PolymarketshingoWAKAYAMA seems like a sharp dude
shingoWAKAYAMA seems like a sharp dude
arbguy参与话题 16消息总数 1318
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 1318 条，显示第 1151-1200 条ai
ai
idk, but incentive isn't there to propose right now, I have an $800 position and proposing is equivalent of buying $1500 worth at 66c. Someone else should do it
idk, but incentive isn't there to propose right now, I have an $800 position and proposing is equivalent of buying $1500 worth at 66c. Someone else should do it
why propose when it's guaranteed to get disputed and current share price is better risk/reward?
why propose when it's guaranteed to get disputed and current share price is better risk/reward?
truly remarkable. After all the shit he gave Car for doing the same thing
truly remarkable. After all the shit he gave Car for doing the same thing
small one yes
small one yes
not like people are trading markets that have already been decided
not like people are trading markets that have already been decided
yea so much smart money being thrown around
yea so much smart money being thrown around
<@1361217824776786031> legal advice, please take it
<@1361217824776786031> legal advice, please take it
that's just some retard
that's just some retard
who cares about the tweet, just read the damn EO
who cares about the tweet, just read the damn EO
watch out!
watch out!
why create a distinction between review and approval when iyo they are the same
why create a distinction between review and approval when iyo they are the same
"Non-binding statements, proposals, unconfirmed reports, or federal review of artificial intelligence models solely for government procurement or internal government use will not qualify." This isn't saying anything must be mandatory or gating, just that a proposal or statement won't qualify. Only codified law/exec actions
"Non-binding statements, proposals, unconfirmed reports, or federal review of artificial intelligence models solely for government procurement or internal government use will not qualify." This isn't saying anything must be mandatory or gating, just that a proposal or statement won't qualify. Only codified law/exec actions
it is binding, the relevent agencies must follow the EO.
it is binding, the relevent agencies must follow the EO.
(a) develop and maintain a classified benchmarking process to assess the advanced cyber capabilities of AI models and determine the threshold at which an AI model should be designated a “covered frontier model” for the purposes of this order, sharing such assessments with AI developers and researchers as appropriate. Such a determination shall be made by the Director of NSA, in consultation with the National Cyber Director, the APST, the Director of CISA, and other representatives of the Department of War, as appropriate. This is discretionary
(a) develop and maintain a classified benchmarking process to assess the advanced cyber capabilities of AI models and determine the threshold at which an AI model should be designated a “covered frontier model” for the purposes of this order, sharing such assessments with AI developers and researchers as appropriate. Such a determination shall be made by the Director of NSA, in consultation with the National Cyber Director, the APST, the Director of CISA, and other representatives of the Department of War, as appropriate. This is discretionary
asking is part of the review process.
asking is part of the review process.
there's a process for reviewing. You ask, then you review
there's a process for reviewing. You ask, then you review
that's still a review
that's still a review
reviewing OR approving
reviewing OR approving
it's a yes
it's a yes
we're just going to have to ask ourselves what jesus would do in that situation
we're just going to have to ask ourselves what jesus would do in that situation
we need those blockchain scammers to secure the ship
we need those blockchain scammers to secure the ship
thanks for clarifying, you are truly a brilliant thinker
thanks for clarifying, you are truly a brilliant thinker
glad scout secured his seat
glad scout secured his seat
great point, thanks for clarifying
great point, thanks for clarifying
i need handlers
i need handlers
no he's a fucking scammer who would buy positions in markets where simply posting his vote in UMA would move the price. He also commited fraud and financial crimes by spoofing markets
no he's a fucking scammer who would buy positions in markets where simply posting his vote in UMA would move the price. He also commited fraud and financial crimes by spoofing markets
the arbiter of truth
the arbiter of truth
let's count to the chase here and get rid of UMA for good <@941405798096076880>
let's count to the chase here and get rid of UMA for good <@941405798096076880>
jessica should have no say in anthing
jessica should have no say in anthing
clarif
clarif
didn't the first round of voting happen regardless of whether there is an annulment?
didn't the first round of voting happen regardless of whether there is an annulment?
yes for dispute but clarifications generally happen after dispute
yes for dispute but clarifications generally happen after dispute
<#1508898919101235242>
<#1508898919101235242>
The great Camal has spoken
The great Camal has spoken
as domer said, look to who are the biggest winners as this result is foul smelling and frankly disgusting
as domer said, look to who are the biggest winners as this result is foul smelling and frankly disgusting
bro vene is a country of laws, we must respect the laws of venezuela and their legitmiate president Maduro
bro vene is a country of laws, we must respect the laws of venezuela and their legitmiate president Maduro
virtuous guy who kept saying Poly should resolve to yes despite consensus being reached causing even more retards to burn even more money on a guaranteed losing bet
virtuous guy who kept saying Poly should resolve to yes despite consensus being reached causing even more retards to burn even more money on a guaranteed losing bet
now he's blaming people that bought NO
now he's blaming people that bought NO
Yea true. No incentive for p1 proposal
Yea true. No incentive for p1 proposal
Why hasn’t anyone proposed
Why hasn’t anyone proposed
Providing the government access is a condition placed on the government? It’s a voluntary review process which was created
Providing the government access is a condition placed on the government? It’s a voluntary review process which was created
it's a review process
it's a review process
"provide the Federal Government with access to covered frontier models, subject to appropriate confidentiality, cybersecurity, insider-risk, and intellectual-property protection, use, and nondisclosure requirements, for a period of up to 30 days **before **they plan to release such models to other trusted partners." it clearly has conditions, even if voluntary, pertaining to release
"provide the Federal Government with access to covered frontier models, subject to appropriate confidentiality, cybersecurity, insider-risk, and intellectual-property protection, use, and nondisclosure requirements, for a period of up to 30 days **before **they plan to release such models to other trusted partners." it clearly has conditions, even if voluntary, pertaining to release
reviewing qualifies for either
reviewing qualifies for either
this doesn't change the meaning
this doesn't change the meaning
It's a review
It's a review
you're making a gating argument which is not required by the rules
you're making a gating argument which is not required by the rules
doesn't need to approve them
doesn't need to approve them