PolymarketI guess I didn't wanna fade CNN especially with the later article where they cited 3 sources
I guess I didn't wanna fade CNN especially with the later article where they cited 3 sources
Thonker参与话题 26消息总数 1397
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 1397 条，显示第 401-450 条It was very surprising to me but this whole conflict has been full of surprises
It was very surprising to me but this whole conflict has been full of surprises
There's more info now beyond the US/Iran denials denizz was right and I was wrong <:Salute:1306491774537302138>
There's more info now beyond the US/Iran denials denizz was right and I was wrong <:Salute:1306491774537302138>
apparently so
apparently so
CNN just posted some fake news too about the MoU saying it was the electronically signed version, but apparently it was actually an old draft from May 💀
CNN just posted some fake news too about the MoU saying it was the electronically signed version, but apparently it was actually an old draft from May 💀
Isn't it already being revealed
Isn't it already being revealed
Interesting, so conflicting reports huh
Interesting, so conflicting reports huh
They should both go the same way tbh Iranian denial came after the deadline and CNN had snippets of it in a seperate article that matches Bloomberg The rules say "any portion" qualifies I detailed it more in my UMA post
They should both go the same way tbh Iranian denial came after the deadline and CNN had snippets of it in a seperate article that matches Bloomberg The rules say "any portion" qualifies I detailed it more in my UMA post
I think a consensus of credible reporting should overturn govt propaganda <:Shrug:1306491719201849364>
I think a consensus of credible reporting should overturn govt propaganda <:Shrug:1306491719201849364>
they're lying <:chad:1306492281976782919>
they're lying <:chad:1306492281976782919>
https://youtu.be/EMw-j6xCulc Denizz the scammer, ran off with the cash, Set the bait, pulled the rug—gone in a flash!
https://youtu.be/EMw-j6xCulc Denizz the scammer, ran off with the cash, Set the bait, pulled the rug—gone in a flash!
Yeah it's unclear to me if he's even denying that this is the one that was signed on Sunday
Yeah it's unclear to me if he's even denying that this is the one that was signed on Sunday
A credible leak does not cease to be credible because it was denied
A credible leak does not cease to be credible because it was denied
I think they're lying for optics reasons, guess we'll see
I think they're lying for optics reasons, guess we'll see
I genuinely think this was the version digitally signed on Sunday
I genuinely think this was the version digitally signed on Sunday
If more articles come out explicitly saying they are lying I think it should overturn
If more articles come out explicitly saying they are lying I think it should overturn
Call me crazy but idts
Call me crazy but idts
Unironically trust a CNN article citing 3 people over them
Unironically trust a CNN article citing 3 people over them
Cheung and Iran are lying <:chad:1306492281976782919>
Cheung and Iran are lying <:chad:1306492281976782919>
I trust CNN over state propaganda <:chad:1306492281976782919>
I trust CNN over state propaganda <:chad:1306492281976782919>
Cheung said "language of the actual MOU" Isn't he referring to the formal one that will be signed Friday that's still being revised
Cheung said "language of the actual MOU" Isn't he referring to the formal one that will be signed Friday that's still being revised
Iran lies constantly about everything, they claimed Khamenei was going live like 15 times after he was dead
Iran lies constantly about everything, they claimed Khamenei was going live like 15 times after he was dead
When you have multiple western outlets that cited multiple people at the summit saying the opposite, I think they should overrule
When you have multiple western outlets that cited multiple people at the summit saying the opposite, I think they should overrule
It would be horrible to overturn this because of Iranian lies
It would be horrible to overturn this because of Iranian lies
> A diplomat who saw it at the G7 summit in France this week confirmed its contents, as did two other diplomatic sources with knowledge of negotiations. They confirmed with multiple sources
> A diplomat who saw it at the G7 summit in France this week confirmed its contents, as did two other diplomatic sources with knowledge of negotiations. They confirmed with multiple sources
> The 14-point memorandum of understanding has not yet been officially released but a copy of it was obtained by CNN from a US official. A diplomat who saw it at the G7 summit in France this week confirmed its contents, as did two other diplomatic sources with knowledge of negotiations.
> The 14-point memorandum of understanding has not yet been officially released but a copy of it was obtained by CNN from a US official. A diplomat who saw it at the G7 summit in France this week confirmed its contents, as did two other diplomatic sources with knowledge of negotiations.
