Polymarketgravia does, bonereaper paid $863K till date!
gravia does, bonereaper paid $863K till date!
akkideutscher | gravia.trade参与话题 3消息总数 127
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 127 条，显示第 51-100 条pinging you separately to dig deeper into this, thanks for the suggestion
pinging you separately to dig deeper into this, thanks for the suggestion
super thanks for the kind words, deeply appreciate it. gives the team motivation each day to continue iterating <:pepe_thanks:1349089802078654499>
super thanks for the kind words, deeply appreciate it. gives the team motivation each day to continue iterating <:pepe_thanks:1349089802078654499>
it does the former too, though it's buggy for some accounts with historic positions that are unredeemed. fixing this soon.
it does the former too, though it's buggy for some accounts with historic positions that are unredeemed. fixing this soon.
you mean value of cash + open positions? or realtime pnl tracking with day-level splits and stuff?
you mean value of cash + open positions? or realtime pnl tracking with day-level splits and stuff?
Folks that lost the most money buying 99c in crypto up/down (past 7d); top most one actually bet 7.52k at 99c and lost it all!
Folks that lost the most money buying 99c in crypto up/down (past 7d); top most one actually bet 7.52k at 99c and lost it all!
yes, it's been fixed now, thanks ⚡
yes, it's been fixed now, thanks ⚡
Has this been fixed? Some of our users are still getting it, thanks!
Has this been fixed? Some of our users are still getting it, thanks!
he was, but not since the past 2 days. other platforms are underreporting fees, hence the PnL seems higher elsewhere.
he was, but not since the past 2 days. other platforms are underreporting fees, hence the PnL seems higher elsewhere.
you can get referral rewards earned/day/user, but no way to find out who referred whom
you can get referral rewards earned/day/user, but no way to find out who referred whom
Couple of bonders already deployed decent size (99c+ positions) - some of them have negative all time PnL though
Couple of bonders already deployed decent size (99c+ positions) - some of them have negative all time PnL though
could share a dump of your trades and wV calculation basis it. you could raise it with Poly as to why it doesn't make you eligible. they would only know!
could share a dump of your trades and wV calculation basis it. you could raise it with Poly as to why it doesn't make you eligible. they would only know!
yeah, have seen it happen. accounts with barely any volume and obsidian.
yeah, have seen it happen. accounts with barely any volume and obsidian.
then you could check the wV and see if you qualify. again, it's basis on-chain trades and poly's documentation.
then you could check the wV and see if you qualify. again, it's basis on-chain trades and poly's documentation.
the tiers are not matching what they should basis wV for a bunch of users. more than an exploit, it seems to be a bug on poly's end (they should be fixing it soon imo).
the tiers are not matching what they should basis wV for a bunch of users. more than an exploit, it seems to be a bug on poly's end (they should be fixing it soon imo).
you should have the icon under the polymarket pfp. to see your wV from on-chain trade data, you can try https://gravia.trade/check-taker-tier
you should have the icon under the polymarket pfp. to see your wV from on-chain trade data, you can try https://gravia.trade/check-taker-tier
Top bonders from the past 30d within mention markets. PnL (inclusive of rebates/fees) is calculated basis their bonding positions only.
Top bonders from the past 30d within mention markets. PnL (inclusive of rebates/fees) is calculated basis their bonding positions only.
<@&1485393752645173399> Scammer Spotted
<@&1485393752645173399> Scammer Spotted
CPU is either in use or not at any point in time, 20% means it was being utilised 20% of the time over multiple samples of small time periods. you can explore CPU pinning but it depends on how you have broken down sub-tasks within your bot.
CPU is either in use or not at any point in time, 20% means it was being utilised 20% of the time over multiple samples of small time periods. you can explore CPU pinning but it depends on how you have broken down sub-tasks within your bot.
-$823K in taker fees and +$64K in maker rebates, so a mix of both
-$823K in taker fees and +$64K in maker rebates, so a mix of both
these are the top accounts sorted by referral rewards in the past 30D, one of these should be a bonereaper alt
these are the top accounts sorted by referral rewards in the past 30D, one of these should be a bonereaper alt
Bonereaper pays like $10-20k in daily fees, the referral bonus would have been much higher
Bonereaper pays like $10-20k in daily fees, the referral bonus would have been much higher
within those that are bonding crypto up/down at 99c, the ones with higher maker % show healthier 7D overall PnL trend vs those taking (impatient ones). stats above are from all trader's positions in the crypto up/down markets in the past 7D.
within those that are bonding crypto up/down at 99c, the ones with higher maker % show healthier 7D overall PnL trend vs those taking (impatient ones). stats above are from all trader's positions in the crypto up/down markets in the past 7D.
