bar is very low, the existence of a deal is really all that’s needed if you go by the rules
Has*
Has*
Iran have been clear on it being permanent cessation of hostilities Americans have been far less clear
Iran have been clear on it being permanent cessation of hostilities Americans have been far less clear
No either or, both parties sign / adopt **OR** both clearly communicate such an agreement exists
No either or, both parties sign / adopt **OR** both clearly communicate such an agreement exists
Well from which angle because reality is borderline indisputable as far as I see it
Well from which angle because reality is borderline indisputable as far as I see it
My argument is all of the markets should resolve the exact same as they’re all parties and the distinction of the deal being directly between the US and Iran is unsubstantial in both reality and the rules
My argument is all of the markets should resolve the exact same as they’re all parties and the distinction of the deal being directly between the US and Iran is unsubstantial in both reality and the rules
If you guys truly think Israel is some independent variable here you’re deluded
If you guys truly think Israel is some independent variable here you’re deluded
Problem with this place is you never know if people are arguing from a position of ignorance or bad faith or both
Problem with this place is you never know if people are arguing from a position of ignorance or bad faith or both
Either Iran US permanent deal shouldn’t go through or this one should
Either Iran US permanent deal shouldn’t go through or this one should
To be clear in reality this has happened and the sole variable at play is related to Israeli politics
To be clear in reality this has happened and the sole variable at play is related to Israeli politics
I mean they’re not active parties in the conflict it’s obviously nowhere near equivalent
I mean they’re not active parties in the conflict it’s obviously nowhere near equivalent
I’m not talking about the markets but reality
I’m not talking about the markets but reality
No both are involved directly
No both are involved directly
Yes to both but ignoramuses will insist otherwise
Yes to both but ignoramuses will insist otherwise
You absolutely can when in the case of both Iran and the United States you have substantial leverage over the junior party and are operating jointly in a conflict
You absolutely can when in the case of both Iran and the United States you have substantial leverage over the junior party and are operating jointly in a conflict
There’s a lot of political messaging going on atm that is muddying the waters as far as what’s actually happening
There’s a lot of political messaging going on atm that is muddying the waters as far as what’s actually happening
Yes as the deal involves all parties
Yes as the deal involves all parties
And nuclear deal
And nuclear deal
Both markets are similarly cucky and the notion that Israelis and Hezb aren’t junior parties to this deal is silly
Both markets are similarly cucky and the notion that Israelis and Hezb aren’t junior parties to this deal is silly
It’s the truth this is central to the entire thing
It’s the truth this is central to the entire thing
This was a central sticking point to getting that original MOU if we’re talking about reality
This was a central sticking point to getting that original MOU if we’re talking about reality
It’s no more of a cuck in reality than US Iran permanent peace
It’s no more of a cuck in reality than US Iran permanent peace
I don’t really care much what happens with it but I think the insistence of it as a cuck or distortion is silly I doubt it’ll work but it definitely aligns with reality
I don’t really care much what happens with it but I think the insistence of it as a cuck or distortion is silly I doubt it’ll work but it definitely aligns with reality
I don’t think it’s a cuck I think this is the deal, the central sticking point was the general ceasefire and the presumption that this isn’t primarily an American Iran confrontation with Hezbollah and Israel as junior partners is silly
I don’t think it’s a cuck I think this is the deal, the central sticking point was the general ceasefire and the presumption that this isn’t primarily an American Iran confrontation with Hezbollah and Israel as junior partners is silly
Is this guy changing his cat profile pic like every 5 mins
Is this guy changing his cat profile pic like every 5 mins
The latter point has happened, both have clearly communicated the existence of this agreement
The latter point has happened, both have clearly communicated the existence of this agreement
Adoption or implementation isn’t required
Adoption or implementation isn’t required
There’s elements of this yes but claiming they don’t have to abide is more broad there has been a lot of claims made at this point
There’s elements of this yes but claiming they don’t have to abide is more broad there has been a lot of claims made at this point
No ratio loan
No ratio loan
Or get a cheaper condo…
Or get a cheaper condo…
I still don’t understand why ur so opposed to buying a condo ngl
I still don’t understand why ur so opposed to buying a condo ngl
triacetone triperoxide
triacetone triperoxide
💀
💀
You banned too?
You banned too?
Avi
Avi
I think the perm peace bros made a mistake by letting the kiddie sniffer dominate the conversation for hours that night ngl
I think the perm peace bros made a mistake by letting the kiddie sniffer dominate the conversation for hours that night ngl
Truly devastating stuff
Truly devastating stuff
Devastating
Devastating