聊天记录
共 1585 条，显示第 351-400 条
Status quo cannot mean that they are actively enriching, because:
a) if you're taking "status quo" at a face value, you can go ahead and conclude that they are actively building a nuke;
b) this is unquestionably false, main reason being that it contradicts the same memorandum under which the "status quo" is implicably agreed to;
c) under the same memorandum, there is a negotiation mandate over the stockpiles;
d) Continuing enrichment would causally defeat that mandate. Hence, the status quo commitment must function as a halt on further enrichment during the interim period.
<@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578>
Status quo cannot mean that they are actively enriching, because:
a) if you're taking "status quo" at a face value, you can go ahead and conclude that they are actively building a nuke;
b) this is unquestionably false, main reason being that it contradicts the same memorandum under which the "status quo" is implicably agreed to;
c) under the same memorandum, there is a negotiation mandate over the stockpiles;
d) Continuing enrichment would causally defeat that mandate. Hence, the status quo commitment must function as a halt on further enrichment during the interim period.
<@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578>
I had logout issues for past 2 months
I had logout issues for past 2 months
PM shows -1.9k so idk why this is different
PM shows -1.9k so idk why this is different
hmm comeback
hmm comeback
bm chart profile luciferianinsigne
bm chart profile luciferianinsigne
this is honestly embarrassing. driving a car is something chronologically incosistent. it's not the same as breathing
this is honestly embarrassing. driving a car is something chronologically incosistent. it's not the same as breathing
"end" is not the same as "commit to end"
"end" is not the same as "commit to end"
I can, provided that I used to drive for a period of time in the past
I can, provided that I used to drive for a period of time in the past
that's a poor analogy. being fat isn't something active, it is structural. I used to eat peanuts. I still have peanuts at home but don't eat them for no binding reason. I can proclaim not to eat peanuts for 2 months, and this is going to be binding
that's a poor analogy. being fat isn't something active, it is structural. I used to eat peanuts. I still have peanuts at home but don't eat them for no binding reason. I can proclaim not to eat peanuts for 2 months, and this is going to be binding
you can proactively commit to end something that used to happen before. that's not an argument
you can proactively commit to end something that used to happen before. that's not an argument
I beg you to look at the resolution source
I beg you to look at the resolution source
but resolution criteria isn't strictly written/binding
but resolution criteria isn't strictly written/binding
whats the tldr on switzerland meeting? are they flying or no
whats the tldr on switzerland meeting? are they flying or no
since the ceasefire extension clarif, it's hard to draw a line between formal and informal tbh
since the ceasefire extension clarif, it's hard to draw a line between formal and informal tbh
"the mahmoud guys"
"the mahmoud guys"
<@570563844678877196>
<@570563844678877196>
more or less yes, but still an argument in its own right
more or less yes, but still an argument in its own right
It is not written as "highly enriched uranium stockpile" or something. In nuclear diplomacy, enriched material normally includes all uranium above natural levels. If the parties had intended to restrict the mandate only to HEU, they could have (and likely would have) used narrower language.
The concern is how quickly Iran can produce more weapons-usable uranium in the future.
Low-enriched uranium is the direct feedstock for further enrichment to higher levels.
Allowing Iran to produce new LEU during the 60-day interim period increases the available feed material - hence the "status quo of nuclear program" - which eludes a strict definition.
It is not written as "highly enriched uranium stockpile" or something. In nuclear diplomacy, enriched material normally includes all uranium above natural levels. If the parties had intended to restrict the mandate only to HEU, they could have (and likely would have) used narrower language.
The concern is how quickly Iran can produce more weapons-usable uranium in the future.
Low-enriched uranium is the direct feedstock for further enrichment to higher levels.
Allowing Iran to produce new LEU during the 60-day interim period increases the available feed material - hence the "status quo of nuclear program" - which eludes a strict definition.
If I go into a contract as a landlord, and proceed to proclaim that if the guest refuses to pay rent, he will be kicked out, does this mean that our agreement is not definitively commited to?
If I go into a contract as a landlord, and proceed to proclaim that if the guest refuses to pay rent, he will be kicked out, does this mean that our agreement is not definitively commited to?
