Polymarketdid holy moses really do 1$ to 100k$ or just engagement farming larp
did holy moses really do 1$ to 100k$ or just engagement farming larp
Jeffery epstein参与话题 9消息总数 234
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 234 条，显示第 151-200 条<:wow:1480174271589384212>
<:wow:1480174271589384212>
we gonna catch uma 1st
we gonna catch uma 1st
agreed..
agreed..
ahhh i see .. you already bought at 60
ahhh i see .. you already bought at 60
lets all agree to p4 then..
lets all agree to p4 then..
<@1272383282687905939> p4
<@1272383282687905939> p4
<@707597210845446214>
<@707597210845446214>
<@1272383282687905939> can you please fix the <#1179538916504776724> i dont see any new clarifications..
<@1272383282687905939> can you please fix the <#1179538916504776724> i dont see any new clarifications..
too early to judge
too early to judge
alrightt whatever you say
alrightt whatever you say
for enrichment i m on yes
for enrichment i m on yes
stop ridinggg
stop ridinggg
<@1212792946341183578> <@1402074242211643422> can you guys clarify the troops withdrawal market
<@1212792946341183578> <@1402074242211643422> can you guys clarify the troops withdrawal market
<@941405798096076880> what happened
<@941405798096076880> what happened
dumb q : what this cs is
dumb q : what this cs is
its not...
its not...
they will but market is only for june 30 <:wow:1480174271589384212>
they will but market is only for june 30 <:wow:1480174271589384212>
not minee tho
not minee tho
P2 - YES The main NO argument is that because the withdrawal is only required after the final deal, this is not a definitive agreement yet - it's just a framework that might lead to withdrawal later. That misses what the rules actually test for. The rules say the US has agreed if the withdrawal is included as part of a deal that is formally established through signing. In the MOU we have: *"The United States of America further undertakes to remove its forces from the proximity of the Islamic Republic of Iran within 30 days after the final deal."* https://edition.cnn.com/2026/06/17/middleeast/us-iran-war-mou-text-intl "Undertakes" is definitive agreement/consent. The rules __do not__ add any requirement that the commitment must be unconditional, or that the final deal must already be done. They specifically say any definitive commitment made before the deadline counts, regardless of when or whether the action actually begins. If you sign something that says you will do step two after step one is completed, you have still agreed to do step two. The obligation exists in the signed text. It is not a suggestion or a negotiation = it is written as something the US undertakes to do. The fact that it is an interim MOU does not erase the withdrawal clause that sits inside it. The rules care about what is included in the signed deal, not whether every part happens immediately.
P2 - YES The main NO argument is that because the withdrawal is only required after the final deal, this is not a definitive agreement yet - it's just a framework that might lead to withdrawal later. That misses what the rules actually test for. The rules say the US has agreed if the withdrawal is included as part of a deal that is formally established through signing. In the MOU we have: *"The United States of America further undertakes to remove its forces from the proximity of the Islamic Republic of Iran within 30 days after the final deal."* https://edition.cnn.com/2026/06/17/middleeast/us-iran-war-mou-text-intl "Undertakes" is definitive agreement/consent. The rules __do not__ add any requirement that the commitment must be unconditional, or that the final deal must already be done. They specifically say any definitive commitment made before the deadline counts, regardless of when or whether the action actually begins. If you sign something that says you will do step two after step one is completed, you have still agreed to do step two. The obligation exists in the signed text. It is not a suggestion or a negotiation = it is written as something the US undertakes to do. The fact that it is an interim MOU does not erase the withdrawal clause that sits inside it. The rules care about what is included in the signed deal, not whether every part happens immediately.
should we buy UE at 0.1 now
should we buy UE at 0.1 now
idt so ... something is wrong...
idt so ... something is wrong...
# REALLY
# REALLY
once bosarum see's this he might block withdrawals for this scam gang
once bosarum see's this he might block withdrawals for this scam gang
yess .. But do you think it will come before june 30?
yess .. But do you think it will come before june 30?
what do you think about the troop market
what do you think about the troop market
but i do think trump just may tweet about it by june 30... somebody might ask him this in the interview .. Thats it , yes will fly like ballistic missiles from iran
but i do think trump just may tweet about it by june 30... somebody might ask him this in the interview .. Thats it , yes will fly like ballistic missiles from iran
its not p2... there is not a single proof from us saying they can have some UE
its not p2... there is not a single proof from us saying they can have some UE
so its clear that it will go to yes
so its clear that it will go to yes
money doesn't move markets .. Rules do ...
money doesn't move markets .. Rules do ...
they were not scam
they were not scam
yeah agreed but just saying .. that he didnt clarify
yeah agreed but just saying .. that he didnt clarify
yesterday bosarum was online in the chat and evryone was begging him to clarify for the iran space ... he did nothing tho
yesterday bosarum was online in the chat and evryone was begging him to clarify for the iran space ... he did nothing tho
they did bro. where have you been?
they did bro. where have you been?
fyi , they stopped givng clari from the last week. A lot were requesting for clari for dipsutes but they left this sht to uma
fyi , they stopped givng clari from the last week. A lot were requesting for clari for dipsutes but they left this sht to uma
Noone is trying to scam here... by rules = yes
Noone is trying to scam here... by rules = yes
that would be enough to resolve the market
that would be enough to resolve the market
there's some % he will allow
there's some % he will allow
maybe in upcoming days we might see a accepted version for enrichment.. i mean he won't permanently ban iran from enrichment..
maybe in upcoming days we might see a accepted version for enrichment.. i mean he won't permanently ban iran from enrichment..
exactlyyy
exactlyyy
buy some yes for him too
buy some yes for him too
strongest no arg
strongest no arg
he has 1500 on yes btw
he has 1500 on yes btw
i m planning to bond june 16 .. is it safe to do bro or you gonna come up with something again 💀
i m planning to bond june 16 .. is it safe to do bro or you gonna come up with something again 💀
https://tenor.com/view/diddy-creepy-pdiddy-puff-daddy-lips-gif-9281932152291345469
https://tenor.com/view/diddy-creepy-pdiddy-puff-daddy-lips-gif-9281932152291345469
little correction : dating a mamacita with a bombaclat
little correction : dating a mamacita with a bombaclat
i mean he can still buy june 16 no at 92 and bond
i mean he can still buy june 16 no at 92 and bond
https://tenor.com/view/james-franco-wait-what-wut-wtf-nani-gif-25479769
https://tenor.com/view/james-franco-wait-what-wut-wtf-nani-gif-25479769
lol you are depending on scotty ?
lol you are depending on scotty ?
yes should be at atleast 50c for text !! why do noobs still buying no?
yes should be at atleast 50c for text !! why do noobs still buying no?