聊天记录
共 1318 条，显示第 901-950 条
lord MYTHOS: Every operative word in this market points one direction in time. The resolution criterion is "announces that Project Freedom will be restarted" — stated twice — and the surrounding machinery only makes sense for prospective statements. The rider that announcements count "regardless of whether or when the announced program goes into effect" exists to protect YES holders from a program that's promised but delayed or never executed; "whether" it goes into effect can only be an open question for an announcement that precedes implementation. The rider presupposes the announce-then-act sequence — it doesn't retroactively convert narration of history into a restart announcement. The definitiveness sentence confirms the same architecture: the excluded categories — suggestions, expressions of openness, reported preparations — are a graded spectrum of future-directed statements, and the rule is calibrating how firm a commitment to future action must be before it counts. A statement containing no future content at all isn't a weak entry on that spectrum; it's categorically outside the thing being measured. Had the drafters wanted disclosures of past or ongoing operations to qualify, they'd have written "announces that such a program has been, is being, or will be conducted." They wrote only "will be restarted."
Measured against that standard, the post contains nothing to resolve on. Every verb is past tense or present perfect: a directive issued "last month," results that "have" accumulated, ships that "have" traveled. There is no "will," no "continue," no "resume," no "going forward" — and the framing is affirmatively terminal: results are tallied, victory is declared, "It's over for Iran." That is a eulogy for an operation, not a commitment to one. Even crediting the Oval Office remarks that oil has been moving out nightly and was being announced for the first time as implying the operation is ongoing, an announcement that something is secretly happening is still not an announcement that it will be restarted — there is no "is occurring" prong in these rules, and inferring continuation from silence violates the requirement that only definitive announcements qualify. The YES reading also produces an absurdity the rules can't bear: the directive Trump described predates or roughly coincides with the market's open, meaning the market would resolve on conduct that existed before the question was even asked, merely because it was narrated inside the window. That transforms a forward-looking event market into a disclosure lottery — whoever happens to declassify history first decides resolution. The market priced whether a restart would be promised by the deadline. No promise was made
lord MYTHOS: Every operative word in this market points one direction in time. The resolution criterion is "announces that Project Freedom will be restarted" — stated twice — and the surrounding machinery only makes sense for prospective statements. The rider that announcements count "regardless of whether or when the announced program goes into effect" exists to protect YES holders from a program that's promised but delayed or never executed; "whether" it goes into effect can only be an open question for an announcement that precedes implementation. The rider presupposes the announce-then-act sequence — it doesn't retroactively convert narration of history into a restart announcement. The definitiveness sentence confirms the same architecture: the excluded categories — suggestions, expressions of openness, reported preparations — are a graded spectrum of future-directed statements, and the rule is calibrating how firm a commitment to future action must be before it counts. A statement containing no future content at all isn't a weak entry on that spectrum; it's categorically outside the thing being measured. Had the drafters wanted disclosures of past or ongoing operations to qualify, they'd have written "announces that such a program has been, is being, or will be conducted." They wrote only "will be restarted."
Measured against that standard, the post contains nothing to resolve on. Every verb is past tense or present perfect: a directive issued "last month," results that "have" accumulated, ships that "have" traveled. There is no "will," no "continue," no "resume," no "going forward" — and the framing is affirmatively terminal: results are tallied, victory is declared, "It's over for Iran." That is a eulogy for an operation, not a commitment to one. Even crediting the Oval Office remarks that oil has been moving out nightly and was being announced for the first time as implying the operation is ongoing, an announcement that something is secretly happening is still not an announcement that it will be restarted — there is no "is occurring" prong in these rules, and inferring continuation from silence violates the requirement that only definitive announcements qualify. The YES reading also produces an absurdity the rules can't bear: the directive Trump described predates or roughly coincides with the market's open, meaning the market would resolve on conduct that existed before the question was even asked, merely because it was narrated inside the window. That transforms a forward-looking event market into a disclosure lottery — whoever happens to declassify history first decides resolution. The market priced whether a restart would be promised by the deadline. No promise was made
the losing has already occured
the losing has already occured
"I have lost my keys" is also present perfect with nothing whatsoever to do with a present or future action
"I have lost my keys" is also present perfect with nothing whatsoever to do with a present or future action
how is that clear???
how is that clear???
that's where the word have appears, your point is retarded <@570563844678877196>
that's where the word have appears, your point is retarded <@570563844678877196>
Today, I am pleased to announce that this effort has resulted in more than 100 MILLION Barrels of Oil making its way through the Straight, and into the Open Market. More than 200 Commercial Ships have safely traveled through the Strait.
