PolymarketYeah but double dispute
Yeah but double dispute
Hakei参与话题 29消息总数 895
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 895 条，显示第 601-650 条Like I understand the purpose of a dispute process that enables that and that's generally good for many reasons, but good lord it sucks
Like I understand the purpose of a dispute process that enables that and that's generally good for many reasons, but good lord it sucks
What I really fucking hate is that June 15 is at 96c, but I don't want to purchase the position for a nice free payday because it's at risk of terrorist dispute forcing and fund lockdown for 4+ days
What I really fucking hate is that June 15 is at 96c, but I don't want to purchase the position for a nice free payday because it's at risk of terrorist dispute forcing and fund lockdown for 4+ days
Literally saying "No, we don't agree: we're staying in Lebanon"
Literally saying "No, we don't agree: we're staying in Lebanon"
It's just so damning how wrong your claim is that Israel has agreed to it
It's just so damning how wrong your claim is that Israel has agreed to it
Like it's really just as simple as going to NYTimes
Like it's really just as simple as going to NYTimes
You: " Both agreed to respect the deal's content" Bibi: "I do not feel bound by the agreement"
You: " Both agreed to respect the deal's content" Bibi: "I do not feel bound by the agreement"
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/15/world/middleeast/netanyahu-israel-iran.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/15/world/middleeast/netanyahu-israel-iran.html
Israel has specifically stated that they weren't a part of the deal. What do you mean when you say "They agree to respect the deal's contents"?
Israel has specifically stated that they weren't a part of the deal. What do you mean when you say "They agree to respect the deal's contents"?
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/hezbollah-welcomes-us-iran-mou-thanks-iran-for-including-lebanon-in-deal/ Are you happy with this source?
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/hezbollah-welcomes-us-iran-mou-thanks-iran-for-including-lebanon-in-deal/ Are you happy with this source?
I need you to provide the source that I know *doesn't* confirm what you're saying so I can discuss it with you further.
I need you to provide the source that I know *doesn't* confirm what you're saying so I can discuss it with you further.
"Hezbollah have provided clear public confirmation" Where?
"Hezbollah have provided clear public confirmation" Where?
See, barely any blocks
See, barely any blocks
It's unfair to the people trading here to waste their time with bad faith discussion tactics
It's unfair to the people trading here to waste their time with bad faith discussion tactics
Anyone engaging in a good faith discussion of facts needs to be able to respond to questions - if they don't do that and keep copy/pasting spam, they're worthy of a block
Anyone engaging in a good faith discussion of facts needs to be able to respond to questions - if they don't do that and keep copy/pasting spam, they're worthy of a block
No, it's the inability to focus on the discussion at hand and the things that have been asked directly to the person.
No, it's the inability to focus on the discussion at hand and the things that have been asked directly to the person.
Dunno, 20? 30? At least 300 combined IQ points.
Dunno, 20? 30? At least 300 combined IQ points.
Block and move on fellas. Let him shout into the void.
Block and move on fellas. Let him shout into the void.
I'm now blocking ydak, **citing the IQ insufficiency clause attached to joining this Discord server**. I encourage everyone else to do the same.
I'm now blocking ydak, **citing the IQ insufficiency clause attached to joining this Discord server**. I encourage everyone else to do the same.
<@930737463163494430> This guy has copy/pasted this 4 times in the last 15 minutes, can you tell him to stop clearing chat history with the spam
<@930737463163494430> This guy has copy/pasted this 4 times in the last 15 minutes, can you tell him to stop clearing chat history with the spam
These people have to be ill, or trolling, or something
These people have to be ill, or trolling, or something
Honestly this is so bizarre.
Honestly this is so bizarre.
Are you happy to pay for the proposal?
Are you happy to pay for the proposal?
A consensus of credible reporting said they signed the deal electronically, which is sufficient. Not a single credible source has said Israel has signed anything. This is the big difference between the two.
A consensus of credible reporting said they signed the deal electronically, which is sufficient. Not a single credible source has said Israel has signed anything. This is the big difference between the two.
This one's June 15.
This one's June 15.
I don't want to be locked into another 3-day bond terrorism situation.
I don't want to be locked into another 3-day bond terrorism situation.
Is June 15 double disputed?
Is June 15 double disputed?
? The English language and governance of logic decided that.
? The English language and governance of logic decided that.
The rules are making that option an option.
The rules are making that option an option.
You can have a broader peace deal that Israel signs. That's possible. It hasn't happened - but it's possible.
You can have a broader peace deal that Israel signs. That's possible. It hasn't happened - but it's possible.
The broader peace deal still requires either of those two conditions to be met.
The broader peace deal still requires either of those two conditions to be met.
The rules EXPLICITLY require either of those two conditions to be met.
The rules EXPLICITLY require either of those two conditions to be met.
No. I want to focus on the two resolution criteria that are pertinent to the discussion.
No. I want to focus on the two resolution criteria that are pertinent to the discussion.
Which of these two has Reuters/AP/NYT substantiated?
Which of these two has Reuters/AP/NYT substantiated?
This is incorrect, per the rules. You have not substantiated whether you think #1 or #2 has been reported by a consensus of credible media.
This is incorrect, per the rules. You have not substantiated whether you think #1 or #2 has been reported by a consensus of credible media.
Correction: Hezbollah hasn't "Agreed". It just says that it "welcomes" the agreement that it wasn't a part of.
Correction: Hezbollah hasn't "Agreed". It just says that it "welcomes" the agreement that it wasn't a part of.
Is this guy trolling? I can't tell if he's trolling.
Is this guy trolling? I can't tell if he's trolling.
A simple "No" would have sufficied. I welcome the MOU too. Doesn't mean I signed it.
A simple "No" would have sufficied. I welcome the MOU too. Doesn't mean I signed it.
Can you point to the exact quote where it says Hezbollah agreed to a deal?
Can you point to the exact quote where it says Hezbollah agreed to a deal?
Today has been insane for fleecing people on markets that are so obviously incorrectly proposed. It's wild.
Today has been insane for fleecing people on markets that are so obviously incorrectly proposed. It's wild.
Again, this is very simple: which of these two criteria has media credibly reported on?
Again, this is very simple: which of these two criteria has media credibly reported on?
Sir, your argument fails because you've yet to substantiate which of the two criteria for a qualifying agreement a consensus of credible reporting has substantiated.
Sir, your argument fails because you've yet to substantiate which of the two criteria for a qualifying agreement a consensus of credible reporting has substantiated.
Arguably?
Arguably?
There's no qualifying peace deal that they've signed.
There's no qualifying peace deal that they've signed.
Which one has been met and reported by a consensus of reporting?
Which one has been met and reported by a consensus of reporting?
You do. Either of those conditions have to be met.
You do. Either of those conditions have to be met.
This is beyond bizarre.
This is beyond bizarre.
You require a consensus of credible reporting that both Israel and Hezbollah signed a qualifying agreement. You haven't done that.
You require a consensus of credible reporting that both Israel and Hezbollah signed a qualifying agreement. You haven't done that.
I cannot have conversations with people who present statements in bad faith and ignore questions to mention irrelevant things, good day 👍🏾
I cannot have conversations with people who present statements in bad faith and ignore questions to mention irrelevant things, good day 👍🏾
You didn't answer my question.
You didn't answer my question.