PolymarketConsensus without any logic? Market ends in Jan On chain data also shows sale on 26th May
Consensus without any logic? Market ends in Jan On chain data also shows sale on 26th May
Paarth参与话题 2消息总数 212
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 212 条，显示第 151-200 条I want to know what is the logic behind it being yes Not even a single statement from polymarket
I want to know what is the logic behind it being yes Not even a single statement from polymarket
0.3c😃
0.3c😃
No.. Rules say when was it sold, not when it will resolve/end
No.. Rules say when was it sold, not when it will resolve/end
Where was it mentioned?
Where was it mentioned?
Why was it proposed way before the market end date?
Why was it proposed way before the market end date?
The market wasn't even supposed to end so early... What do ppl have to say against this? The end date was july/jan
The market wasn't even supposed to end so early... What do ppl have to say against this? The end date was july/jan
Its gambling when the outcome is already known?
Its gambling when the outcome is already known?
Lmao
Lmao
No clarification is needed if it changes the fundamental of the market And no one put money on no thinking that if they sell but dont announce in timeframe I will win
No clarification is needed if it changes the fundamental of the market And no one put money on no thinking that if they sell but dont announce in timeframe I will win
<@336497005096337408> i lost nearly 400 bec of ppl like u
<@336497005096337408> i lost nearly 400 bec of ppl like u
It was after the event timeframe ended Market is due to end in July or Jan
It was after the event timeframe ended Market is due to end in July or Jan
Wait no
Wait no
Yes
Yes
And there was on chain evidence from May 26
And there was on chain evidence from May 26
The clarification doesn't stand bec clarification can not fundamentally change the intent of the question It changed the question from will they sell to will they announce if they sell The clarification doesnt stand bec it went against poly docs
The clarification doesn't stand bec clarification can not fundamentally change the intent of the question It changed the question from will they sell to will they announce if they sell The clarification doesnt stand bec it went against poly docs
Tf
Tf
Bm refresh
Bm refresh
Bm nickname
Bm nickname
Bm verify 0x5135688045CA947e91F5A89Ead59b5b91f2bA110
Bm verify 0x5135688045CA947e91F5A89Ead59b5b91f2bA110
Bm verify
Bm verify
...
...
Bm refresh
Bm refresh
It is
It is
Market end date: 1st Jan Event: MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by 31st May They sold Bitcoin, on chain proof exists since 26th May Micro strategy confirmed it on June 1st Market was supposed to end on 1st Jan, so why was it resolved on 1st June? And why was an additional rule added after the event took place...? Additional clarification can not fundamentally change the intent of the question Here it did, from 'will they sell Bitcoin", it became "will they announce if they sold Bitcoin"...
Market end date: 1st Jan Event: MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by 31st May They sold Bitcoin, on chain proof exists since 26th May Micro strategy confirmed it on June 1st Market was supposed to end on 1st Jan, so why was it resolved on 1st June? And why was an additional rule added after the event took place...? Additional clarification can not fundamentally change the intent of the question Here it did, from 'will they sell Bitcoin", it became "will they announce if they sold Bitcoin"...
Market end date: 1st Jan Event: MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by 31st May They sold Bitcoin, on chain proof exists since 26th May Micro strategy confirmed it on June 1st Market was supposed to end on 1st Jan, so why was it resolved on 1st June? And why was an additional rule added after the event took place...? Additional clarification can not fundamentally change the intent of the question Here it did, from 'will they sell Bitcoin", it became "will they announce if they sold Bitcoin"...
Market end date: 1st Jan Event: MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by 31st May They sold Bitcoin, on chain proof exists since 26th May Micro strategy confirmed it on June 1st Market was supposed to end on 1st Jan, so why was it resolved on 1st June? And why was an additional rule added after the event took place...? Additional clarification can not fundamentally change the intent of the question Here it did, from 'will they sell Bitcoin", it became "will they announce if they sold Bitcoin"...
And why are we supposed to see all of that? I see the rules I see the end date I bet If resolution is out by the end, it should have proof If not, wait till end date Else dont mention an end date, whats its point!?
And why are we supposed to see all of that? I see the rules I see the end date I bet If resolution is out by the end, it should have proof If not, wait till end date Else dont mention an end date, whats its point!?
No Whats jan 1st for?
No Whats jan 1st for?
1. It was never meant to be resolved 2. The dispute was bec of the on chain proof of transaction, something anyone could have accessed b4 31st may
1. It was never meant to be resolved 2. The dispute was bec of the on chain proof of transaction, something anyone could have accessed b4 31st may
The market end date anyways was 1st july or Jan Why did it have to resolve so early
The market end date anyways was 1st july or Jan Why did it have to resolve so early
It is a scam Market end date wasn't even may or June So doesn't make sense for it to resolve now unless they knew for sure...
It is a scam Market end date wasn't even may or June So doesn't make sense for it to resolve now unless they knew for sure...
Currency?
Currency?
Exactly
Exactly
Poly will face WAY lower backlash from the no side if they resolve it as a yes and say it was an error to add the additional context...?
Poly will face WAY lower backlash from the no side if they resolve it as a yes and say it was an error to add the additional context...?
Thats just the volume I buy $100 5 times sell it 4 times counts the volume as 900 But actual shares are just 100...
Thats just the volume I buy $100 5 times sell it 4 times counts the volume as 900 But actual shares are just 100...
UMA😂😂
UMA😂😂
Who is this guy with 15M on no!?
Who is this guy with 15M on no!?
?
?
Russian hackers r unhappy of the micro strategy resolution?😂
Russian hackers r unhappy of the micro strategy resolution?😂
Method u use for login/sign up
Method u use for login/sign up
Seems to be for all
Seems to be for all
Nah They aint gonna cheap out Claude ftw
Nah They aint gonna cheap out Claude ftw
😂🤞🏻
😂🤞🏻
They use UMA too?
They use UMA too?
Lmaooo
Lmaooo
I really do appreciate the concern and help Thank u!
I really do appreciate the concern and help Thank u!
What if the UMA whales r waiting for yes to hit 0.1c And then flip UMA a few seconds after buying ALL yes shares on sale...? Am coping, but is it possible?😂😂
What if the UMA whales r waiting for yes to hit 0.1c And then flip UMA a few seconds after buying ALL yes shares on sale...? Am coping, but is it possible?😂😂
What did they do with the russia Ukraine ceasefire market?
What did they do with the russia Ukraine ceasefire market?
But then clarification cant change the market fundamental And the end date isn't even here yet They just did something very dumb on their side, and need to fix it...
But then clarification cant change the market fundamental And the end date isn't even here yet They just did something very dumb on their side, and need to fix it...
But they have gone against UMA Am betting on them going against UMA, not on the event or rules😂 I sound really dumb now😭😭
But they have gone against UMA Am betting on them going against UMA, not on the event or rules😂 I sound really dumb now😭😭