PolymarketYup 100%
Yup 100%
epsilon参与话题 8消息总数 254
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 254 条，显示第 151-200 条<:HUHH:1306492546465398815>
<:HUHH:1306492546465398815>
i'm gonna lie this is tough
i'm gonna lie this is tough
this is tuff ngl
this is tuff ngl
# Hezbollah and Iran agreed to a perm peace deal but we don't have a market for it so by proxy Israel x Iran should go Yes
# Hezbollah and Iran agreed to a perm peace deal but we don't have a market for it so by proxy Israel x Iran should go Yes
I am just telling the facts how I see them
I am just telling the facts how I see them
Why are you being rude I am giving a summary for bel
Why are you being rude I am giving a summary for bel
No it's not- it's my interpretation
No it's not- it's my interpretation
Can everyone upvote this so the poly staff can get to bottom of it
Can everyone upvote this so the poly staff can get to bottom of it
# Hezbollah and Iran agreed to a perm peace deal but we don't have a market for it so by proxy Israel x Iran should go Yes
# Hezbollah and Iran agreed to a perm peace deal but we don't have a market for it so by proxy Israel x Iran should go Yes
💀
💀
dm
dm
feels wrong
feels wrong
it's a cuck
it's a cuck
but this is a cuck
but this is a cuck
I was wrong there may be an argument for N I guess
I was wrong there may be an argument for N I guess
I guess No does have an argument
I guess No does have an argument
They are CLEARLY reviewing models prior to release, they are not approving/not approving them but they are being examined
They are CLEARLY reviewing models prior to release, they are not approving/not approving them but they are being examined
This is semantics but it's important, review can be passive with no outcome, i.e I can examine something and make no determination with it still being a review
This is semantics but it's important, review can be passive with no outcome, i.e I can examine something and make no determination with it still being a review
You are confusing review and approve
You are confusing review and approve
Why write "reviewing" OR "approving" if they are the same thing? A review is clearly a passive thing else this is redundant
Why write "reviewing" OR "approving" if they are the same thing? A review is clearly a passive thing else this is redundant
It does not have to restrict public release
It does not have to restrict public release
Idk
Idk
Voluntary is not excluded
Voluntary is not excluded
> (ii) provide the Federal Government with access to covered frontier models, subject to appropriate confidentiality, cybersecurity, insider-risk, and intellectual-property protection, use, and nondisclosure requirements, for a period of up to 30 days before they plan to release such models to other trusted partners; and
> (ii) provide the Federal Government with access to covered frontier models, subject to appropriate confidentiality, cybersecurity, insider-risk, and intellectual-property protection, use, and nondisclosure requirements, for a period of up to 30 days before they plan to release such models to other trusted partners; and
spirit is yes though
spirit is yes though
I guess there is an argument for N
I guess there is an argument for N
> venezuelians
> venezuelians
> venezuelians
> venezuelians
They normally end on Fridays so June 5 is likely correct date
They normally end on Fridays so June 5 is likely correct date
<:cathuh:1507881720261640264>
<:cathuh:1507881720261640264>
It was an announcement market 😭
It was an announcement market 😭
Market had shitty rules and the fact they did not fix them was kinda crazy
Market had shitty rules and the fact they did not fix them was kinda crazy
where are all the good disputes lately, it's just been boring scams
where are all the good disputes lately, it's just been boring scams
and maybe August too just for the best ai model one
and maybe August too just for the best ai model one
Can we get the July best ai markets <@1400131860612513894>
Can we get the July best ai markets <@1400131860612513894>
They will fix this market and these kind of markets for the future but another similar thing will occur again and we will be back at the same spot
They will fix this market and these kind of markets for the future but another similar thing will occur again and we will be back at the same spot
Unfortunately
Unfortunately
there would be outrage either way- market should’ve gone 50:50 or just been refunded
there would be outrage either way- market should’ve gone 50:50 or just been refunded
nope lol
nope lol
yup
yup
a clarifications days earlier would’ve been the appropriate move
a clarifications days earlier would’ve been the appropriate move
the problem is the rules were shitty and this was a predictable outcome
the problem is the rules were shitty and this was a predictable outcome
the cftc does not seem to care
the cftc does not seem to care
Panama
Panama
<:Sadding:1306492753869537382>
<:Sadding:1306492753869537382>
the other takes down
the other takes down
anyone wanna put 20k on btc up/down, one of us takes up
anyone wanna put 20k on btc up/down, one of us takes up
epsilonpm
epsilonpm
I want to retweet can you unblock me
I want to retweet can you unblock me