Polymarket😂
😂
epsilon参与话题 8消息总数 254
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 254 条，显示第 51-100 条<:Shrug:1306491719201849364>
<:Shrug:1306491719201849364>
give him home field advantage
give him home field advantage
I'll even fly to turkey
I'll even fly to turkey
I would pay to go against car at soccer
I would pay to go against car at soccer
Also moving the new market button was terrible
Also moving the new market button was terrible
possibly a ceasefire broken one 👀
possibly a ceasefire broken one 👀
New Iran Airspace markets pls <@1272383282687905939> <@941405798096076880>
New Iran Airspace markets pls <@1272383282687905939> <@941405798096076880>
to see losses anyways you had to press a button (or scroll down really far) anyways
to see losses anyways you had to press a button (or scroll down really far) anyways
who asked for this ?
who asked for this ?
having to toggle to see losses makes no sense at all and is completely absurd
having to toggle to see losses makes no sense at all and is completely absurd
💀
💀
<:ICANT:1306491472417263636>
<:ICANT:1306491472417263636>
wait is this from me
wait is this from me
the model is LITERALLY mythos and people are being retarted by saying otherwise … egregious rule cuck
the model is LITERALLY mythos and people are being retarted by saying otherwise … egregious rule cuck
hi
hi
LITERALLY is the model referenced in the leak, and by this they clearly meant any version of mythos which is why they included MYthos X
LITERALLY is the model referenced in the leak, and by this they clearly meant any version of mythos which is why they included MYthos X
the model is LITERALLY mythos
the model is LITERALLY mythos
Exactly
Exactly
they literally covered this by saying if it's the same model but called something else it counts
they literally covered this by saying if it's the same model but called something else it counts
yeah ppl are morons
yeah ppl are morons
vro i’m crine
vro i’m crine
bro
bro
I mean it's fine just hopefully in future they r more attentive to this
I mean it's fine just hopefully in future they r more attentive to this
(without some indicator like the title that highlights that it won't resolve the same)
(without some indicator like the title that highlights that it won't resolve the same)
Well we have had like 10 of these markets already so it's kinda reasonable to expect that the next one won't have a crucial detail changed in rules
Well we have had like 10 of these markets already so it's kinda reasonable to expect that the next one won't have a crucial detail changed in rules
Oh 💀
Oh 💀
market is great just title should make it clear that it's a coding debut
market is great just title should make it clear that it's a coding debut
I don't think bel made it
I don't think bel made it
Well FV is 1 - P(tech delay) and I think P(tech delay) is quite low
Well FV is 1 - P(tech delay) and I think P(tech delay) is quite low
<@941405798096076880> <@1400131860612513894> might be worth clarifying just for visibility or something to reiterate what is in nested in the rules given it's a huge change*
<@941405798096076880> <@1400131860612513894> might be worth clarifying just for visibility or something to reiterate what is in nested in the rules given it's a huge change*
💀
💀
The information reported it's coming today
The information reported it's coming today
I almost lost a LOT of money
I almost lost a LOT of money
I'm ngl suddenly switching it to that was kinda crazy
I'm ngl suddenly switching it to that was kinda crazy
I want 0
I want 0
fwiw I had no shares at time of clarif but imo this was just the common sense resoiution
fwiw I had no shares at time of clarif but imo this was just the common sense resoiution
and it’s quite silly to imply a model with guardrails means it is not the same model
and it’s quite silly to imply a model with guardrails means it is not the same model
My argument is it is a natural extension of the rules that a mythos class model counts.
My argument is it is a natural extension of the rules that a mythos class model counts.
Ok but “Mythos X” would count and would not be model referenced in the leak either!
Ok but “Mythos X” would count and would not be model referenced in the leak either!
If mythos preview & mythos 5, or any Mythos X variant would count as well as some “non mythos” model that is confirmed to be mythos preview, it makes a LOT of sense that any differently named but “mythos class” model should count. (one could very reasonably argue this is the intent of the rules, albeit not explicitly listed)
If mythos preview & mythos 5, or any Mythos X variant would count as well as some “non mythos” model that is confirmed to be mythos preview, it makes a LOT of sense that any differently named but “mythos class” model should count. (one could very reasonably argue this is the intent of the rules, albeit not explicitly listed)
<:ICANT:1306491472417263636>
<:ICANT:1306491472417263636>
and the rules literally had a carve out for this anyways!
and the rules literally had a carve out for this anyways!
they just are calling it something else
they just are calling it something else
It’s literally the same model w/ guard rails
It’s literally the same model w/ guard rails
The rules are explicit about models not named mythos possibly counting
The rules are explicit about models not named mythos possibly counting
There was always a chance that counted given they said the “model referenced in the leak” which is Mythos and made clear that things which were not called Mythos could count. It was just unclear if Anthropic describing something as “Mythos class” met the requirement of being “the thing mentioned in the leak”
There was always a chance that counted given they said the “model referenced in the leak” which is Mythos and made clear that things which were not called Mythos could count. It was just unclear if Anthropic describing something as “Mythos class” met the requirement of being “the thing mentioned in the leak”
Yeah one of the leaks literally says it’s the exact same model but w/ safe guards
Yeah one of the leaks literally says it’s the exact same model but w/ safe guards
This was a fine if not a good clarif
This was a fine if not a good clarif
Damn everybody taking vacations
Damn everybody taking vacations