The market spirit is quality of the intention of the party (the US)
The market spirit is quality of the intention of the party (the US)
Market spirit is "commitment or initiative"
Market spirit is "commitment or initiative"
It's a commitment market
It's a commitment market
Exactly
Exactly
At the very least, it's definitively commited to, and more - initiated. The rules are satisfied at all points
At the very least, it's definitively commited to, and more - initiated. The rules are satisfied at all points
But under the MoU, it's not a matter of "if" - that is your intepretation
But under the MoU, it's not a matter of "if" - that is your intepretation
<@941405798096076880>
<@941405798096076880>
The fact that the other demands were realized immediately is not an argument, there is a clause to cover that. They explicitly accepted to commit to finalizing the deal, under which they will be bound to withdraw troops, i.e. it's an acceptance, only a complexified one
The fact that the other demands were realized immediately is not an argument, there is a clause to cover that. They explicitly accepted to commit to finalizing the deal, under which they will be bound to withdraw troops, i.e. it's an acceptance, only a complexified one
Unless the condition is definitively agreed to. It's a complexified definitive agreement
Unless the condition is definitively agreed to. It's a complexified definitive agreement
If I go into a contract as a landlord, and proceed to proclaim that if the guest refuses to pay rent, he will be kicked out, does this mean that our agreement is not definitively commited to?
If I go into a contract as a landlord, and proceed to proclaim that if the guest refuses to pay rent, he will be kicked out, does this mean that our agreement is not definitively commited to?
The fact that one thing qualifies doesn't delegitimize another thing
The fact that one thing qualifies doesn't delegitimize another thing
This falls under the correlation-causation fallacy
This falls under the correlation-causation fallacy
He's on my team. The esoteric thonkerites
He's on my team. The esoteric thonkerites
<@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578>
<@941405798096076880> <@1212792946341183578>
If troop withdrawal is N, permanent peace deal is also N, because:
a) the cessation of fighting clause is only legitimate under the MoU;
b) MoU gives a definitive timeline to finalize the deal;
c) once the timeline is crossed and the deal is not finalized under its terms OR, the MoU is violated within the timeline, the MoU ceases to be valid, thereby delegitimizing a permanent peace deal;
d) permanence of the peace deal is constituted by a separate clause of the MoU, which states that a deal is to be finalized, albeit definitively commited to.
If troop withdrawal is N, permanent peace deal is also N, because:
a) the cessation of fighting clause is only legitimate under the MoU;
b) MoU gives a definitive timeline to finalize the deal;
c) once the timeline is crossed and the deal is not finalized under its terms OR, the MoU is violated within the timeline, the MoU ceases to be valid, thereby delegitimizing a permanent peace deal;
d) permanence of the peace deal is constituted by a separate clause of the MoU, which states that a deal is to be finalized, albeit definitively commited to.
it's a part of the MoU, it's just a complexified, definitive agreement. the fact that it's a different case doesn't deligitimize it
it's a part of the MoU, it's just a complexified, definitive agreement. the fact that it's a different case doesn't deligitimize it
Polymarket my lawyers already been informed bout this. Y'all better tell your whales to not try another heist here like the 15th one. Text is out, and its 100% NO. Status quo means keep nuclear program, which is the 3.7% enrichment agreed with Obama in 2015. I'm telling ya y'all better wachout with who you try to steal👹
Polymarket my lawyers already been informed bout this. Y'all better tell your whales to not try another heist here like the 15th one. Text is out, and its 100% NO. Status quo means keep nuclear program, which is the 3.7% enrichment agreed with Obama in 2015. I'm telling ya y'all better wachout with who you try to steal👹
IthinkthisisHashem
IthinkthisisHashem
IthinkthisisG-d
IthinkthisisG-d
I need to keep my cool bro, I can't be dm ing a foid
I need to keep my cool bro, I can't be dm ing a foid
What's your bmi
What's your bmi
From the fact that you have tattoos and do K indicate that you're still fat
From the fact that you have tattoos and do K indicate that you're still fat
Well, firstly, is that you on your pfp?
Well, firstly, is that you on your pfp?
I like biology also, I've been reading papers for 2 years now
I like biology also, I've been reading papers for 2 years now
And you found out about peat through veronigga? Lmao
And you found out about peat through veronigga? Lmao
Idk what /fa/ is, I assume you had anorexia?
Idk what /fa/ is, I assume you had anorexia?
Have you heard of ray peat?
Have you heard of ray peat?
Start a timer nigga
Start a timer nigga
Med student?
Med student?
Become a online scammer or a prostitute. Which way moroccan foid?
Become a online scammer or a prostitute. Which way moroccan foid?
Genuinely what is wrong with you
Genuinely what is wrong with you
Polymarket