Does any N holder agree with the reflect thing except analista 💀
Does any N holder agree with the reflect thing except analista 💀
That means that's what the text is
That means that's what the text is
CNN said it's the version they signed
CNN said it's the version they signed
And that it's actively being revised
And that it's actively being revised
BBG is saying it's from G7, where is the contradiction?
BBG is saying it's from G7, where is the contradiction?
There's no conflict if this is a later draft
There's no conflict if this is a later draft
I don't get the argument that we should disregard it because it conflicts with an earlier version
I don't get the argument that we should disregard it because it conflicts with an earlier version
I think it is, they literally say its what's being circulated at G7
I think it is, they literally say its what's being circulated at G7
idgi
idgi
Why should we discount something from the G7 Summit due to a lack of inclusion of a clause from an earlier draft?
Why should we discount something from the G7 Summit due to a lack of inclusion of a clause from an earlier draft?
is this ai 😭
is this ai 😭
He's just making a joke/callback
He's just making a joke/callback
So I guess I'll stay out
So I guess I'll stay out
Not sure any of that stuff should count but the bar is insanely low
Not sure any of that stuff should count but the bar is insanely low
Insult disputed
Insult disputed
They said it's the latest draft that they saw themselves and in a seperate article referenced it when talking to people about the matter
They said it's the latest draft that they saw themselves and in a seperate article referenced it when talking to people about the matter
I remember last night when 50P tried to use House of Saud as a source <:chad:1306492281976782919>
I remember last night when 50P tried to use House of Saud as a source <:chad:1306492281976782919>
I think BBG should be considered more credible than them, maybe it wasn't in the deal to begin with
I think BBG should be considered more credible than them, maybe it wasn't in the deal to begin with
Who says amwaj isn't mistaken?
Who says amwaj isn't mistaken?
Temporally the amwaj/iran one comes first so I disagree that there's a conflict
Temporally the amwaj/iran one comes first so I disagree that there's a conflict
He also said "I watched a senator reed that nobody ever heard of the other day"
He also said "I watched a senator reed that nobody ever heard of the other day"
https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xfd8594f2ce43dae64729da567342c609e9f8d255bee6e80b3c5fa49639f5a37c <@95759375464923136> FYI this is what he's talking about, there was a dispute market he gave me alpha for, I promised him 30%, gave him 30%, which was $16,125, actually a little less but I rounded it a bit, and then he crashed out and wanted 50%
https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xfd8594f2ce43dae64729da567342c609e9f8d255bee6e80b3c5fa49639f5a37c <@95759375464923136> FYI this is what he's talking about, there was a dispute market he gave me alpha for, I promised him 30%, gave him 30%, which was $16,125, actually a little less but I rounded it a bit, and then he crashed out and wanted 50%
False but we can escrow with aenews or someone if you want
False but we can escrow with aenews or someone if you want
These are formal terms for a sidebet between <@95759375464923136> and <@570563844678877196>. If the final, formally, physically signed version of the US-Iran agreement, released by the United States, has a clause that states that it will "ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon,” or any materially equivalent language, <@570563844678877196> will win this sidebet. Otherwise, <@95759375464923136> will win. If the draft merely states that there will be an "immediate and permanent end to the war on all fronts, including Lebanon," that will not alone suffice. A clause ensuring "territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon" is necessary. If <@95759375464923136> wins this bet, he will transfer $960 to <@570563844678877196>. If <@570563844678877196> wins this bet, he will transfer $40 to <@95759375464923136> . If the full text of the deal is released by the United States by EOY 2026 Eastern Time, this sidebet will be cancelled. We can also escrow with someone or have someone resolve a dispute if you want. Do these terms sound good?
These are formal terms for a sidebet between <@95759375464923136> and <@570563844678877196>. If the final, formally, physically signed version of the US-Iran agreement, released by the United States, has a clause that states that it will "ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon,” or any materially equivalent language, <@570563844678877196> will win this sidebet. Otherwise, <@95759375464923136> will win. If the draft merely states that there will be an "immediate and permanent end to the war on all fronts, including Lebanon," that will not alone suffice. A clause ensuring "territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon" is necessary. If <@95759375464923136> wins this bet, he will transfer $960 to <@570563844678877196>. If <@570563844678877196> wins this bet, he will transfer $40 to <@95759375464923136> . If the full text of the deal is released by the United States by EOY 2026 Eastern Time, this sidebet will be cancelled. We can also escrow with someone or have someone resolve a dispute if you want. Do these terms sound good?