聊天记录
共 986 条,显示第 351-400 条
announcement should be "A qualifying announcement requires **clear public confirmation** from the U.S." not something which you reconstruct from 4 different Trump posts, 3 interviews and 10 news articles in some frankenstein which should qualify
announcement should be "A qualifying announcement requires **clear public confirmation** from the U.S." not something which you reconstruct from 4 different Trump posts, 3 interviews and 10 news articles in some frankenstein which should qualify
not ceasefire or hormuz open but ceasefire and hormuz open yadayada
not ceasefire or hormuz open but ceasefire and hormuz open yadayada
- An announcement that the US and Iran have agreed to a new temporary framework under which the ceasefire would continue as Iran gradually reopens the Strait of Hormuz and the United States begins to unfreeze Iranian assets would qualify.
- An announcement that the US and Iran have agreed to a new temporary framework under which the ceasefire would continue as Iran gradually reopens the Strait of Hormuz and the United States begins to unfreeze Iranian assets would qualify.
Yeah and nothing about ceasefire
Yeah and nothing about ceasefire
No details from US - means only "reportedly includes"
No details from US - means only "reportedly includes"
vro i am 100% sure that agreement includes everything whats needed for resolution of the market, it has not been announced by US though
vro i am 100% sure that agreement includes everything whats needed for resolution of the market, it has not been announced by US though
Ofc not, but i havent seen clear announcement that fighting stops from the US govmnt too
Ofc not, but i havent seen clear announcement that fighting stops from the US govmnt too
I'm mentioning peace only cause peace will do the work for ceasefire too
I'm mentioning peace only cause peace will do the work for ceasefire too
It's all reported by third party or Iran
It's all reported by third party or Iran
There is no place of my knowing where US officially aknowledges details of this agreement which includes ceasefire or peace or whatever
There is no place of my knowing where US officially aknowledges details of this agreement which includes ceasefire or peace or whatever
Where? If we have that we can resolve to y
Where? If we have that we can resolve to y
The problem is that announcement of ceasefire has been extended or military activities is halted has not been made. Rules are cucky:
A qualifying announcement requires clear public confirmation from the U.S. government that the U.S. has either:
1. *Extended*.....
2. *Renewed *.....
Rules want the announcement which will announce ceasefire/halt of military, not an announcement that ceasefire will be reached after signing which is scheduled for tomorrow, without even officially providing details on that, which only known reportedly and by third sources or Iran, which is not resolution source.
It is not enough to resolve it by credible media rule also - "An overwhelming consensus of credible reporting that a qualifying extension or successor **agreement has been definitively established** will also suffice for a “Yes” resolution." it's just doesnt meet most of the rules requirements
The problem is that announcement of ceasefire has been extended or military activities is halted has not been made. Rules are cucky:
A qualifying announcement requires clear public confirmation from the U.S. government that the U.S. has either:
1. *Extended*.....
2. *Renewed *.....
Rules want the announcement which will announce ceasefire/halt of military, not an announcement that ceasefire will be reached after signing which is scheduled for tomorrow, without even officially providing details on that, which only known reportedly and by third sources or Iran, which is not resolution source.
It is not enough to resolve it by credible media rule also - "An overwhelming consensus of credible reporting that a qualifying extension or successor **agreement has been definitively established** will also suffice for a “Yes” resolution." it's just doesnt meet most of the rules requirements
We have from different sources(Axios, Iranian FM, CBS etc), also from fox news
We have from different sources(Axios, Iranian FM, CBS etc), also from fox news
i mean, a lot of news came out after initial scam attempt, iranians agreed etc
i mean, a lot of news came out after initial scam attempt, iranians agreed etc
its double disputed already
its double disputed already
to be honest a lot of news came out
to be honest a lot of news came out
its 0.7
its 0.7
join the darkside
join the darkside
ceasefire 12 june
ceasefire 12 june
I'll prepare my fully convincing argument soon
I'll prepare my fully convincing argument soon
I'll join the dark side this time
I'll join the dark side this time
i thought your main lesson is to follow your initial standing
i thought your main lesson is to follow your initial standing
never in any universe this would be clarified as y
never in any universe this would be clarified as y
if it would be decent volume market this Y scam would not get through
if it would be decent volume market this Y scam would not get through
it just has been proposed and not disputed cause 5,5 gamblers trade it with significant size
it just has been proposed and not disputed cause 5,5 gamblers trade it with significant size
not only, this term is heavily used in law language in US
not only, this term is heavily used in law language in US
also assprint
also assprint
thonker is trump no insult expert
thonker is trump no insult expert
Interesting since bibi denied Israel is part of mou
Interesting since bibi denied Israel is part of mou
Can't go in details about it from phone atm, but in US history it's a chain of "mistakes", but in reality they were arming radicals through pakistani, carter was in direct contact whith khamenei and basically orcestrated islamic revolution. There only theories on this why he did it, like creating anti-soviet radical religious buffer in middle east since he was afraid communists can came to power and other ones
Can't go in details about it from phone atm, but in US history it's a chain of "mistakes", but in reality they were arming radicals through pakistani, carter was in direct contact whith khamenei and basically orcestrated islamic revolution. There only theories on this why he did it, like creating anti-soviet radical religious buffer in middle east since he was afraid communists can came to power and other ones
Of radicals
Of radicals
Also USA was directly supporting op groups
Also USA was directly supporting op groups
As always
As always
Carter pressed Iran to "not opress islamic opposition"
Carter pressed Iran to "not opress islamic opposition"
Not trump directly, but in the end it's USA who fucked up Iran's future by supporting retarded islamic revolution
Not trump directly, but in the end it's USA who fucked up Iran's future by supporting retarded islamic revolution
which guy
which guy
wdym
wdym
bibi said it's not
bibi said it's not
it's like a PR worker
it's like a PR worker
its representive in UN lol
its representive in UN lol
they 100% don't need iranian uranium
they 100% don't need iranian uranium
there is very little of enriched uranium in iran compared to any nuclear country, like 0.1-0.05% from USA or Russia stock
there is very little of enriched uranium in iran compared to any nuclear country, like 0.1-0.05% from USA or Russia stock
iran doesnt want their uranium, they want them to not posess weapon-grade uranium
iran doesnt want their uranium, they want them to not posess weapon-grade uranium
its the same as surrender enriched uranium but with more work
its the same as surrender enriched uranium but with more work
why they would do it
why they would do it
i would not argue on that, they did not said they met separately, it was bad hebrew-english translation of the x post
i would not argue on that, they did not said they met separately, it was bad hebrew-english translation of the x post
if we would resolve by axios articles diplomatic meeting would have been resolved already cause they reported on meeting mediated by qataris in doha
if we would resolve by axios articles diplomatic meeting would have been resolved already cause they reported on meeting mediated by qataris in doha
all the details stated in axios article is not confirmed by US
all the details stated in axios article is not confirmed by US
stahp
stahp
bruh
bruh