nytimes had 63.14% this morning, then changed to 60% without adding any new votes
nytimes had 63.14% this morning, then changed to 60% without adding any new votes
该用户的聊天记录定位。
nytimes had 63.14% this morning, then changed to 60% without adding any new votes
nytimes had 63.14% this morning, then changed to 60% without adding any new votes
and i think they're still too low
and i think they're still too low
fwiw nytimes and ddhq both upped their estimates earlier today
fwiw nytimes and ddhq both upped their estimates earlier today
well concrete is stretching it - a better estimate than any news agency can give is a better description
well concrete is stretching it - a better estimate than any news agency can give is a better description
will prob get those soon
will prob get those soon
there isn't concrete numbers from the county yet
there isn't concrete numbers from the county yet
nytimes went from 60 -> 63.47%
nytimes went from 60 -> 63.47%
28718 votes
28718 votes
8961 raman 5967 pratt
8961 raman 5967 pratt
ideas will probably be calling fraud still
ideas will probably be calling fraud still
alright now they're in
alright now they're in
oops i was false alarmed
oops i was false alarmed
i was happy to buy raman advance and raman win since they were both +ev
i was happy to buy raman advance and raman win since they were both +ev
yeah the pricing was definitely a bit off on those markets relatively i think
yeah the pricing was definitely a bit off on those markets relatively i think
don't really care to minmax main market and correlated markets though
don't really care to minmax main market and correlated markets though
my median is prob like 30 though
my median is prob like 30 though
prob a bit conditional on the final margin, granted i don't think there is too much variance there
prob a bit conditional on the final margin, granted i don't think there is too much variance there
i woke up
i woke up