it just needs to be a successor version to the June 14th one, yes
it just needs to be a successor version to the June 14th one, yes
该用户的聊天记录定位。
it just needs to be a successor version to the June 14th one, yes
it just needs to be a successor version to the June 14th one, yes
bro...
bro...
bro because EVERY SINGLE LEAKED MOU IS ALMOST FUCKING IDENTICALLLLL
bro because EVERY SINGLE LEAKED MOU IS ALMOST FUCKING IDENTICALLLLL
you can't be real breh
you can't be real breh
I'll just ignore him atp, yeah
I'll just ignore him atp, yeah
yeah I'd be suprised if anything about lebanon is on there, trump must've shoe-horned that shit in last second
yeah I'd be suprised if anything about lebanon is on there, trump must've shoe-horned that shit in last second
lets be real, nothing significant is changing. They've already agreed via backchannels to more than is on the MOU too
lets be real, nothing significant is changing. They've already agreed via backchannels to more than is on the MOU too
zoom in on her pussy region too
zoom in on her pussy region too
srsly put it back
srsly put it back
nigga FUCK you
nigga FUCK you
that pfp says you're of age
that pfp says you're of age
<@1319754532393062425> # nigga go get buns LOL 😭 🙏✌️
<@1319754532393062425> # nigga go get buns LOL 😭 🙏✌️
bro looked at the price and was like "I choose the winning side " 😭
bro looked at the price and was like "I choose the winning side " 😭
you definitely did not do your research but ok <:ICANT:1306491472417263636>
you definitely did not do your research but ok <:ICANT:1306491472417263636>
why did you vote at all without knowing anything?
why did you vote at all without knowing anything?
being first != reliable
being first != reliable
bro <:ICANT:1306491472417263636>
bro <:ICANT:1306491472417263636>
Laccs post on UMA combined with guywhotrades explains it well
Laccs post on UMA combined with guywhotrades explains it well
lmao
lmao
PM won't interfere once the voting process starts. Also UMA token holders aren't allowed to bet on polymarket.
PM won't interfere once the voting process starts. Also UMA token holders aren't allowed to bet on polymarket.
holy cum buckets
holy cum buckets
Yes boys: we wuz kangs
Yes boys: we wuz kangs
there's a UMA discord, this is the thread for the market you're talking about: https://discord.com/channels/718590743446290492/1516110151721943091
there's a UMA discord, this is the thread for the market you're talking about: https://discord.com/channels/718590743446290492/1516110151721943091
they're not ending the war, announcing an agreement if they still disagree on anything but extremely miniscule details
they're not ending the war, announcing an agreement if they still disagree on anything but extremely miniscule details
yes, that copy is the 99% meat copy. Not much is really being changed despite the media confusion.
yes, that copy is the 99% meat copy. Not much is really being changed despite the media confusion.
the friday one is a PR "ceremony". the deal has already been agreed upon.
the friday one is a PR "ceremony". the deal has already been agreed upon.
before it actually got signed
before it actually got signed
they even pre-warned that it would be signed digitally
they even pre-warned that it would be signed digitally
it was digitally signed, as they both annouced to media during interviews/statements
it was digitally signed, as they both annouced to media during interviews/statements
if you want a lottery ticket I suggest you go down to your local gas station and buy one. At least that one has a chance of winning.
if you want a lottery ticket I suggest you go down to your local gas station and buy one. At least that one has a chance of winning.
what? Al Arabiya said "Al Arabiya English has obtained a copy of the 14-point agreement expected to be signed on Friday between Washington and Tehran." How is that not claiming to have the document lol?
what? Al Arabiya said "Al Arabiya English has obtained a copy of the 14-point agreement expected to be signed on Friday between Washington and Tehran." How is that not claiming to have the document lol?
can you link the source for that claim?
can you link the source for that claim?
<@784924476432318484> you did good work, the truth is the rules allow the current leaked parts of the MOU to count. If they wanted a market where the "full MOU document must be formally revealed" then they shouldn't have included leaks and partial leaks at that in the rule clause.
<@784924476432318484> you did good work, the truth is the rules allow the current leaked parts of the MOU to count. If they wanted a market where the "full MOU document must be formally revealed" then they shouldn't have included leaks and partial leaks at that in the rule clause.
yep
yep
so you put together the overlap and you get yourselve SOME of the MOU that is all called valid by each media source
so you put together the overlap and you get yourselve SOME of the MOU that is all called valid by each media source
and each media source calls them valid
and each media source calls them valid
you're making a logical deducation that "because there's differing MOU versions by some amount, they must not all be valid" but that's not true. They could literally all be valid. There could be litereal multiple versions circulating right? Iran could have their version, US could have theirs, their might be multiple iterations.
you're making a logical deducation that "because there's differing MOU versions by some amount, they must not all be valid" but that's not true. They could literally all be valid. There could be litereal multiple versions circulating right? Iran could have their version, US could have theirs, their might be multiple iterations.
I mean at this point you're going against media consensus by calling it "unauthenticated". None of the media articles call it that, it's not like the epstien note case where they all called it unverified. You're deducing it as unauthenticated, the media isn't framing it as such.
I mean at this point you're going against media consensus by calling it "unauthenticated". None of the media articles call it that, it's not like the epstien note case where they all called it unverified. You're deducing it as unauthenticated, the media isn't framing it as such.
this right here is why you never ever ever take the N side of a trump insult market. Literally anything counts. So unless he's in a coma that day, its gg
this right here is why you never ever ever take the N side of a trump insult market. Literally anything counts. So unless he's in a coma that day, its gg
Yes, that's what I'm saying, the consensus of media shows that multiple drafts post june 14th are circulating and they all have some overlap in the clauses (there are clauses that all of them contain). Only part of the MOU must leak so given there is overlap we could reasonably say at least that part leaked even if you don't find consensus on all the clauses. So the exact entire MOU document has not reached a consus of being leaked you could argue, but there's enough overlap that SOME of the text of the MOU has leaked we can say, with consensus. Clearly text of the MOU has been leaked since June 14th.
Yes, that's what I'm saying, the consensus of media shows that multiple drafts post june 14th are circulating and they all have some overlap in the clauses (there are clauses that all of them contain). Only part of the MOU must leak so given there is overlap we could reasonably say at least that part leaked even if you don't find consensus on all the clauses. So the exact entire MOU document has not reached a consus of being leaked you could argue, but there's enough overlap that SOME of the text of the MOU has leaked we can say, with consensus. Clearly text of the MOU has been leaked since June 14th.
I genuinely cannot comprehend these insult markets
I genuinely cannot comprehend these insult markets
is it because he says "nobody every heard of" lol?
is it because he says "nobody every heard of" lol?
what's genocide.live?
what's genocide.live?
the rules are loose, you seem to be operating under a more strict ruleset
the rules are loose, you seem to be operating under a more strict ruleset
that's not debatable and there's plenty of sources for that very fact
that's not debatable and there's plenty of sources for that very fact
becuse there is clear overlap on some of the clauses
becuse there is clear overlap on some of the clauses
its clear that at least some of the MOU has been leaked
its clear that at least some of the MOU has been leaked
you're just obfuscating atp
you're just obfuscating atp
faaaaaah
faaaaaah
I NEED THAT $150 ON MY HIVE ACCNT
I NEED THAT $150 ON MY HIVE ACCNT