KalshiNo
No
Azuul参与话题 21消息总数 970
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 970 条，显示第 551-600 条That's just a blatant Y as well
That's just a blatant Y as well
No it's not
No it's not
There is an entire article about game 2 with the headline "Spike Lee attends game 2"
There is an entire article about game 2 with the headline "Spike Lee attends game 2"
Arguably doesn't matter still
Arguably doesn't matter still
When you have to lie its just embarrassing
When you have to lie its just embarrassing
Spike Lee did not source where he was during the game lmfao
Spike Lee did not source where he was during the game lmfao
ESPN not a source
ESPN not a source
Their job is solely to check the facts outputted by the underlying and cross reference it against the PC before settling it based on the value
Their job is solely to check the facts outputted by the underlying and cross reference it against the PC before settling it based on the value
To figure out if he was really there or not
To figure out if he was really there or not
Its not kalshis job either
Its not kalshis job either
Its not my job
Its not my job
I dont know
I dont know
chud mfer
chud mfer
THEY DIDNT CONFLICT
THEY DIDNT CONFLICT
A material contradiction would be "during the game, he was *somewhere else* or "he did not attend the game"
A material contradiction would be "during the game, he was *somewhere else* or "he did not attend the game"
That was after the game
That was after the game
That isnt a material contradiction
That isnt a material contradiction
There is "indirect contrary evidence"
There is "indirect contrary evidence"
There is no material contradiction from the allowed sources
There is no material contradiction from the allowed sources
It's so kalshi doesnt have any liabiity when sources are wrong
It's so kalshi doesnt have any liabiity when sources are wrong
People think the revisions to the underlying are not accounted for thing is there for no reason bruh
People think the revisions to the underlying are not accounted for thing is there for no reason bruh
No you wouldnt you r*tards because youre mentally cooked by mentions cucks sportsbooks and culturebrain
No you wouldnt you r*tards because youre mentally cooked by mentions cucks sportsbooks and culturebrain
If theres a contract where the underlying is reporting from the buraeu of labor statistics(source agency) and the payout criterion is "Is the underlying inflation rate from source > 5%" and executes False/N at $0 before the latest expiration date of the contract, but then BOL corrects it an hour later at <5% would you still say Kalshi should resolve in favor of the reality of YES?
If theres a contract where the underlying is reporting from the buraeu of labor statistics(source agency) and the payout criterion is "Is the underlying inflation rate from source > 5%" and executes False/N at $0 before the latest expiration date of the contract, but then BOL corrects it an hour later at <5% would you still say Kalshi should resolve in favor of the reality of YES?
Question
Question
Chat
Chat
Im satisfied with zeroing out awwndrei though
Im satisfied with zeroing out awwndrei though
For sure
For sure
Rugpull his bodily liquidity
Rugpull his bodily liquidity
AKA liquidity
AKA liquidity
Drained of all fluids
Drained of all fluids
Then maybe
Then maybe
57k is impossible unless you fixed the crosshair to actually line up with the cursor
57k is impossible unless you fixed the crosshair to actually line up with the cursor
Now i know youre hacking
Now i know youre hacking
Its their discretion
Its their discretion
They can only rule it Y early
They can only rule it Y early
but whatever
but whatever
major alfa leak
major alfa leak
you cross-reference the Expiration Value of the Underlying against the Payout Criterion to determine the Settlement Value
you cross-reference the Expiration Value of the Underlying against the Payout Criterion to determine the Settlement Value
correcting myself
correcting myself
Yes
Yes
And cross references it against the PC
And cross references it against the PC
The contract checks the math of the underlying to determine the expiration value
The contract checks the math of the underlying to determine the expiration value
The underlying is the source of the expiration value
The underlying is the source of the expiration value
Bro
Bro
If you don't read it yes
If you don't read it yes
>in line with the contract
>in line with the contract
Bro the pressure campaign was to send it towards N
Bro the pressure campaign was to send it towards N
Problem is we have people like mitchieboi committing securities fraud to revise the underlying while the market is untradeable
Problem is we have people like mitchieboi committing securities fraud to revise the underlying while the market is untradeable
Higher than that
Higher than that