Today, I am pleased to announce that this effort has resulted in more than 100 MILLION Barrels of Oil making its way through the Straight, and into the Open Market. More than 200 Commercial Ships have safely traveled through the Strait.
you could say either
you could say either
there is nothing in that statement saying whether you are still selling shirts or if you ever will sell another
there is nothing in that statement saying whether you are still selling shirts or if you ever will sell another
maybe maybe not??? literally that's the point
maybe maybe not??? literally that's the point
not clear
not clear
there is not enough here to know what and when and his entire announcement is past tense <@1272383282687905939> <@941405798096076880> His announcement could literally be covering actions that occured prior to market creation on 5/22
there is not enough here to know what and when and his entire announcement is past tense <@1272383282687905939> <@941405798096076880> His announcement could literally be covering actions that occured prior to market creation on 5/22
<@1272383282687905939> His announcement could literally be covering actions that occured prior to market creation on 5/22
<@1272383282687905939> His announcement could literally be covering actions that occured prior to market creation on 5/22
easiest p4:** His announcement could literally be covering actions that occured prior to market creation on 5/22**
easiest p4:** His announcement could literally be covering actions that occured prior to market creation on 5/22**
His announcement could literally be covering actions that occured prior to market creation on 5/22
His announcement could literally be covering actions that occured prior to market creation on 5/22
sounds scammy
sounds scammy
what's your gripe, which market
what's your gripe, which market
is liquid degen a retard? if so what is he arguing about?
is liquid degen a retard? if so what is he arguing about?
i tried searching but it froze
i tried searching but it froze
i would find that "description of capital stock" referencd in the screenshot and see what it says
i would find that "description of capital stock" referencd in the screenshot and see what it says
is yahoo finance resolution source? Seems like class b should count
is yahoo finance resolution source? Seems like class b should count
lol gayshi
lol gayshi
it's mythos adjacent
it's mythos adjacent
is there a press release
is there a press release
that's already happened
that's already happened
still a no
still a no
Statements that merely reference violations, breaches, or non-compliance with the ceasefire will not alone qualify.
Statements that merely reference violations, breaches, or non-compliance with the ceasefire will not alone qualify.
why do you keep saying hecker
why do you keep saying hecker
banhammer coming
banhammer coming
thanks bro
thanks bro
bel since you're here, i'd like to request "vro" and "crine" and all variations to be censored from this server and be bannable
bel since you're here, i'd like to request "vro" and "crine" and all variations to be censored from this server and be bannable
can someone ping me if aekgas deposits a large amount
can someone ping me if aekgas deposits a large amount
yea don't do that
yea don't do that
jfc
jfc
wait people actually use e-mail to log in ??/
wait people actually use e-mail to log in ??/
anyone who chooses jessicaonlytard as their overlord/chief retard deserves what they get
anyone who chooses jessicaonlytard as their overlord/chief retard deserves what they get
they clarify almost everything now so basically they don't and i doubt uma will exist for much longer
they clarify almost everything now so basically they don't and i doubt uma will exist for much longer
so uma is not only retarded but they are soft
so uma is not only retarded but they are soft
how is that bannable
how is that bannable
A troglodyte is literally a cave dweller or someone who lives underground. By extension, the term is used as an insult to describe a reclusive, unrefined person, or someone with outdated, reactionary views who is deliberately resistant to modern society and technology.
A troglodyte is literally a cave dweller or someone who lives underground. By extension, the term is used as an insult to describe a reclusive, unrefined person, or someone with outdated, reactionary views who is deliberately resistant to modern society and technology.
troglodyte
troglodyte
already saying "vro" and "crine" both of which should be bannable here imo. not helping you
already saying "vro" and "crine" both of which should be bannable here imo. not helping you
yea honestly this
yea honestly this
felt bad for kelly
felt bad for kelly
lol i was gonna ask them too
lol i was gonna ask them too
they banned you from entire server? you should dm a mod and just say you didn't know the rules
they banned you from entire server? you should dm a mod and just say you didn't know the rules
what did you get banned for
what did you get banned for
lol
lol
wtf is a troglodyte
wtf is a troglodyte
that's a lame ban
that's a lame ban
oh i thought this was a burner account
oh i thought this was a burner account
Polymarket