See the fees paid at a day level, it's massive!
See the fees paid at a day level, it's massive!
~300k if you account for fees and rebates
~300k if you account for fees and rebates
will spin an endpoint once they fix tiers as they really should be. atm, random accounts have obsidian while they should have none!
will spin an endpoint once they fix tiers as they really should be. atm, random accounts have obsidian while they should have none!
add live counter of unpaid taker rebates powered by Gravia <:pepelaugh:1492241139820924989>
add live counter of unpaid taker rebates powered by Gravia <:pepelaugh:1492241139820924989>
this totally cracked me up lmao
this totally cracked me up lmao
Here's the 30-day referral leaderboard. Referral rewards is a sep column; total PnL is trading PnL - taker fees + maker rebates (doesn't include referrals).
Here's the 30-day referral leaderboard. Referral rewards is a sep column; total PnL is trading PnL - taker fees + maker rebates (doesn't include referrals).
They seem to be under-counting fees. We are looking at on-chain data, they could be calculating from positions/orders on Poly's API which has trades missing.
They seem to be under-counting fees. We are looking at on-chain data, they could be calculating from positions/orders on Poly's API which has trades missing.
Could probably be self-referring, the referrals leaderboard is pretty interesting
Could probably be self-referring, the referrals leaderboard is pretty interesting
Yes, here's the intra-day split for bonereaper today
Yes, here's the intra-day split for bonereaper today
Bug on Poly's end, chainlink works just fine
Bug on Poly's end, chainlink works just fine
Not in the list, is in net loss today
Not in the list, is in net loss today
Today's Crypto Up/Down Market Leaderboard #1, #3 and #7 seem sus - could be manipulators
Today's Crypto Up/Down Market Leaderboard #1, #3 and #7 seem sus - could be manipulators
a good start would be analysing their strategies; the top wallet entered at 3.8c and won, but has been red past 2d, so it's more luck than strategy. but the ones with more consistent graphs are worth deep diving into.
a good start would be analysing their strategies; the top wallet entered at 3.8c and won, but has been red past 2d, so it's more luck than strategy. but the ones with more consistent graphs are worth deep diving into.
for sure! this is how it will look for everyone who signs up with your keys
for sure! this is how it will look for everyone who signs up with your keys
let me create a keygen for you, like the ones we had back for MS office, Windows :p
let me create a keygen for you, like the ones we had back for MS office, Windows :p
<:pepeking:1492241339243298858> you're the best!
<:pepeking:1492241339243298858> you're the best!
Leaderboard for the last 10 BTC 5-min markets. Doesn't include maker rebates (because it's with a 1-day delay atm).
Leaderboard for the last 10 BTC 5-min markets. Doesn't include maker rebates (because it's with a 1-day delay atm).
yes, can pull this up for you
yes, can pull this up for you
we checked recently, no taker rebates were credited. actively monitoring to start tracking them in PnL. atm, we track everything: LP/Yield/Referrals/Maker Rebates/Taker Fees
we checked recently, no taker rebates were credited. actively monitoring to start tracking them in PnL. atm, we track everything: LP/Yield/Referrals/Maker Rebates/Taker Fees
on top of it, this account barely has any volume for an obsidian tier, even when considering lifetime!
on top of it, this account barely has any volume for an obsidian tier, even when considering lifetime!
it is basis on-chain trades and in line with Poly's documentation. happy to share a dump of his trades if needed.
it is basis on-chain trades and in line with Poly's documentation. happy to share a dump of his trades if needed.
seeing discrepancies for several accounts and our calculations are based on exhaustive on-chain data
seeing discrepancies for several accounts and our calculations are based on exhaustive on-chain data
have asked their devrel team on why is that the case, will let you know when we have an update
have asked their devrel team on why is that the case, will let you know when we have an update
Not sure, but basis Poly's guidelines, the 30-day WV should be $430k. Might be something off with their calculation or them upgrading tiers for specific individuals (unlikely tho!).
Not sure, but basis Poly's guidelines, the 30-day WV should be $430k. Might be something off with their calculation or them upgrading tiers for specific individuals (unlikely tho!).
This should actually be a Gold Tier
This should actually be a Gold Tier
yes, it's the actual dollars traded and not nominal volume. we find nominal to be a little misleading and less utiliarian.
yes, it's the actual dollars traded and not nominal volume. we find nominal to be a little misleading and less utiliarian.
Ah, that could be it. it tags human vs bot at an account/user level. though it's broken, improving the model now
Ah, that could be it. it tags human vs bot at an account/user level. though it's broken, improving the model now