Polymarketmagiclink yea
magiclink yea
Laccs参与话题 18消息总数 884
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 884 条，显示第 801-850 条Am I though? It says ** for the public release** like review/approve aside, it literally says ** for the public release**
Am I though? It says ** for the public release** like review/approve aside, it literally says ** for the public release**
its not a review about a release at all
its not a review about a release at all
I don't know what you mean by this I think the market intention is to get legislation for reviewing models in regards to national security. EG: this model is too advanced. no release for you. this is: this model meets our standard for early access to the US gov (if devs want that) so we can bug fix our own softwares
I don't know what you mean by this I think the market intention is to get legislation for reviewing models in regards to national security. EG: this model is too advanced. no release for you. this is: this model meets our standard for early access to the US gov (if devs want that) so we can bug fix our own softwares
but broski, the review process has to be **FOR** a public release
but broski, the review process has to be **FOR** a public release
idk if it's a cuck, the market was for something different
idk if it's a cuck, the market was for something different
<:HUHH:1306492546465398815>
<:HUHH:1306492546465398815>
who's this lmao
who's this lmao
It's two different things entirely
It's two different things entirely
the review has to be about the public release of the model bro, like determining if its a hazard to national security. This "review" is to see if its good enough that it qualifies for an early access programme so the US Gov can bug fix it before the general public can hack the US gov
the review has to be about the public release of the model bro, like determining if its a hazard to national security. This "review" is to see if its good enough that it qualifies for an early access programme so the US Gov can bug fix it before the general public can hack the US gov
Exactly, simple as
Exactly, simple as
This is not a review for public release though? It's a review for qualification for the early access programme by US gov?
This is not a review for public release though? It's a review for qualification for the early access programme by US gov?
we already explained it to you
we already explained it to you
you've written this dumb shit here every 15mins
you've written this dumb shit here every 15mins
dude, can you stfu
dude, can you stfu
There's no review process outlined in the EO though? There's a benchmarking tool to see if it can be fast tracked for an early access programme to the US, of which participating is voluntary. Is benchmarking reviewing a model? And what does it have to do with the public release of the model? This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates, authorizes, or directs a federal government review process **for the public release** of new artificial intelligence models
There's no review process outlined in the EO though? There's a benchmarking tool to see if it can be fast tracked for an early access programme to the US, of which participating is voluntary. Is benchmarking reviewing a model? And what does it have to do with the public release of the model? This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates, authorizes, or directs a federal government review process **for the public release** of new artificial intelligence models
This is a market about reviewing AI models for release, not reviewing your own software using ai models though
This is a market about reviewing AI models for release, not reviewing your own software using ai models though
Where is the review in this? You're missing that this is meant for discovering vulnerabilities in US Gov software. > that coordinates and deconflicts scanning for software vulnerabilities, discovers and validates such vulnerabilities, and coordinates and prioritizes remediation and distribution of vulnerability patches.
Where is the review in this? You're missing that this is meant for discovering vulnerabilities in US Gov software. > that coordinates and deconflicts scanning for software vulnerabilities, discovers and validates such vulnerabilities, and coordinates and prioritizes remediation and distribution of vulnerability patches.
Review if its good to release to the public vs Benchmark a model to see if it qualifies for a fast track for internal usage to bugfix US gov software
Review if its good to release to the public vs Benchmark a model to see if it qualifies for a fast track for internal usage to bugfix US gov software
It has to pertain public release though
It has to pertain public release though
> Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the creation of a mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting requirement for the development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models, including frontier models.
> Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the creation of a mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting requirement for the development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models, including frontier models.
it doesn't restrict public releases
it doesn't restrict public releases
This is just early access bro
This is just early access bro
no bro, market was meant for the US gov to fully control the releases of AI models
no bro, market was meant for the US gov to fully control the releases of AI models
yes bro
yes bro
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates, authorizes, or directs a **federal government review process for the public release** of new artificial intelligence models. It's about something different
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates, authorizes, or directs a **federal government review process for the public release** of new artificial intelligence models. It's about something different
It benchmarks to see if the AI model meets the qualifications for fast tracked usage. It has nothing to do about it's public release.
It benchmarks to see if the AI model meets the qualifications for fast tracked usage. It has nothing to do about it's public release.
No?
No?
He is
He is
it asks for a review for public release. This doesn't exist here
it asks for a review for public release. This doesn't exist here
he argued YES but has no shares I think
he argued YES but has no shares I think
the EO is for fasttracking early access for themselves and partners, nothing to do with a review to allow a model release
the EO is for fasttracking early access for themselves and partners, nothing to do with a review to allow a model release
still about the public release
still about the public release
A qualifying action must create a federal process for reviewing or approving **the public release** of new artificial intelligence models.
A qualifying action must create a federal process for reviewing or approving **the public release** of new artificial intelligence models.
<:ICANT:1306491472417263636>
<:ICANT:1306491472417263636>
did he actually say this <:ICANT:1306491472417263636>
did he actually say this <:ICANT:1306491472417263636>
think it happened a few weeks ago also
think it happened a few weeks ago also
I am more careless because I know I have the popup to save me haha. Might switch to magiclink then, though this downtime for amgic isn't encouraging
I am more careless because I know I have the popup to save me haha. Might switch to magiclink then, though this downtime for amgic isn't encouraging
https://polymarket.com/event/another-iranian-diplomat-expelled-by-june-30?via=poly-bets&r=laccs#YIpZilx ```evidence: https://www.democrata.es/en/international/kuwait-orders-the-expulsion-of-two-iranian-diplomats-after-tehran-s-latest-attacks/ Kuwait’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs declared two members of the Iranian diplomatic mission persona non grata and ordered their departure within a maximum of 24 hours.```
https://polymarket.com/event/another-iranian-diplomat-expelled-by-june-30?via=poly-bets&r=laccs#YIpZilx ```evidence: https://www.democrata.es/en/international/kuwait-orders-the-expulsion-of-two-iranian-diplomats-after-tehran-s-latest-attacks/ Kuwait’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs declared two members of the Iranian diplomatic mission persona non grata and ordered their departure within a maximum of 24 hours.```
just for internal usage, fast tracked before others can use it
just for internal usage, fast tracked before others can use it
This isn't about public releases at all
This isn't about public releases at all
it's a framework that allows for early access to the gov. market requires **federal government review process for the public release **
it's a framework that allows for early access to the gov. market requires **federal government review process for the public release **
there's no review process though
there's no review process though
not about reviewing if its good for release
not about reviewing if its good for release
The whole thing is for early access to the gov and trusted partners
The whole thing is for early access to the gov and trusted partners
c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the creation of a mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting requirement for the development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models, including frontier models.
c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the creation of a mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting requirement for the development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models, including frontier models.
It's voluntary
It's voluntary
Thats not a review process
Thats not a review process
https://polymarket.com/event/trump-orders-federal-review-for-ai-model-releases-by-may-31/trump-orders-federal-review-of-ai-model-releases-by-june-30?r=laccs#YIpZilx
https://polymarket.com/event/trump-orders-federal-review-for-ai-model-releases-by-may-31/trump-orders-federal-review-of-ai-model-releases-by-june-30?r=laccs#YIpZilx
> The Order expressly states that nothing shall be construed to authorize creation of any mandatory governmental licensing, pre-clearance, or permitting requirement for the development, publication, release or distribution of AI models.
> The Order expressly states that nothing shall be construed to authorize creation of any mandatory governmental licensing, pre-clearance, or permitting requirement for the development, publication, release or distribution of AI models.