Polymarketif you surem propose Y bruv
if you surem propose Y bruv
RPG参与话题 6消息总数 192
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 192 条，显示第 51-100 条its not
its not
How is this even possible to have this many positions at the same time, and have such good entries on all of them
How is this even possible to have this many positions at the same time, and have such good entries on all of them
Guys do u know who is this ultralisk guy? Wtf, is he a bot, is he a man?
Guys do u know who is this ultralisk guy? Wtf, is he a bot, is he a man?
Guys weekly Trump isnt here? wtf
Guys weekly Trump isnt here? wtf
check the UMA channel; there plenty
check the UMA channel; there plenty
It's very direct and follows strict logic tho clarification can favor N or Y
It's very direct and follows strict logic tho clarification can favor N or Y
it's politics its always better to keep your face when agreeing to something US didnot agreed literally to withdraw their forces, but it resolved Y yesterday because of the inference here is the same thing
it's politics its always better to keep your face when agreeing to something US didnot agreed literally to withdraw their forces, but it resolved Y yesterday because of the inference here is the same thing
OK there is another Iranian guy: Meysam Zohourian, an Iranian lawmaker and secretary of parliament’s Economic Committee (When speaking on Section 9 of the draft MOU) "Freezing Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for the United States not increasing sanctions during the negotiation period." The wording of Section 9 of the final MOU was later changed to the "status quo" langauge. all other reporting is out of context too? JD Vance spoke out of context?
OK there is another Iranian guy: Meysam Zohourian, an Iranian lawmaker and secretary of parliament’s Economic Committee (When speaking on Section 9 of the draft MOU) "Freezing Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for the United States not increasing sanctions during the negotiation period." The wording of Section 9 of the final MOU was later changed to the "status quo" langauge. all other reporting is out of context too? JD Vance spoke out of context?
The primary resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting Every media outlet told us that after MOU Iran stopped enriching Uranium JD Vance told us that iran aggreed to stop enriching Uranium Iranian MP Mahmoud Nabavian told us that they agreed to stop enriching Uranium like wtf yes we dont have a complete, humiliating, declaration of the Iran Ayatollah on his knees; who cares consensus of credible reporting is: Iran agreed to stop enriching Uranium that is all that matters
The primary resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting Every media outlet told us that after MOU Iran stopped enriching Uranium JD Vance told us that iran aggreed to stop enriching Uranium Iranian MP Mahmoud Nabavian told us that they agreed to stop enriching Uranium like wtf yes we dont have a complete, humiliating, declaration of the Iran Ayatollah on his knees; who cares consensus of credible reporting is: Iran agreed to stop enriching Uranium that is all that matters
doesnt matter really
doesnt matter really
ScottyNoo is my enrichment quant in 50p we trust 🙏 🙏 🙏
ScottyNoo is my enrichment quant in 50p we trust 🙏 🙏 🙏
<@1372793119946440746><@342676696853512192>guys stop the talking, get to the doing, i need fills at 40c Y
<@1372793119946440746><@342676696853512192>guys stop the talking, get to the doing, i need fills at 40c Y
COPIUM INJECTED
COPIUM INJECTED
its always those armenian guys
its always those armenian guys
Q: How is your relationship with Netanyahu? Trump: It's good, but we have to keep him a little bit... sane.
Q: How is your relationship with Netanyahu? Trump: It's good, but we have to keep him a little bit... sane.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Iran publicly agrees to end all enrichment of uranium by June 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Iran publicly agrees to end all enrichment of uranium by June 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
but, like its not Iran public official saying this, its JD Vance USA Vice president
but, like its not Iran public official saying this, its JD Vance USA Vice president
is MOU somehow falling under the rules or w
is MOU somehow falling under the rules or w
guys, does someone know why is every sharp on Y here? Except Ae and Amalek
guys, does someone know why is every sharp on Y here? Except Ae and Amalek
the agreement itself is definitive, but its dependent on a condition like the every rent contract is definitive, but is conditional on the fact that the person will pay rent at the end of the month
the agreement itself is definitive, but its dependent on a condition like the every rent contract is definitive, but is conditional on the fact that the person will pay rent at the end of the month
if they resolve to N, like therefore any conditional agreement isnt definitive?? isnot how it works in reality tf, is this precedent will be like
if they resolve to N, like therefore any conditional agreement isnt definitive?? isnot how it works in reality tf, is this precedent will be like
not the clauses, the agreement as a whole
not the clauses, the agreement as a whole
agreement cannot be definitive if it has conditions?
agreement cannot be definitive if it has conditions?
Ae and Dropper are just trolling
Ae and Dropper are just trolling
seems like it
seems like it
its like a clear Y
its like a clear Y
explain your pov
explain your pov
peace
peace
they have committed to signing a final deal (clause 3) they have committed to withdrawing troops once the final deal is signed (clause 4) therefore they have agreed to withdraw troops
they have committed to signing a final deal (clause 3) they have committed to withdrawing troops once the final deal is signed (clause 4) therefore they have agreed to withdraw troops
there is no difference between committing immediately, or commiting conditional on some event; it still a commitement Us commited to withdraw after the deal is finalised; its in the signed agreement
there is no difference between committing immediately, or commiting conditional on some event; it still a commitement Us commited to withdraw after the deal is finalised; its in the signed agreement
Who tagged me, wtf
Who tagged me, wtf
Dude what's your take on troops?
Dude what's your take on troops?
The real question in troops: it's whether conditional agreements count as definitive or nah And we don't have a response to this question, Y side think yes N side think no We need a clarif IMHO
The real question in troops: it's whether conditional agreements count as definitive or nah And we don't have a response to this question, Y side think yes N side think no We need a clarif IMHO
Btw Anoin123 is the top N holder on troops....
Btw Anoin123 is the top N holder on troops....
This one was a clear Y
This one was a clear Y
Tenebrus is my troops quant, im just gonna tail him
Tenebrus is my troops quant, im just gonna tail him
So what about Troop withdrawal? is this a yes?
So what about Troop withdrawal? is this a yes?
bruv, when u made 70k? ur nickname always showed -250k
bruv, when u made 70k? ur nickname always showed -250k
respect
respect
bro you're really such a legend?
bro you're really such a legend?
HE IS THE ULTIMATE AIRSPACE QUANT
HE IS THE ULTIMATE AIRSPACE QUANT
Y AIRSPACE is pumping, DUDE WAS RIGHT
Y AIRSPACE is pumping, DUDE WAS RIGHT
it's ok, i doesn't change anything if the text is right
it's ok, i doesn't change anything if the text is right
ok
ok
how do u know?
how do u know?
Dude is moving markets with single message, that's a quant
Dude is moving markets with single message, that's a quant
<@1316119009648971916> you're the airspace sharp, what are we doing heere
<@1316119009648971916> you're the airspace sharp, what are we doing heere
good point, consensus of credible reporting wasn't reached
good point, consensus of credible reporting wasn't reached
i mean
i mean