该用户的聊天记录定位。
I've stated in this channel previously that I think those are public, but I do think there are arguments on both sides. Again, we'll see what the "truth oracle" will say
I've stated in this channel previously that I think those are public, but I do think there are arguments on both sides. Again, we'll see what the "truth oracle" will say
i believe this is the first attempt to get one of those through, so you'll need to convice the fat ladyboy
i believe this is the first attempt to get one of those through, so you'll need to convice the fat ladyboy
when you decide whether to bomb someone in the middle of a peace negotiation you are making a judgement call
when you decide whether to bomb someone in the middle of a peace negotiation you are making a judgement call
if he had ended that tirade with "i told him, he's a fucking chump" your argument would be much stronger
if he had ended that tirade with "i told him, he's a fucking chump" your argument would be much stronger
also the context obv
also the context obv
i think your argument fails mainly because judgement is directly related to policy decisions
i think your argument fails mainly because judgement is directly related to policy decisions
not continuing in circles on something so ridiculous
not continuing in circles on something so ridiculous
we don't have to get into hypotheticals
we don't have to get into hypotheticals
just read the text
just read the text
you think that wasn't in reference to policy so you are either debilitatingly biased by your bags, arguing in bad faith, or dumb
you think that wasn't in reference to policy so you are either debilitatingly biased by your bags, arguing in bad faith, or dumb
he literally describes what he did (policy decision to bomb lebanon) and says "I was so pissed off. I let him know. He has no fucking judgement."
he literally describes what he did (policy decision to bomb lebanon) and says "I was so pissed off. I let him know. He has no fucking judgement."
if you're arguing the below quote is not in reference to policy you are arguing in bad faith plain and simple "It is so bad — I couldn't believe it. An hour before we are supposed to sign the deal." Trump acknowledged Hezbollah attacked Israel first but stressed it didn't cause any damage and nobody had been killed. "Why did Bibi have to do a fucking attack? I was so pissed off. I let him know. He has no fucking judgement. I let him know that," Trump said.
if you're arguing the below quote is not in reference to policy you are arguing in bad faith plain and simple "It is so bad — I couldn't believe it. An hour before we are supposed to sign the deal." Trump acknowledged Hezbollah attacked Israel first but stressed it didn't cause any damage and nobody had been killed. "Why did Bibi have to do a fucking attack? I was so pissed off. I let him know. He has no fucking judgement. I let him know that," Trump said.
obv
obv
it's in direct reference to his bombing of lebanon, arguing otherwise is simply bad faith
it's in direct reference to his bombing of lebanon, arguing otherwise is simply bad faith
no the other fat asian man larping as a skinny asian woman
no the other fat asian man larping as a skinny asian woman
he's obv talking about policy
he's obv talking about policy
the example of a non-qualifying policy insult is also personal
the example of a non-qualifying policy insult is also personal
you're assuming he has to mention policy, even when it's patently obvious that the statement is in regards to policy
you're assuming he has to mention policy, even when it's patently obvious that the statement is in regards to policy
negative forms of positive traits in reference to policy
negative forms of positive traits in reference to policy
You'll also have to convince the fat larper that a private (on the record) call with a reporter is public
You'll also have to convince the fat larper that a private (on the record) call with a reporter is public
no the rules are literally saying negative forms of positive traits when used in reference to policy don't count. He's obv talking about policy with the no judgement comment
no the rules are literally saying negative forms of positive traits when used in reference to policy don't count. He's obv talking about policy with the no judgement comment
there's literally an example in the rules of a non qualifying negative form of a positive trait e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) , just as personal. He has no judgement [wrt policy] He is not smart [wrt policy] Both are the same
there's literally an example in the rules of a non qualifying negative form of a positive trait e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) , just as personal. He has no judgement [wrt policy] He is not smart [wrt policy] Both are the same
it is in the context of the statement, clearly he's not referring to his judgement on investing, or choosing restaurants.
it is in the context of the statement, clearly he's not referring to his judgement on investing, or choosing restaurants.
it's obv in reference to him bombing lebanon
it's obv in reference to him bombing lebanon
no judgement is a negative form of a positive trait in reference to policy
no judgement is a negative form of a positive trait in reference to policy
You can say someone's had a bad moment in a neutral way but implying that his bad moment could cause you not to be friends with them clearly adds a negative connotation
You can say someone's had a bad moment in a neutral way but implying that his bad moment could cause you not to be friends with them clearly adds a negative connotation
borderline but lean yes, particularly the use of the word "but"
borderline but lean yes, particularly the use of the word "but"
I wonder how much No they bought before posting
I wonder how much No they bought before posting
Fucking retards
Fucking retards
What happened to leb
What happened to leb
no stash for one
no stash for one
lol no
lol no
no idea what all these zero day accounts are doing kind of odd
no idea what all these zero day accounts are doing kind of odd
it was an announcement of a future announcement
it was an announcement of a future announcement
i thought you were a four corners absolutist?
i thought you were a four corners absolutist?
i'm gonna need a flow chart
i'm gonna need a flow chart
where's the nearest four seasons?
where's the nearest four seasons?
did you visit?
did you visit?
four corners bro, what are you complaining about?
four corners bro, what are you complaining about?
it's within the four corners of the TOS
it's within the four corners of the TOS
It's immoral to let a sucker keep his money
It's immoral to let a sucker keep his money
bro trump-xi literally said broadcast live, your "four corners" interpretation was wrong and dumb
bro trump-xi literally said broadcast live, your "four corners" interpretation was wrong and dumb
as a "four corners" advocate, how on earth could he have not liked that clarif?
as a "four corners" advocate, how on earth could he have not liked that clarif?
you think they need your consent? Which trump-xi?
you think they need your consent? Which trump-xi?
are you mad about their ads or the flotilla clarif?
are you mad about their ads or the flotilla clarif?
UMA is terrible and egab is retarded. Both can be true at the same time
UMA is terrible and egab is retarded. Both can be true at the same time
so domer manages to crash the lebanon market just by buying N, sells almost immediately, 50p sells too and it's still at 18?
so domer manages to crash the lebanon market just by buying N, sells almost immediately, 50p sells too and it's still at 18?
gm
gm
Makes total sense
Makes total sense
You’re saying we shouldn’t resolve markets when it requires a brain more advanced than a 6-year old to understand why?
You’re saying we shouldn’t resolve markets when it requires a brain more advanced than a 6-year old to understand why?
Polymarket