PolymarketHeh, I knew that wall was sus.
Heh, I knew that wall was sus.
OVR参与话题 3消息总数 282
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 282 条，显示第 151-200 条Rofl
Rofl
everyone will pass me in PNL someday i guarantee
everyone will pass me in PNL someday i guarantee
https://tenor.com/view/you-shall-not-pass-lord-of-the-rings-lotr-mad-gif-15211479
https://tenor.com/view/you-shall-not-pass-lord-of-the-rings-lotr-mad-gif-15211479
https://tenor.com/view/gif-gif-19492549
https://tenor.com/view/gif-gif-19492549
<:ICANT:1091897440220745848>
<:ICANT:1091897440220745848>
Bro if this is real than you gotta ban half of polysquare
Bro if this is real than you gotta ban half of polysquare
What's justice? Resolving YES based on information that came after market deadline? Get real.
What's justice? Resolving YES based on information that came after market deadline? Get real.
price is low cuz polymarket clarified it doesn't count
price is low cuz polymarket clarified it doesn't count
there wasn't a ceasefire agreement, he posted there was
there wasn't a ceasefire agreement, he posted there was
because ceasefire went yes that way
because ceasefire went yes that way
he can completely invent that he made a deal with iran and it should go yes
he can completely invent that he made a deal with iran and it should go yes
and still resolve as YES
and still resolve as YES
the deal might be completely non existent
the deal might be completely non existent
his claim is good enough for the market, there doesn't need to be a deal
his claim is good enough for the market, there doesn't need to be a deal
he pretty much claims in the post the deal's finished and needs signing only
he pretty much claims in the post the deal's finished and needs signing only
he made a collection of statements today. Two tele-rallies, the oval, the post
he made a collection of statements today. Two tele-rallies, the oval, the post
But if the rule is permissive that's not our issue
But if the rule is permissive that's not our issue
The problem is not what happened is too formal, it's the RULE that is too permissive.
The problem is not what happened is too formal, it's the RULE that is too permissive.
But what we have fits the rule perfectly indeed
But what we have fits the rule perfectly indeed
Alternatively, you can do a single market with countries and targets
Alternatively, you can do a single market with countries and targets
like I suggested for Panama
like I suggested for Panama
Can we do # of goals ranges for a few countries? Tournament-wide
Can we do # of goals ranges for a few countries? Tournament-wide
KalshiTARIFFS
TARIFFS
TRANS GENDER
TRANS GENDER
TRANS GENDER
TRANS GENDER
Low Quality Lee Greenwood
Low Quality Lee Greenwood
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OH NO LEE GREENWOOD AGAIN
OH NO LEE GREENWOOD AGAIN
DEJAVU
DEJAVU
I WON IN A LANDSLIDE
I WON IN A LANDSLIDE
I LOVE ALABAMA
I LOVE ALABAMA
Trump invented a new form of Diplomacy Diplomatic Warfare
Trump invented a new form of Diplomacy Diplomatic Warfare
wtf
wtf
wait i'm not american
wait i'm not american
## AND IM PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN
## AND IM PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN
Will Iran score more goals than...? - USA - Iraq - Saudi Arabia - Qatar (resolves to 50:50 if same # of goals by elimination of both teams) <@1212792946341183578> <@1457826843766947977> <@1272383282687905939>
Will Iran score more goals than...? - USA - Iraq - Saudi Arabia - Qatar (resolves to 50:50 if same # of goals by elimination of both teams) <@1212792946341183578> <@1457826843766947977> <@1272383282687905939>
<@1272383282687905939> <@1457826843766947977> How many goals will Panama score during the World Cup? - 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 or more
<@1272383282687905939> <@1457826843766947977> How many goals will Panama score during the World Cup? - 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 or more
What is that GIF showing Car? You were targeting a commercial vessel and shot down an airplane instead?
What is that GIF showing Car? You were targeting a commercial vessel and shot down an airplane instead?
Polymarket will probably clarify YES because they'll feel YES side is wronged by the false premise. But that's that
Polymarket will probably clarify YES because they'll feel YES side is wronged by the false premise. But that's that
There is not even a fee on this market. You can wipe out that wall at 96c
There is not even a fee on this market. You can wipe out that wall at 96c
that's what I'm saying, 5% is a huge payout, if you're super certain
that's what I'm saying, 5% is a huge payout, if you're super certain
Free 4% is so juicy, go bond more
Free 4% is so juicy, go bond more
Whales have infinite money, they can bond up to 99.9 for 0.1% payout when they are certain. If you have so much certainty of a clarification, free 4% is very juicy, go get more.
Whales have infinite money, they can bond up to 99.9 for 0.1% payout when they are certain. If you have so much certainty of a clarification, free 4% is very juicy, go get more.
I love post-clarification debates, especially when I lose
I love post-clarification debates, especially when I lose
The argument is that Car is on YES so it must be a cuck
The argument is that Car is on YES so it must be a cuck
When he is referring to Project Freedom, he is referring to the same thing. According to Hegseth it never stopped, so all this activity is related to that. He commented on the success of this prior operation. Nothing new happened, it's been the same thing since before the market started. What the market expects has not been fulfilled.
When he is referring to Project Freedom, he is referring to the same thing. According to Hegseth it never stopped, so all this activity is related to that. He commented on the success of this prior operation. Nothing new happened, it's been the same thing since before the market started. What the market expects has not been fulfilled.
It's ongoing
It's ongoing
I'm pleased to announce that the operation we started back in May had an enormous Success, Thonker.
I'm pleased to announce that the operation we started back in May had an enormous Success, Thonker.