Polymarketi think the rules covers just the case we have in doha
i think the rules covers just the case we have in doha
pi参与话题 14消息总数 986
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 986 条，显示第 501-550 条argument is three parties were in doha and held talks through qataris, which is covered in rules by "Meetings conducted indirectly, for example, through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify." + "(including indirect in-person meetings)"
argument is three parties were in doha and held talks through qataris, which is covered in rules by "Meetings conducted indirectly, for example, through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify." + "(including indirect in-person meetings)"
it's for sure worth dispute more than todays madness around op freedom
it's for sure worth dispute more than todays madness around op freedom
https://www.axios.com/2026/06/10/trump-strikes-iran-wait-response-nuclear-deal here is main article
https://www.axios.com/2026/06/10/trump-strikes-iran-wait-response-nuclear-deal here is main article
"Meetings conducted indirectly, for example, through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify." + " (including indirect in-person meetings)"
"Meetings conducted indirectly, for example, through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify." + " (including indirect in-person meetings)"
in reality rules cover just this case imo
in reality rules cover just this case imo
yes axios says parallel
yes axios says parallel
whitehawk
whitehawk
all three parties were in doha
all three parties were in doha
they were there but refused to meet trilateral
they were there but refused to meet trilateral
>The Qataris tried to arrange a trilateral meeting to directly negotiate on the remaining gaps
>The Qataris tried to arrange a trilateral meeting to directly negotiate on the remaining gaps
axios
axios
i can get the argument that it's to stretched to be qualified, but i can't get the argument that if all three parties in doha and using qataris as mediator to deliver messages is not indirect in person meeting, sorry
i can get the argument that it's to stretched to be qualified, but i can't get the argument that if all three parties in doha and using qataris as mediator to deliver messages is not indirect in person meeting, sorry
If you and gum in doha, and i am going from you to gum and back and talking in person and delivering messages its exactly indirect in person meeting
If you and gum in doha, and i am going from you to gum and back and talking in person and delivering messages its exactly indirect in person meeting
Axios
Axios
It is indirect in person meeting
It is indirect in person meeting
Bot iranians and US officials where there, and talked using qataris as mediator
Bot iranians and US officials where there, and talked using qataris as mediator
What they did in doha is in direct inperson meeting
What they did in doha is in direct inperson meeting
Trilateral meeting is in trilateral in person meeting
Trilateral meeting is in trilateral in person meeting
Based on?
Based on?
Bro, you said in same building, thonker said atleast one country or city, "They also according to axios held parallel talks in Doha "Iranian and U.S. officials held parallel talks with Qatari mediators in Doha over the past two days"
Bro, you said in same building, thonker said atleast one country or city, "They also according to axios held parallel talks in Doha "Iranian and U.S. officials held parallel talks with Qatari mediators in Doha over the past two days"
But it allows "Meetings conducted indirectly, for example, through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify." and " (including indirect in-person meetings)" thats the shuttle diplomacy, US authorized qatari to make diplomacy for them and qatari traveled to tehran where met iranians in person. They also according to axios held parallel talks in Doha "Iranian and U.S. officials held parallel talks with Qatari mediators in Doha over the past two days"
But it allows "Meetings conducted indirectly, for example, through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify." and " (including indirect in-person meetings)" thats the shuttle diplomacy, US authorized qatari to make diplomacy for them and qatari traveled to tehran where met iranians in person. They also according to axios held parallel talks in Doha "Iranian and U.S. officials held parallel talks with Qatari mediators in Doha over the past two days"
Why lol
Why lol
And in this case too
And in this case too
It's how it made in most cases
It's how it made in most cases
Shuttle diplomacy can be made by mediator traveling between countries
Shuttle diplomacy can be made by mediator traveling between countries
I don't even know why you guys think it should be in same building
I don't even know why you guys think it should be in same building
In person means they meet in person not just stay in one town
In person means they meet in person not just stay in one town
Mediators serve the purpose of indirect diplomacy
Mediators serve the purpose of indirect diplomacy
But mediators are allowed, wdym
But mediators are allowed, wdym
They were mediator of US
They were mediator of US
The meeting must be in-person (including indirect in-person meetings) Doesnt it qualify since qatari was authorised by us and met in person with iranians?
The meeting must be in-person (including indirect in-person meetings) Doesnt it qualify since qatari was authorised by us and met in person with iranians?
idk honestly seems like it qualifies this "Meetings conducted indirectly, for example, through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify." by borderline
idk honestly seems like it qualifies this "Meetings conducted indirectly, for example, through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify." by borderline
reuters says qatari negotiators traveled to tehran after consultations with the us to finalize an agreement
reuters says qatari negotiators traveled to tehran after consultations with the us to finalize an agreement
i don't think that mediator which is trying to arrange meeting should cound for actual diplomatic meeting
i don't think that mediator which is trying to arrange meeting should cound for actual diplomatic meeting
iran refused, no further talks on any questions
iran refused, no further talks on any questions
qataris was trying to arrange meeting that's all
qataris was trying to arrange meeting that's all
i already traded y from 60 and out on the top
i already traded y from 60 and out on the top
if this point would not be there it could be argued, but it's there
if this point would not be there it could be argued, but it's there
impression doesnt change the resolution rules
impression doesnt change the resolution rules
it's not even needed to be restarted
it's not even needed to be restarted
"** any announcement **of a substantially equivalent United States military program to escort, protect, or retrieve commercial ships in or through the Strait of Hormuz will qualify"
"** any announcement **of a substantially equivalent United States military program to escort, protect, or retrieve commercial ships in or through the Strait of Hormuz will qualify"
civil war above hormuz
civil war above hormuz
def looks like something american
def looks like something american
why is he shooting down american plane
why is he shooting down american plane
"**any announcement** of a substantially equivalent United States military program to escort, protect, or retrieve commercial ships in or through the Strait of Hormuz will qualify"
"**any announcement** of a substantially equivalent United States military program to escort, protect, or retrieve commercial ships in or through the Strait of Hormuz will qualify"
lets make a gentleman agreement to not argue this for 3 hours more after clarif please
lets make a gentleman agreement to not argue this for 3 hours more after clarif please
no point to argue even
no point to argue even
there is no hidden ace or ambiguity, nothing can really influence incoming clarification
there is no hidden ace or ambiguity, nothing can really influence incoming clarification
They don’t count secret ships they have transponders off
They don’t count secret ships they have transponders off