Hyperliquidonly if you choose to read it that way
only if you choose to read it that way
shuri参与话题 58消息总数 4625
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 4625 条，显示第 3201-3250 条didn't know you were referring to not me...
didn't know you were referring to not me...
thank you.
thank you.
https://colossus.com/article/beyond-the-sky-jeffrey-yan-hyperliquid/
https://colossus.com/article/beyond-the-sky-jeffrey-yan-hyperliquid/
I would not be asking for a 'public' clarification about the aave protocol within the ethereum discord
I would not be asking for a 'public' clarification about the aave protocol within the ethereum discord
tradexyz is 3rd party with respect to hyperliquid
tradexyz is 3rd party with respect to hyperliquid
Their profile doesn't suggest to me they are acting officially in here either, even if they are team/etc
Their profile doesn't suggest to me they are acting officially in here either, even if they are team/etc
This is the Hyperliquid discord, and indeed, it's not completely clear to me that user is even official staff of xyz or what role they play on their team if they are
This is the Hyperliquid discord, and indeed, it's not completely clear to me that user is even official staff of xyz or what role they play on their team if they are
'Public' would be on their official twitter or their docs
'Public' would be on their official twitter or their docs
This is not the correct place though
This is not the correct place though
rather than pinging one person in here???
rather than pinging one person in here???
This is not the xyz discord / customer support - you should be asking there?
This is not the xyz discord / customer support - you should be asking there?
If it matters to you because you trade on xyz, I highly advise asking them to clarify
If it matters to you because you trade on xyz, I highly advise asking them to clarify
If I were to trade on any market I would not be trading where it is uncertain what they will do to the oracle in such scenarios. If you ask me 'may' is even worse a quantifier
If I were to trade on any market I would not be trading where it is uncertain what they will do to the oracle in such scenarios. If you ask me 'may' is even worse a quantifier
if their docs fail to be clear on it, then I would highly advise asking them to clarify it before trading
if their docs fail to be clear on it, then I would highly advise asking them to clarify it before trading
what will happen should happen exactly as their docs state
what will happen should happen exactly as their docs state
why btc dump everything else nuke
why btc dump everything else nuke
100 HYPE ty
100 HYPE ty
Can someone sell me a Hypurr below top offer please I am priced out <:sadcat:1084719102448373810>
Can someone sell me a Hypurr below top offer please I am priced out <:sadcat:1084719102448373810>
its not rocket science to understand this.
its not rocket science to understand this.
price per share is price per share
price per share is price per share
which thankfully xyz is not
which thankfully xyz is not
whats completely broken is an unclear market
whats completely broken is an unclear market
all i smell is a major fud campaign here coming from their traders, potentially
all i smell is a major fud campaign here coming from their traders, potentially
aster chooses whether they wanna rebase or not whenever, and traders don't know beforehand? 😆
aster chooses whether they wanna rebase or not whenever, and traders don't know beforehand? 😆
that's awful, and i sure as hell am not trading on there
that's awful, and i sure as hell am not trading on there
what
what
which is clearly completely undesirable for any trader
which is clearly completely undesirable for any trader
so aster changed the rules of their market halfway through?
so aster changed the rules of their market halfway through?
wait what
wait what
then aster didn't 'rebase' presumably
then aster didn't 'rebase' presumably
they said it would track price per share so that's exactly what it should / will do 👍
they said it would track price per share so that's exactly what it should / will do 👍
if they rebased it out of nowhere they would truly be guilty for going against what they initially stated their market traded.
if they rebased it out of nowhere they would truly be guilty for going against what they initially stated their market traded.
If you want to have a proper debate, it could be about why an oracle tracking shares rather than cap is dumb, which I might agree with (and therefore decide not to trade on markets like xyz's), but if you're accusing them of being dishonest about what their product is, then I will simply accuse you of being dumb or blind
If you want to have a proper debate, it could be about why an oracle tracking shares rather than cap is dumb, which I might agree with (and therefore decide not to trade on markets like xyz's), but if you're accusing them of being dishonest about what their product is, then I will simply accuse you of being dumb or blind
reads to me you are refusing to engage in proper conversation which you don't have a counterargument against but goes against your views
reads to me you are refusing to engage in proper conversation which you don't have a counterargument against but goes against your views
you are trading contracts here
you are trading contracts here
there is no share/token being 'given', what
there is no share/token being 'given', what
There have been plenty of previous examples of various edge case mechanisms causing a loud minority to 'complain' because they did not understand them beforehand / had never seen them before, like ADL of perpetual markets.
There have been plenty of previous examples of various edge case mechanisms causing a loud minority to 'complain' because they did not understand them beforehand / had never seen them before, like ADL of perpetual markets.
However, it seems to me the majority in notional size seem to understand the market since markets are democracies in their own way, and tradexyz's spcx seems to me to have moved in the expected direction it should have if you understood what it was trading
However, it seems to me the majority in notional size seem to understand the market since markets are democracies in their own way, and tradexyz's spcx seems to me to have moved in the expected direction it should have if you understood what it was trading
'so many' is not a very quantitative indicator. We have maybe 5 users in this chat today? In addition, despite warnings and documentation I find it unsurprising if there are traders in any market who don't actually fully understand its mechanisms and are subsequently caught out and complain when it goes opposite to their expectations.
'so many' is not a very quantitative indicator. We have maybe 5 users in this chat today? In addition, despite warnings and documentation I find it unsurprising if there are traders in any market who don't actually fully understand its mechanisms and are subsequently caught out and complain when it goes opposite to their expectations.
really? but from what porhto has shared in this chat so far, it seems the official information has never changed with regards to what you are trading : implied price per share.
really? but from what porhto has shared in this chat so far, it seems the official information has never changed with regards to what you are trading : implied price per share.
their UI currently seems clear enough to me
their UI currently seems clear enough to me
if you failed to comprehend what you are trading, then there is either a failure of the documentation or a failure of your understanding or both in the case of SPCX on xyz, the screenshots/info shared with me seem clear enough.
if you failed to comprehend what you are trading, then there is either a failure of the documentation or a failure of your understanding or both in the case of SPCX on xyz, the screenshots/info shared with me seem clear enough.
spot tokens, stocks, derivatives, whatever
spot tokens, stocks, derivatives, whatever
there are plenty of similarly or even samely named products on different exchanges that are different
there are plenty of similarly or even samely named products on different exchanges that are different
you might assume they are related, but you should always check the documentation and be sure of what you are trading
you might assume they are related, but you should always check the documentation and be sure of what you are trading
the name being the same on 2 exchanges has never made two products the same
the name being the same on 2 exchanges has never made two products the same
if you cannot understand the difference between products even now, then i highly suggest you avoid trading on any platform until you do, since trading something what you are not understanding is more likely to lose you money
if you cannot understand the difference between products even now, then i highly suggest you avoid trading on any platform until you do, since trading something what you are not understanding is more likely to lose you money
and they are therefore incomparable
and they are therefore incomparable
the fact is the 'other exchanges' you are referring to have listed an effectively different product to what tradexyz listed
the fact is the 'other exchanges' you are referring to have listed an effectively different product to what tradexyz listed