PolymarketContext matters, trump mocked vance with “little boy” in may, but context was not negative
Context matters, trump mocked vance with “little boy” in may, but context was not negative
pi参与话题 14消息总数 990
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 990 条，显示第 951-990 条why if it went back? i don't get your point
why if it went back? i don't get your point
bro, they sold it yes, i'm saying that the 411 BTC Coinbase Prime transfer cant be used as on-chain evidence of a proof of a sale because it round tripped back(411 went out and 411 went back), and did not match or connected in any way with the later 32 BTC sale size, reported on June 1 after expiration of the May 31 bracket.
bro, they sold it yes, i'm saying that the 411 BTC Coinbase Prime transfer cant be used as on-chain evidence of a proof of a sale because it round tripped back(411 went out and 411 went back), and did not match or connected in any way with the later 32 BTC sale size, reported on June 1 after expiration of the May 31 bracket.
what's the evidence of sell anyway from onchain
what's the evidence of sell anyway from onchain
I don't see the problem still, it was round-tripped
I don't see the problem still, it was round-tripped
It was not, funds moving is usual stuff, for example month ago
It was not, funds moving is usual stuff, for example month ago
Let's count 411 went out, 411 went back. How it can be used to extend the market?
Let's count 411 went out, 411 went back. How it can be used to extend the market?
Why if it is round-tripped(aka not connected to sell), and they do it all the time?
Why if it is round-tripped(aka not connected to sell), and they do it all the time?
411 BTC Coinbase Prime transfer cant be used as on-chain evidence of a proof of a sale because it round tripped back, and did not match or connected in any way with the later 32 BTC sale size, reported on June 1 after expiration of the May 31 bracket.
411 BTC Coinbase Prime transfer cant be used as on-chain evidence of a proof of a sale because it round tripped back, and did not match or connected in any way with the later 32 BTC sale size, reported on June 1 after expiration of the May 31 bracket.
there is none
there is none
i honestly don't see the difference in resolving musk based on his presence in the list called "brilliant" with people in "losers" car
i honestly don't see the difference in resolving musk based on his presence in the list called "brilliant" with people in "losers" car
also, we've been resolving group praising for individuals in the group with same rules, why suddenly group insult is not counts
also, we've been resolving group praising for individuals in the group with same rules, why suddenly group insult is not counts
we've been resolving markets with less
we've been resolving markets with less
cmon this time we even have media consensus
cmon this time we even have media consensus
Isn’t he posted this pic today
Isn’t he posted this pic today
<:pepecry:1480174599093096560>
<:pepecry:1480174599093096560>
https://discord.com/channels/710897173927297116/817444472009785366/1510702611362218077 lets scam these then
https://discord.com/channels/710897173927297116/817444472009785366/1510702611362218077 lets scam these then
Tucker duznt cunt he’s in the back seat of the car
Tucker duznt cunt he’s in the back seat of the car
Considering tensions about his policies might play out, anonymous source though
Considering tensions about his policies might play out, anonymous source though
Either with email or sign with wallet
Either with email or sign with wallet
You need to authorize on fake poly US website
You need to authorize on fake poly US website
It’s 31 do we have new scams at the end of month
It’s 31 do we have new scams at the end of month
Anything which is not related to Cuba-US diplomacy in general
Anything which is not related to Cuba-US diplomacy in general
Summit with both sides present and brief greetings, maybe talks about peace on Middle East in between, even if highly ranked politicians present
Summit with both sides present and brief greetings, maybe talks about peace on Middle East in between, even if highly ranked politicians present
Can’t be defeated now
Can’t be defeated now
Ask him is fence discussion can have high diplomatic importance
Ask him is fence discussion can have high diplomatic importance
read his nickname
read his nickname
thonker doesnt count
thonker doesnt count
feels dirty, yeah
feels dirty, yeah
then sell when preclarif announced and say "i'll stay on sidelines"
then sell when preclarif announced and say "i'll stay on sidelines"
<:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251>
<:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251>
"Those involved in the little-known line of diplomacy" "Buehn was tasked with carrying out a small slice of diplomacy between two nations" "are a small oasis of amity and diplomacy in the otherwise perennially contested territory"
"Those involved in the little-known line of diplomacy" "Buehn was tasked with carrying out a small slice of diplomacy between two nations" "are a small oasis of amity and diplomacy in the otherwise perennially contested territory"
They were suspended in Jan 2025. This meeting first since 2025 when Trump suspended such meetings, first ever including top ranking officers from both sides, happened under high pressure between countries, acknowledged as politically important by both sides and media, meeting which main result was "agreed to communicate further" after a long period of silence.
They were suspended in Jan 2025. This meeting first since 2025 when Trump suspended such meetings, first ever including top ranking officers from both sides, happened under high pressure between countries, acknowledged as politically important by both sides and media, meeting which main result was "agreed to communicate further" after a long period of silence.
