PolymarketYoure arguing with the wrong guy here
Youre arguing with the wrong guy here
FloatyBoi参与话题 11消息总数 503
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 503 条，显示第 401-450 条Not fitting the intent and how it was historically resolved
Not fitting the intent and how it was historically resolved
It was unfair and badly worded rules
It was unfair and badly worded rules
Yeah
Yeah
In general they are yes. Not here though
In general they are yes. Not here though
Thats why all the big players knew it would resolve NO
Thats why all the big players knew it would resolve NO
but the markets intent wasnt that
but the markets intent wasnt that
As I said
As I said
Yeah they sold it by that date xd
Yeah they sold it by that date xd
Not that it was fair
Not that it was fair
Im saying I knew it would resolve down
Im saying I knew it would resolve down
Im not
Im not
And the rules
And the rules
The title counts
The title counts
Choose any market on poly. THat "end date" will be wrong
Choose any market on poly. THat "end date" will be wrong
Thats why i also bought no
Thats why i also bought no
You can X all you want but thats how it worked xd
You can X all you want but thats how it worked xd
Not on monday, when the confirmation came in
Not on monday, when the confirmation came in
"..by May 31, 2026". The market ended on that day.
"..by May 31, 2026". The market ended on that day.
No the market ended when it was first proposed
No the market ended when it was first proposed
Theres no arguing that the wording of the rules sucked and scammed people yeah.
Theres no arguing that the wording of the rules sucked and scammed people yeah.
Yes because lots of people that didnt know bought yes
Yes because lots of people that didnt know bought yes
Correct. Thats why people got screwed. But the market (and all the other microstrategy markets) always resolved based on confirmation
Correct. Thats why people got screwed. But the market (and all the other microstrategy markets) always resolved based on confirmation
Or the intent of the rules
Or the intent of the rules
Thats why the rules suck
Thats why the rules suck
Yep
Yep
The rules were worded badly in that it wasnt clear that the sell needed to be confirmed
The rules were worded badly in that it wasnt clear that the sell needed to be confirmed
The market was only open because of the dispute
The market was only open because of the dispute
The market ended on sunday. Then it got disputed and we got the confirmation they sold on monday.
The market ended on sunday. Then it got disputed and we got the confirmation they sold on monday.
I myself believe the correct resolution was in fact NO. Since it would set a very bad precedent to let disputes extend the market window.
I myself believe the correct resolution was in fact NO. Since it would set a very bad precedent to let disputes extend the market window.
Therefore the price on poly started to reflect that
Therefore the price on poly started to reflect that
Well the people that discussed it came to the conclusion that its a coinflip
Well the people that discussed it came to the conclusion that its a coinflip
Up to clarification
Up to clarification
And it became clear that its basically a coinflip
And it became clear that its basically a coinflip
The price shifted in favour of no as people discussed it more.
The price shifted in favour of no as people discussed it more.
But when a market is suspiciously 50/50 you can assume something you dont know about applies
But when a market is suspiciously 50/50 you can assume something you dont know about applies
The people not in the know "just reading rules" got screwed by that
The people not in the know "just reading rules" got screwed by that
That knew it would resolve down based on precedent
That knew it would resolve down based on precedent
the biggest winners were mostly the already big fish
the biggest winners were mostly the already big fish
But you get the error for that so you can handle it
But you get the error for that so you can handle it
Ghost stuff is fine, for me at least. But lots of orders are timing out and not being placed
Ghost stuff is fine, for me at least. But lots of orders are timing out and not being placed
And make a pretty penny because of that
And make a pretty penny because of that
The people that have been here for longer usually always know how they will clarify
The people that have been here for longer usually always know how they will clarify
Technically not insider trading since they arent supposed to trade
Technically not insider trading since they arent supposed to trade
No they clarify according to their intent with the market. But yeah clarifications are just up to vibes.
No they clarify according to their intent with the market. But yeah clarifications are just up to vibes.
So it wasnt clear
So it wasnt clear
But the rules were worded badly
But the rules were worded badly
Yeah and thats the main argument for the no position. Technically after the previous monday no should have been at 99c
Yeah and thats the main argument for the no position. Technically after the previous monday no should have been at 99c
<@348553079282466821> says its his fault but idk if hes just trolling
<@348553079282466821> says its his fault but idk if hes just trolling
Order timed out has been very bad lately yep
Order timed out has been very bad lately yep