Polymarketyou couldve disputed
you couldve disputed
Jul参与话题 2消息总数 206
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 206 条，显示第 101-150 条so it stands
so it stands
but polymarket cant change the outcome tbh, denmark was proposed and nobody disputed
but polymarket cant change the outcome tbh, denmark was proposed and nobody disputed
thats interesting
thats interesting
oh no youre right lmao
oh no youre right lmao
for denmark it still shows i think
for denmark it still shows i think
the rule about cancelled matches is for matches that are cancelled in advance, and not even started
the rule about cancelled matches is for matches that are cancelled in advance, and not even started
there is no set rule on abandoned matches in the rules of the market, but the precedent is, that if the primary resolution source recognize the score, then it will be resolved as such
there is no set rule on abandoned matches in the rules of the market, but the precedent is, that if the primary resolution source recognize the score, then it will be resolved as such
tried to save yall money
tried to save yall money
tried to tell yall yday
tried to tell yall yday
cancelled is not the same as abandoned
cancelled is not the same as abandoned
at least no decision that feels right, so the most intuitive decision is to validate the score that the game had at abandonment
at least no decision that feels right, so the most intuitive decision is to validate the score that the game had at abandonment
there is no right decision here
there is no right decision here
which would be unfair for denmark
which would be unfair for denmark
its just an argument that doesnt make sense
its just an argument that doesnt make sense
okay, we will see but just to sum up your side we should count this as a draw, because it is unfair for ukraine to not get the chance at turning the game around but its not unfair for denmark to lose points even though theyre ahead, because they couldve lost still in the match
okay, we will see but just to sum up your side we should count this as a draw, because it is unfair for ukraine to not get the chance at turning the game around but its not unfair for denmark to lose points even though theyre ahead, because they couldve lost still in the match
saw reports that he left the pitch himself and is fine, so thats good to know
saw reports that he left the pitch himself and is fine, so thats good to know
yea for sure thats the main thing
yea for sure thats the main thing
thats why youre saying it
thats why youre saying it
because it would make you moeny
because it would make you moeny
yea but they could also likely just keep the win? so why would you make any assumptions that it would change
yea but they could also likely just keep the win? so why would you make any assumptions that it would change
this isnt a morroco senegal situation where the players left to protest or some stuff like that
this isnt a morroco senegal situation where the players left to protest or some stuff like that
couldve subbed out eriksen in theory and played on
couldve subbed out eriksen in theory and played on
it also wasnt denmark that abandoned the game, the officials did
it also wasnt denmark that abandoned the game, the officials did
okay and then using your logic, does denmark deserve to get less ranking points even though theyre ahead?
okay and then using your logic, does denmark deserve to get less ranking points even though theyre ahead?
pretty straight forwards imo, but the rules have to be way clearer to prevent stuff like this
pretty straight forwards imo, but the rules have to be way clearer to prevent stuff like this
like what exactly is ukraine losing?
like what exactly is ukraine losing?
i can actually, since what is the downside in losing in a friendly?
i can actually, since what is the downside in losing in a friendly?
but of course there can be things that i cant know
but of course there can be things that i cant know
having both traded the right side of the nantes, and the microstrategy market i feel like i understand some of the precedents
having both traded the right side of the nantes, and the microstrategy market i feel like i understand some of the precedents
yea same i understand your point, im just doing the same
yea same i understand your point, im just doing the same
you outplayed me there lmao
you outplayed me there lmao
pretty funny though
pretty funny though
i mean we will see tomorrow
i mean we will see tomorrow
<:dead:1013832272933298176>
<:dead:1013832272933298176>
did toulouse deserve to not get a chance at 3 points when the game had to be cancelled in minute 25?
did toulouse deserve to not get a chance at 3 points when the game had to be cancelled in minute 25?
not saying that, but what other option is there
not saying that, but what other option is there
exactly my point
exactly my point
were yall on yes on the microstrategy market aswell?
were yall on yes on the microstrategy market aswell?
you wouldnt say you abandon a match when you cancel it a day in advance
you wouldnt say you abandon a match when you cancel it a day in advance
clearly they arent
clearly they arent
they will follow the primary resolution source, which is fifa
they will follow the primary resolution source, which is fifa
nope, there is nothing in the rules about abanddoned games
nope, there is nothing in the rules about abanddoned games
its too late for me to have this discussion man
its too late for me to have this discussion man
abandoned, not cancelled
abandoned, not cancelled
game was cancelled, not abandoned which are two different things
game was cancelled, not abandoned which are two different things
just like it was up to the french league if they recognize the 0-0 after nantes toulouse game had to be abandoned in the 25th minute
just like it was up to the french league if they recognize the 0-0 after nantes toulouse game had to be abandoned in the 25th minute
there is no limit, its up to fifa
there is no limit, its up to fifa
at least my point is
at least my point is
the point is, there is no reason not to recognize it
the point is, there is no reason not to recognize it