PolymarketEnd of enrichment is dumping lol
End of enrichment is dumping lol
Gum参与话题 33消息总数 2576
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 2576 条，显示第 451-500 条Oh it’s been at 10c for a while
Oh it’s been at 10c for a while
Arman is still buying
Arman is still buying
Price hasn’t moved
Price hasn’t moved
What market are you talking about
What market are you talking about
?
?
nop
nop
like magic everything is slowly going p2
like magic everything is slowly going p2
i see
i see
politico says it has officially qualified
politico says it has officially qualified
how can he do that ?
how can he do that ?
ok why does this not count ?
ok why does this not count ?
why should it ?
why should it ?
<@1319754532393062425>
<@1319754532393062425>
<@396252107490983959>
<@396252107490983959>
<@1212908183723708510>
<@1212908183723708510>
looks like its ggs for the N holders
looks like its ggs for the N holders
paddaa sold 7,874 No for Troop Withdrawal at 18.3¢ ($1,437)
paddaa sold 7,874 No for Troop Withdrawal at 18.3¢ ($1,437)
<@&1485393752645173399> ban him
<@&1485393752645173399> ban him
Yes
Yes
I feel like I can’t get my point across
I feel like I can’t get my point across
Check ur dms
Check ur dms
Dude It’s so hard to explain
Dude It’s so hard to explain
This is a misresolve if it goes p2
This is a misresolve if it goes p2
No it doesn’t, it’s a very valid argument
No it doesn’t, it’s a very valid argument
But that chart has nothing to do with the argument lol
But that chart has nothing to do with the argument lol
No dude this isn’t the argument
No dude this isn’t the argument
Yeah you get it
Yeah you get it
It’s not about that 👍
It’s not about that 👍
Ok we can go over this come dispute time
Ok we can go over this come dispute time
Fv is not 99c
Fv is not 99c
Thonkers argument is good
Thonkers argument is good
But that’s the point
But that’s the point
Well now I agree
Well now I agree
<@886004822669664286> dms
<@886004822669664286> dms
No that’s not what I’m trying to say
No that’s not what I’m trying to say
The signature had to be the deal signing signature
The signature had to be the deal signing signature
Which is I think what was meant to be translated through the ceremony clause, to say that if Trump signed after it had no relevance
Which is I think what was meant to be translated through the ceremony clause, to say that if Trump signed after it had no relevance
For an example, it’s basically as if Trump is just signing a piece of paper, the actual signing of the deal that bears weight is the electronic signature
For an example, it’s basically as if Trump is just signing a piece of paper, the actual signing of the deal that bears weight is the electronic signature
Trumps physical signature on the deal is not the deal signing signature if that makes sense ? Maybe I am phrasing this poorly
Trumps physical signature on the deal is not the deal signing signature if that makes sense ? Maybe I am phrasing this poorly
I see what Thonker was saying
I see what Thonker was saying
It’s a N
It’s a N
Ok I finally understand thonkers argument
Ok I finally understand thonkers argument
Trump signed the deal physically as well as electronically, Iranians only signed it electronically
Trump signed the deal physically as well as electronically, Iranians only signed it electronically
Wut
Wut
Pretty sure the Iranians only signed it electronically
Pretty sure the Iranians only signed it electronically
He signed it physically
He signed it physically
But the Trump market is a clear p2
But the Trump market is a clear p2
Deal physically signed is obvious p4 now
Deal physically signed is obvious p4 now
🤦
🤦