KalshiWhat year was that
What year was that
SJ参与话题 23消息总数 886
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 886 条，显示第 801-850 条Yeah nvm ban phones completely
Yeah nvm ban phones completely
yeah nvm let's ban phones
yeah nvm let's ban phones
High school a bit extreme though, idk what they're doing here though
High school a bit extreme though, idk what they're doing here though
I think banning before high school is fine/prob good
I think banning before high school is fine/prob good
Okay maybe people are that weird now, that makes 0 sense to me though
Okay maybe people are that weird now, that makes 0 sense to me though
Bro wants to sit there learning all day crine
Bro wants to sit there learning all day crine
Opposite lol
Opposite lol
Legit torture
Legit torture
Imagine not having phone in school
Imagine not having phone in school
I'm genuinely starting to feel bad for people who weren't trading in golden age lol
I'm genuinely starting to feel bad for people who weren't trading in golden age lol
Ossoff >>> Hochul
Ossoff >>> Hochul
Bro said it's going Y
Bro said it's going Y
It's not going no though
It's not going no though
Someone take the 100k
Someone take the 100k
**words blended from two words where parts of each are combined** (parts, definitely not any normal compound word or one that have not been introduced to the dictionary)
**words blended from two words where parts of each are combined** (parts, definitely not any normal compound word or one that have not been introduced to the dictionary)
MAGA-nificent for sure (it says it)
MAGA-nificent for sure (it says it)
I'm not convinced MAGAnificient should count, but I'm highly unsure.
I'm not convinced MAGAnificient should count, but I'm highly unsure.
Highly ambiguous what distinct unaltered element means with the trash examples! (all which use hyphens)
Highly ambiguous what distinct unaltered element means with the trash examples! (all which use hyphens)
I don't think portmanteaus should count though
I don't think portmanteaus should count though
If it was drone + airport, then yes, but I don't agree it is
If it was drone + airport, then yes, but I don't agree it is
Well that is stretching it
Well that is stretching it
It's not blending, it's just compounding
It's not blending, it's just compounding
I don't agree with that interpretation of what a portmanteau is
I don't agree with that interpretation of what a portmanteau is
I don't consider that a portmanteau either
I don't consider that a portmanteau either
No it's highly ambiguous
No it's highly ambiguous
I don't think portmanteaus should count
I don't think portmanteaus should count
Reuters made an error obviously
Reuters made an error obviously
Yes, the only way to correctly write it is MrBeast, that is his self-defined name
Yes, the only way to correctly write it is MrBeast, that is his self-defined name
Does not matter how he writes a term he did not create
Does not matter how he writes a term he did not create
Minor error obv
Minor error obv
Out-slip/outslip it's not a well defined word so both work
Out-slip/outslip it's not a well defined word so both work
Yes because it's unambiguously MrBeast
Yes because it's unambiguously MrBeast
Shii FAA got confused on this one
Shii FAA got confused on this one
Crine <@406522389921267722> ts over (mentions)
Crine <@406522389921267722> ts over (mentions)
No, I think both spellings make sense
No, I think both spellings make sense
Sniperport
Sniperport
If it becomes to a certain usage level, then we can officially decide on its form for mass adoption. It could be decided to be two words compound or both allowed like like firetruck / fire truck
If it becomes to a certain usage level, then we can officially decide on its form for mass adoption. It could be decided to be two words compound or both allowed like like firetruck / fire truck
Bro doesn’t know how words work
Bro doesn’t know how words work
What kind of port, sniper. What kind of port, drone
What kind of port, sniper. What kind of port, drone
Just like sniper port
Just like sniper port
No they don’t consider it a word but descriptive phrase
No they don’t consider it a word but descriptive phrase
It should be yes ofc
It should be yes ofc
Has to be a troll
Has to be a troll
Qualifying it would be fine though
Qualifying it would be fine though
Because it’s ridiculous to **disqualify** common usage based on some government usage
Because it’s ridiculous to **disqualify** common usage based on some government usage
Because it would be one of the most ridiculous resolutions ever
Because it would be one of the most ridiculous resolutions ever
Obviously yes since it’s correct
Obviously yes since it’s correct
There’s countless
There’s countless
Bro I’m on my phone I’m good
Bro I’m on my phone I’m good