Hyperliquidtrump rhymes with pump and dump
trump rhymes with pump and dump
shuri参与话题 58消息总数 4625
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 4625 条，显示第 2651-2700 条trump rhymes with dump and pump
trump rhymes with dump and pump
HYPE Bullishly descending to 0
HYPE Bullishly descending to 0
left it at 120k
left it at 120k
if hype trades at 70 my sanity will be on sale
if hype trades at 70 my sanity will be on sale
If Bitcoin trades at 70k my weekend will be canceled <:cocoa:1262861428759461999>
If Bitcoin trades at 70k my weekend will be canceled <:cocoa:1262861428759461999>
too bad his liquidators win <a:clown1:1335536916166344714>
too bad his liquidators win <a:clown1:1335536916166344714>
he will be right given infinite margin
he will be right given infinite margin
another win for james wynn
another win for james wynn
That cost of unreliability: if you dont take the risk, someone else has to. ADL merely forces it upon the other side of your trade. The higher the risk of ADL, the less tight spreads and thickness liquidity can afford on an exchange, and it will likely lead to overall downgrading experience.
That cost of unreliability: if you dont take the risk, someone else has to. ADL merely forces it upon the other side of your trade. The higher the risk of ADL, the less tight spreads and thickness liquidity can afford on an exchange, and it will likely lead to overall downgrading experience.
You are imposing risk upon solvency, triggering more ADL scenarios which is net bad UX for all traders
You are imposing risk upon solvency, triggering more ADL scenarios which is net bad UX for all traders
I already talked about the edge cases above re "unreliable", just read
I already talked about the edge cases above re "unreliable", just read
During normal smooth trading conditions these are same thing
During normal smooth trading conditions these are same thing
You wanted $985 "locked" $15 initial $10 maintenance or something You can just set stop loss at $10 or $15 drawdown
You wanted $985 "locked" $15 initial $10 maintenance or something You can just set stop loss at $10 or $15 drawdown
Of course they aren't... but for all intents and purposes of what you demand/are proposing, they effectively are???
Of course they aren't... but for all intents and purposes of what you demand/are proposing, they effectively are???
whats the difference
whats the difference
or $15 minus max slippage if u like
or $15 minus max slippage if u like
$1k in your balance, set stop loss for $15 drawdown
$1k in your balance, set stop loss for $15 drawdown
<#1087879542049357935>
<#1087879542049357935>
I am literally saying apart from edge cases, what you want should be no different from setting a stop loss while trading
I am literally saying apart from edge cases, what you want should be no different from setting a stop loss while trading
= During 'normal' trading conditions, given smooth enough PA and enough liquidity, there should be no difference between what you're proposing and just setting an SL at the appropriate price. So I fail to see what great benefit this has.
= During 'normal' trading conditions, given smooth enough PA and enough liquidity, there should be no difference between what you're proposing and just setting an SL at the appropriate price. So I fail to see what great benefit this has.
1. This is quite far from what you initially demanded in the original post, and not what most people understand by "200x leverage" 2. The main difference between what you're proposing and just setting a stop loss in the existing system is that during price teleports that go over your initial margin, you would be ADL'd instead of normally liquidated and losing more. Let's say you need to be liquidated for a loss of $20 due to a large price teleport / unavailable book liquidity. But with what you're proposing, only $15 is at risk, and therefore ADL needs to happen This sounds net unhealthy to the protocol to me.
1. This is quite far from what you initially demanded in the original post, and not what most people understand by "200x leverage" 2. The main difference between what you're proposing and just setting a stop loss in the existing system is that during price teleports that go over your initial margin, you would be ADL'd instead of normally liquidated and losing more. Let's say you need to be liquidated for a loss of $20 due to a large price teleport / unavailable book liquidity. But with what you're proposing, only $15 is at risk, and therefore ADL needs to happen This sounds net unhealthy to the protocol to me.
You can literally do this yourself with $1000 anyways by setting a stop loss 0.25% or whatever it is away
You can literally do this yourself with $1000 anyways by setting a stop loss 0.25% or whatever it is away
This benefits the trader in having a more favourable liquidation, but increases systematic risk re: sudden price movements.
This benefits the trader in having a more favourable liquidation, but increases systematic risk re: sudden price movements.
200x on $10, that's $2k notional Sounds like Initial leverage 2x on $1k while we have Maintenance leverage 400x
200x on $10, that's $2k notional Sounds like Initial leverage 2x on $1k while we have Maintenance leverage 400x
if you ask me, that's just another way of saying initial margin?
if you ask me, that's just another way of saying initial margin?
So you're proposing that 990 literally cannot be used for anything
So you're proposing that 990 literally cannot be used for anything
???????????
???????????
if you can open 200x on $10 margin, isolated or not, my question is what are you allowing with the other 990???
if you can open 200x on $10 margin, isolated or not, my question is what are you allowing with the other 990???
we are back to square one in terms of the problem
we are back to square one in terms of the problem
ok 100 isolated positions of $10 ?
ok 100 isolated positions of $10 ?
sounds like recipe for 10/10 disaster, a large part of the cascade was driven by the amount of cross margin contamination in liquidations across market
sounds like recipe for 10/10 disaster, a large part of the cascade was driven by the amount of cross margin contamination in liquidations across market
100 cross positions of $10 margin each totalling 1k margin
100 cross positions of $10 margin each totalling 1k margin
the only use such a feature would have for you is if you want to open 100 cross positions ?
the only use such a feature would have for you is if you want to open 100 cross positions ?
sounds like we might as well take whatever margin makes that 40x and call it a day
sounds like we might as well take whatever margin makes that 40x and call it a day
surely he can pay his debts with elon bucks
surely he can pay his debts with elon bucks
1m followers blue tick
1m followers blue tick
we do a lil sniffin here and there
we do a lil sniffin here and there
same
same
anyone?
anyone?
> Cant you just cap it depending on how much you actually have sleeping on ur acc ? what the hell does this even mean
> Cant you just cap it depending on how much you actually have sleeping on ur acc ? what the hell does this even mean
feds will get u
feds will get u
<#1030197017655394447>
<#1030197017655394447>
ofc ofc
ofc ofc
wasting my time arguing into a 200x lev trader with self proclaimed great risk management
wasting my time arguing into a 200x lev trader with self proclaimed great risk management
bruh this is just arguing into a wall, fakking hell
bruh this is just arguing into a wall, fakking hell
> Cant you just cap it depending on how much you actually have sleeping on ur acc ?
> Cant you just cap it depending on how much you actually have sleeping on ur acc ?
no thank you
no thank you
it only takes one 3rd party builder to let dumb retail do this btw 👍
it only takes one 3rd party builder to let dumb retail do this btw 👍
You didn't remember the replies to this point, but never mind
You didn't remember the replies to this point, but never mind