Polymarketthere's no need
there's no need
nele_next_level参与话题 6消息总数 280
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 280 条，显示第 201-250 条oh man... and Car is contradicting in the chat, and in the meantime his buying yes:
oh man... and Car is contradicting in the chat, and in the meantime his buying yes:
??
??
is not... I think.. holiday where?
is not... I think.. holiday where?
yeah... 70% of the time he said that, he bought. but who knows.. hahah MSTR has 8.5 billion in unrealized loss and the dude is still looking to add more dots. What if he's saying so the BTC price pumps up and then sells more? hahah
yeah... 70% of the time he said that, he bought. but who knows.. hahah MSTR has 8.5 billion in unrealized loss and the dude is still looking to add more dots. What if he's saying so the BTC price pumps up and then sells more? hahah
but for the market to resolve yes still have to announce that MSTR has bought right? That is not confirming?
but for the market to resolve yes still have to announce that MSTR has bought right? That is not confirming?
MSTR's BTC holdings aren't trackable on-chain, they are private addresses.
MSTR's BTC holdings aren't trackable on-chain, they are private addresses.
can't see anything (yet) https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001050446&type=8-K
can't see anything (yet) https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001050446&type=8-K
but announce what? they just recently sold some, will they or have they bought again? lol
but announce what? they just recently sold some, will they or have they bought again? lol
seems like speculation for now.. they didn't announce anything (yet)
seems like speculation for now.. they didn't announce anything (yet)
I didn't see any announcement yet, can that happen tomorrow? but.. have they bought more??
I didn't see any announcement yet, can that happen tomorrow? but.. have they bought more??
but eh... I knew
but eh... I knew
"did Polymarket prove with verifiable facts that Q10 qualifies?" It's no. They asserted that procedural authorisation counts as desire for independence. That's an editorial call, not a fact.
"did Polymarket prove with verifiable facts that Q10 qualifies?" It's no. They asserted that procedural authorisation counts as desire for independence. That's an editorial call, not a fact.
the second paragraph of the rules was supposed to narrow what "concerning secession" means. Polymarket effectively read the second paragraph so loosely that procedural authorisation is desire for independence. That makes the qualifying clause meaningless.
the second paragraph of the rules was supposed to narrow what "concerning secession" means. Polymarket effectively read the second paragraph so loosely that procedural authorisation is desire for independence. That makes the qualifying clause meaningless.
but they haven't yet have they? they are just talking about it?
but they haven't yet have they? they are just talking about it?
isn't he like 90% of the time?😂
isn't he like 90% of the time?😂
right, so what is he doing?
right, so what is he doing?
did that qualify as dancing or not?
did that qualify as dancing or not?
primarily voting about the decision, and only indirectly about dogs😆
primarily voting about the decision, and only indirectly about dogs😆
Give it a couple of hours...
Give it a couple of hours...
the price shown there, is that the final veredict? do you know? so is it actually under 66k?
the price shown there, is that the final veredict? do you know? so is it actually under 66k?
lol, I think the BUY and SELL prices are reversed
lol, I think the BUY and SELL prices are reversed
the No on 66
the No on 66
any of you gets this? is this an UI bug? o
any of you gets this? is this an UI bug? o
here's the transcript, look at minute [13:17]
here's the transcript, look at minute [13:17]
LETS GOO
LETS GOO
It went down to 13c for 2 secs, then back up?
It went down to 13c for 2 secs, then back up?
We can't really say.... Is PM who has the power to change the rules and say what's an insult or not lol
We can't really say.... Is PM who has the power to change the rules and say what's an insult or not lol
I'm trying to be reasonable, will we get somewhere? Lol
I'm trying to be reasonable, will we get somewhere? Lol
Damn... I really don't want to start this... It got ugly last time with the Iran live not live
Damn... I really don't want to start this... It got ugly last time with the Iran live not live
Remember that the rules say that Trump needs to announce it, those sources from other media won't count, would they?
Remember that the rules say that Trump needs to announce it, those sources from other media won't count, would they?
But when did this call happened?
But when did this call happened?
That's another one... The announcement was recent, by himself in the podcast, but when did he say it?
That's another one... The announcement was recent, by himself in the podcast, but when did he say it?
Download the transcript from the podcast, that's the one that counts, because is Trump himself acknowledging it
Download the transcript from the podcast, that's the one that counts, because is Trump himself acknowledging it
now you are using derogatory language towards me... please make a market
now you are using derogatory language towards me... please make a market
Calling someone "fucking crazy" is objectively derogatory language The market rules explicitly include "using other derogatory language" Trump himself confirmed he said it on a public podcast today
Calling someone "fucking crazy" is objectively derogatory language The market rules explicitly include "using other derogatory language" Trump himself confirmed he said it on a public podcast today
Calling someone "fucking crazy" is objectively derogatory language The market rules explicitly include "using other derogatory language" Trump himself confirmed he said it on a public podcast today
Calling someone "fucking crazy" is objectively derogatory language The market rules explicitly include "using other derogatory language" Trump himself confirmed he said it on a public podcast today
It's AI😂 JK
It's AI😂 JK
13:20
13:20
https://youtu.be/SLnB5l1PxCY?t=802
https://youtu.be/SLnB5l1PxCY?t=802
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLnB5l1PxCY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLnB5l1PxCY
Is that the transcript from the podcast?
Is that the transcript from the podcast?
Yes, we all know that Trump said that... he's an egomaniac, insults everyone, haha the problem is the rules again lol
Yes, we all know that Trump said that... he's an egomaniac, insults everyone, haha the problem is the rules again lol
oh god... another market in need of clarification from PM....
oh god... another market in need of clarification from PM....
dafuk!?
dafuk!?
or don't hahah
or don't hahah
just wait until Yes is below 45c (which it is) Buy, then wait until No is below 45c, Buy and whatever the result you win win
just wait until Yes is below 45c (which it is) Buy, then wait until No is below 45c, Buy and whatever the result you win win
but hey... still a lot of time until 30th of June
but hey... still a lot of time until 30th of June
Not from Trump anyway
Not from Trump anyway
This is Fishy...
This is Fishy...