KalshiVery possible. At what incidence rate are you saying it's disallowed. Let's count it.
Very possible. At what incidence rate are you saying it's disallowed. Let's count it.
SJ参与话题 23消息总数 883
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 883 条，显示第 51-100 条I have felt many smarts in my leg.
I have felt many smarts in my leg.
YEP!
YEP!
OED > Merriam. @every0ne knows this. WAY more detailed.
OED > Merriam. @every0ne knows this. WAY more detailed.
I agree. Should count. It exists. It's possible. It's in the dictionary.
I agree. Should count. It exists. It's possible. It's in the dictionary.
Obvious Y! Lfg!
Obvious Y! Lfg!
I have multiple resigns (grapes)
I have multiple resigns (grapes)
Resign?
Resign?
Has **THAT** line of thinking even been broking: 1) The noun exists (as a singular) 2) The noun's plural was said 3) Resolved N
Has **THAT** line of thinking even been broking: 1) The noun exists (as a singular) 2) The noun's plural was said 3) Resolved N
Yes
Yes
Hmm then different.
Hmm then different.
If so, it should count IMO.
If so, it should count IMO.
Does a noun "economic" exist with the plural "economics"
Does a noun "economic" exist with the plural "economics"
So this has been broken, correct?
So this has been broken, correct?
**EXISTS**
**EXISTS**
If it's **POSSIBLE** to be a noun and that noun pluralizes as what was said, it should count period
If it's **POSSIBLE** to be a noun and that noun pluralizes as what was said, it should count period
yeah the contract has many many many errors
yeah the contract has many many many errors
Nutmeg is a spice.
Nutmeg is a spice.
If the cutoff is not 100%/50%, what is it?
If the cutoff is not 100%/50%, what is it?
It either can be or can't
It either can be or can't
Because if it has a 1/100M chance of being a valid noun, it should count then
Because if it has a 1/100M chance of being a valid noun, it should count then
Has that happened under the new contract?
Has that happened under the new contract?
Interesting
Interesting
Now? No one writes it as "ex, wye, zee"
Now? No one writes it as "ex, wye, zee"
But in practice, it's being used to determine the set of valid ways to write something
But in practice, it's being used to determine the set of valid ways to write something
It acts like it's for determining compounds in practice
It acts like it's for determining compounds in practice
I mean the problem is the contract weirdly writes the OED/Merriam clause
I mean the problem is the contract weirdly writes the OED/Merriam clause
Wdym exactly
Wdym exactly
Let's use the OED frequency. Everyone has to subscribe.
Let's use the OED frequency. Everyone has to subscribe.
Unless you take the *first* spelling or something per a dictionary
Unless you take the *first* spelling or something per a dictionary
Prob, cuz it's hard to define where to cut it off otherwise
Prob, cuz it's hard to define where to cut it off otherwise
Better betting than doomscrolling.
Better betting than doomscrolling.
New strikes: Ex, Oh, Bee, Aye
New strikes: Ex, Oh, Bee, Aye
Strike: Jon Announcers: "Oh, hey, Jo[h/]n" (in the crowd, unidentifiable)
Strike: Jon Announcers: "Oh, hey, Jo[h/]n" (in the crowd, unidentifiable)
And the "1" is the strike
And the "1" is the strike
Like what if it's a 1:3 ratio spelling
Like what if it's a 1:3 ratio spelling
versus what would
versus what would
Yeah, what do you think should happen though
Yeah, what do you think should happen though
Why not, it's complely valid, just happens to be way less common
Why not, it's complely valid, just happens to be way less common
Let's not do probabilistic outcomes.
Let's not do probabilistic outcomes.
Nah let's go YES! It's possible he meant Jordyn!
Nah let's go YES! It's possible he meant Jordyn!
But what if it were the other way
But what if it were the other way
Okay well I agree it should count, because Jordan is much mroe common
Okay well I agree it should count, because Jordan is much mroe common
What if they just said randomly "Man, Jord[a/y]'n is a great player" and then didn't say another word and moved to the next play
What if they just said randomly "Man, Jord[a/y]'n is a great player" and then didn't say another word and moved to the next play
Def can't use audio bytes to resolve
Def can't use audio bytes to resolve
Context def always matters, which they look at in these cases
Context def always matters, which they look at in these cases
It's a completely different word and is 0% relevant because no one ever said it
It's a completely different word and is 0% relevant because no one ever said it
Yeah but it makes complete sense, "Jordan" was objectively not said
Yeah but it makes complete sense, "Jordan" was objectively not said
Wdym? Jordan was not said thus it doesn't count
Wdym? Jordan was not said thus it doesn't count
Let's go with Rabbit Y. You know what he meant.
Let's go with Rabbit Y. You know what he meant.