该用户的聊天记录定位。
but you bought the wrong side
but you bought the wrong side
I did say starmer N was a bond
I did say starmer N was a bond
isn't it also possible that starmer refuses to hand over with a delay?
isn't it also possible that starmer refuses to hand over with a delay?
that's actually true
that's actually true
domer is on starmer
domer is on starmer
he's 91
he's 91
the only alternative is like palestine president dies
the only alternative is like palestine president dies
elite strategy
elite strategy
bought high sold low both sides
bought high sold low both sides
does he actually say september
does he actually say september
did you listen to this?
did you listen to this?
it's most likely gonna be uncontested
it's most likely gonna be uncontested
contest can be complete by august 7
contest can be complete by august 7
no?
no?
genuinely are you saying starmer can't be out by august 7?
genuinely are you saying starmer can't be out by august 7?
why am i a schizo
why am i a schizo
good luck!
good luck!
and why do you think it can't happen by august 7?
and why do you think it can't happen by august 7?
it's an obvious no, the insult needs to be personal
it's an obvious no, the insult needs to be personal
it's possible, but unlikely
it's possible, but unlikely
yeah it's close to a coinflip
yeah it's close to a coinflip
it's up to the contestants, but I suppose it is
it's up to the contestants, but I suppose it is
chatgpt ahh opinion
chatgpt ahh opinion
I'd actually be surprised if he doesn't go uncontested
I'd actually be surprised if he doesn't go uncontested
burnham most likely goes uncontested and if he does, he will 90% of cases replace starmer by august 7
burnham most likely goes uncontested and if he does, he will 90% of cases replace starmer by august 7
I'm actually banging my head against the wall that I didn't buy starmer at 15c
I'm actually banging my head against the wall that I didn't buy starmer at 15c
I was very wrong
I was very wrong
yes
yes
I actually researched this more, and I think fv is around 55c
I actually researched this more, and I think fv is around 55c
actually after doing a bit more research, I think starmer will most likely be out by august 7
actually after doing a bit more research, I think starmer will most likely be out by august 7
yes
yes
I think problem is the British people
I think problem is the British people
https://x.com/Reuters/status/2068608652152275092?s=20
https://x.com/Reuters/status/2068608652152275092?s=20
https://x.com/BRICSinfo/status/2068590606289432971?s=20
https://x.com/BRICSinfo/status/2068590606289432971?s=20
Are they going to have one?
Are they going to have one?
is he gonna do it on the same day after 10 years?
is he gonna do it on the same day after 10 years?
2 persons voted N, menade and it's alt
2 persons voted N, menade and it's alt
analysis != consensus though
analysis != consensus though
obviously
obviously
it's logistically impossible, and judging from what he has said thus far, he won't voluntarily resign
it's logistically impossible, and judging from what he has said thus far, he won't voluntarily resign
that's technically correct, but since the consensus revolves around MoU, I guess it doesn't
that's technically correct, but since the consensus revolves around MoU, I guess it doesn't
what's the likelihood of this going through
what's the likelihood of this going through
also, if this goes p4 judging from MoU or reporting thereof, trump agreeing to enrichment cannot also go p4
also, if this goes p4 judging from MoU or reporting thereof, trump agreeing to enrichment cannot also go p4
<@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578>
<@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578>
The MOU treats the current stockpile as a fixed quantity that needs to be addressed in negotiations (downblending). If Iran resumes or expands uranium enrichment during this 60-day window, the stockpile grows. A growing stockpile directly undermines the stated purpose of the negotiation period (reducing/disposing of the stockpile). The downblending mandate is undermined by any new enrichment. If Iran is permitted to continue or resume enrichment (even at low levels) during this window, a causal problem arises: The total enriched uranium stockpile grows while the parties are supposed to be negotiating how to reduce it. This would make the interim framework internally incoherent. The only way the downblending negotiation makes sense is if the stockpile (and the enrichment that feeds it) is held constant. Low-enriched uranium is the direct feedstock for further enrichment to higher levels. Allowing Iran to produce new LEU during the 60-day interim period increases the available feed material - hence the "status quo of nuclear program" - which eludes a strict definition. If you cannot interpret the standalone "status quo," consider the memorandum text as a whole and you might understand that it has to mean something, i.e. absence of nothing.
The MOU treats the current stockpile as a fixed quantity that needs to be addressed in negotiations (downblending). If Iran resumes or expands uranium enrichment during this 60-day window, the stockpile grows. A growing stockpile directly undermines the stated purpose of the negotiation period (reducing/disposing of the stockpile). The downblending mandate is undermined by any new enrichment. If Iran is permitted to continue or resume enrichment (even at low levels) during this window, a causal problem arises: The total enriched uranium stockpile grows while the parties are supposed to be negotiating how to reduce it. This would make the interim framework internally incoherent. The only way the downblending negotiation makes sense is if the stockpile (and the enrichment that feeds it) is held constant. Low-enriched uranium is the direct feedstock for further enrichment to higher levels. Allowing Iran to produce new LEU during the 60-day interim period increases the available feed material - hence the "status quo of nuclear program" - which eludes a strict definition. If you cannot interpret the standalone "status quo," consider the memorandum text as a whole and you might understand that it has to mean something, i.e. absence of nothing.
it's right there. what do you think status quo means?
it's right there. what do you think status quo means?
if maintaining implicably agrees not to enrich, it agrees to end enrichment. it might be a little complex
if maintaining implicably agrees not to enrich, it agrees to end enrichment. it might be a little complex
you have written nothing but adhominems for the past 6 hours
you have written nothing but adhominems for the past 6 hours
this and trump agrees to enrichment cannot both go p4
this and trump agrees to enrichment cannot both go p4
2h
2h