There was brief clause, which absurd, then it was "its purely operational look at southcom statement" which i addressed https://discord.com/channels/710897173927297116/817444472009785366/1510295710774460536 here, now i think it will be "military diplomacy does not count"
There was brief clause, which absurd, then it was "its purely operational look at southcom statement" which i addressed https://discord.com/channels/710897173927297116/817444472009785366/1510295710774460536 here, now i think it will be "military diplomacy does not count"
Southcom statement: https://x.com/Southcom/status/2060477815644983791 Which is refers to the event ALSO happened on this day BESIDES meeting with cubans as reported by everyone(AP on the screenshot) Bruh just admit it you didnt do proper research
Southcom statement: https://x.com/Southcom/status/2060477815644983791 Which is refers to the event ALSO happened on this day BESIDES meeting with cubans as reported by everyone(AP on the screenshot) Bruh just admit it you didnt do proper research
P2
P2
Yeah, they meet and then general went to acess US security yada yada
Yeah, they meet and then general went to acess US security yada yada
bruh stahp
bruh stahp
Cause you just havent read article
Cause you just havent read article
It's still diplomatic. It all happened cause of current escalation of diplomatic relationship with Cuba, can't be interpret as anything, but diplomatic. First since 2025 when Trump suspended such meetings, first ever including top ranking officers from both sides, happened under high pressure between countries, acknowledged as politically important by both sides and media, meeting which main result was "agreed to communicate further" after a long period of silence. Reuters(US general meets Cuban military officials at edge of Guantanamo Bay** as Trump pressures island nation**): > "The head of the U.S. military's Southern Command met with top Cuban military officials Friday at the edge of the American naval base at Guantanamo Bay, as President Trump heaps pressure on Cuba and does not rule out military action. " Meeting was "rare" happened by "mutual agreement" and both sides "agreed to maintain communication" AP(US commander meets with Cuban military officials **as Trump pressures island nation**): > "The top U.S. commander in Latin America met with Cuban military leaders Friday in a “brief exchange on operational security matters” near the U.S. Navy base in Guantanamo Bay, the latest official to visit the island nation **as President Donald Trump ramps up pressure on its leaders.** > > Gen. Francis Donovan, head of U.S. Southern Command, met with Lt. Gen. Roberto Legrá Sotolongo and other Cuban military officials." It was the "latest official" US visit and that the sides agreed to communicate between military commands. CBS(Top U.S. general in Caribbean meets with Cuban military leaders near Guantanamo Bay** as tensions simmer**): > "In recent months, the **Trump administration has put intense pressure on Cuba**, which has frustrated U.S. presidents for decades. > > Gen. Francis Donovan, head of U.S. Southern Command, met with Lt. Gen. Roberto Legrá Sotolongo and other Cuban military officials. > > Cuba’s Revolutionary Armed Forces said in a statement that both sides viewed “**the meeting positively because it addressed security issues along the perimeter separating the military enclave, and they agreed to maintain communication between the two military commands**." Latest high level contact between the United States and Cuba. Under rules provided this meeting should qualify.
It's still diplomatic. It all happened cause of current escalation of diplomatic relationship with Cuba, can't be interpret as anything, but diplomatic. First since 2025 when Trump suspended such meetings, first ever including top ranking officers from both sides, happened under high pressure between countries, acknowledged as politically important by both sides and media, meeting which main result was "agreed to communicate further" after a long period of silence. Reuters(US general meets Cuban military officials at edge of Guantanamo Bay** as Trump pressures island nation**): > "The head of the U.S. military's Southern Command met with top Cuban military officials Friday at the edge of the American naval base at Guantanamo Bay, as President Trump heaps pressure on Cuba and does not rule out military action. " Meeting was "rare" happened by "mutual agreement" and both sides "agreed to maintain communication" AP(US commander meets with Cuban military officials **as Trump pressures island nation**): > "The top U.S. commander in Latin America met with Cuban military leaders Friday in a “brief exchange on operational security matters” near the U.S. Navy base in Guantanamo Bay, the latest official to visit the island nation **as President Donald Trump ramps up pressure on its leaders.** > > Gen. Francis Donovan, head of U.S. Southern Command, met with Lt. Gen. Roberto Legrá Sotolongo and other Cuban military officials." It was the "latest official" US visit and that the sides agreed to communicate between military commands. CBS(Top U.S. general in Caribbean meets with Cuban military leaders near Guantanamo Bay** as tensions simmer**): > "In recent months, the **Trump administration has put intense pressure on Cuba**, which has frustrated U.S. presidents for decades. > > Gen. Francis Donovan, head of U.S. Southern Command, met with Lt. Gen. Roberto Legrá Sotolongo and other Cuban military officials. > > Cuba’s Revolutionary Armed Forces said in a statement that both sides viewed “**the meeting positively because it addressed security issues along the perimeter separating the military enclave, and they agreed to maintain communication between the two military commands**." Latest high level contact between the United States and Cuba. Under rules provided this meeting should qualify.
← 上一页
第 20 / 20 页