PolymarketPakistan also said it was permanent
Pakistan also said it was permanent
arbguy参与话题 16消息总数 1318
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 1318 条，显示第 401-450 条The Iranians already said it's permanent.
The Iranians already said it's permanent.
final deal = nuclear. Why do you keep grasping
final deal = nuclear. Why do you keep grasping
they're not talking about what's required, only who/what the resolution sources are. Sorry that you didn't understand the rules of the markert.
they're not talking about what's required, only who/what the resolution sources are. Sorry that you didn't understand the rules of the markert.
you shouldn't have to read the rules and understand them? I'm just showing you the comparason to help you understand.
you shouldn't have to read the rules and understand them? I'm just showing you the comparason to help you understand.
these aren't precedents they're just the actual rules as written
these aren't precedents they're just the actual rules as written
read rules with bilateral confirmation and read these rules again. If you still don't understand i can't help you. That AND statement is simply stating the resolution source not that both countries need to confirm
read rules with bilateral confirmation and read these rules again. If you still don't understand i can't help you. That AND statement is simply stating the resolution source not that both countries need to confirm
wrong, this market does not require bilateral confirmation and I would never make such a retarded argument
wrong, this market does not require bilateral confirmation and I would never make such a retarded argument
brain damage much?
brain damage much?
fucking idiots
fucking idiots
SENIOR US OFFICIAL: TRUMP AND VANCE SIGNED MOU, AND SO DID THE IRANIAN PARLIAMENTARY SPEAKER
SENIOR US OFFICIAL: TRUMP AND VANCE SIGNED MOU, AND SO DID THE IRANIAN PARLIAMENTARY SPEAKER
anyone from iran is sufficient. It's clear from Vance's response both parties signed.
anyone from iran is sufficient. It's clear from Vance's response both parties signed.
so if media wasn't in the room the cannot be used?
so if media wasn't in the room the cannot be used?
wow too bad vance is a private citizen
wow too bad vance is a private citizen
sorry I can't help you
sorry I can't help you
did you listen to the question he was responding to
did you listen to the question he was responding to
"so if Iran signs on friday they get xxx?" Vance: "Well we actually signed it digitally yesterday" He's responding to a question about iran signing on friday by saying well actually we already signed it
"so if Iran signs on friday they get xxx?" Vance: "Well we actually signed it digitally yesterday" He's responding to a question about iran signing on friday by saying well actually we already signed it
did you listen to it? are you ESL?
did you listen to it? are you ESL?
It's very clear both parties signed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adKbHPBumVM&t=218s
It's very clear both parties signed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adKbHPBumVM&t=218s
True story, yesterday morning someone dmed me asking for money. I told him no ike 10 times. He was super persistant. I ended up giving him $5. That karma led to world peace!
True story, yesterday morning someone dmed me asking for money. I told him no ike 10 times. He was super persistant. I ended up giving him $5. That karma led to world peace!
billy is retarded but not that retarded
billy is retarded but not that retarded
another failure to correect the supossed matarial lie by Sharif, cheif mediator
another failure to correect the supossed matarial lie by Sharif, cheif mediator
it's funny he made a lot of money on MSTR market and is now arguing (incorrectly btw) for some strict/narrow/autistic interpretation of these rules
it's funny he made a lot of money on MSTR market and is now arguing (incorrectly btw) for some strict/narrow/autistic interpretation of these rules
NYT clearly states they are not reporting on the text of the *actual * MOU but rather statements made to them by "officials" previously about whart *might * be in an MOU
NYT clearly states they are not reporting on the text of the *actual * MOU but rather statements made to them by "officials" previously about whart *might * be in an MOU
we're talking about the actual participants of the deal here making statements
we're talking about the actual participants of the deal here making statements
need israel/iran to say they agree to it
need israel/iran to say they agree to it
So trump chose to correct him when he made a false statement. His ommission of any correction here is telling then
So trump chose to correct him when he made a false statement. His ommission of any correction here is telling then
There's also WH news update saying it "ended" the war, and Trump's anouncement coming after Sharif's, clearly coordinated, leaving notards somehow having us believe there was a material lie in Sharif's statement that has yet to be corrected
There's also WH news update saying it "ended" the war, and Trump's anouncement coming after Sharif's, clearly coordinated, leaving notards somehow having us believe there was a material lie in Sharif's statement that has yet to be corrected
i agree he's a scamming thief for draining mango, even if the prosecutor fucked up venue allowing for the vacating of the commodities fraud conviction
i agree he's a scamming thief for draining mango, even if the prosecutor fucked up venue allowing for the vacating of the commodities fraud conviction
No, i'm saying if every party to the agreement says it's effective then it's effective. Speculative reporting does not supercede the announcements of the parties
No, i'm saying if every party to the agreement says it's effective then it's effective. Speculative reporting does not supercede the announcements of the parties
because he bought 3.2mm no shares and is trying to scam
because he bought 3.2mm no shares and is trying to scam
not from the parties themselves, jfc
not from the parties themselves, jfc
all sides say effective as of last night, this is pure nonsense and even worse cope than your previous arguments
all sides say effective as of last night, this is pure nonsense and even worse cope than your previous arguments
exploiting young children is far worse than any financial crime. Just my opinion, you do you
exploiting young children is far worse than any financial crime. Just my opinion, you do you
um yes by a lot
um yes by a lot
but you drained Mango, right?
but you drained Mango, right?
no: https://www.yahoo.com/news/mango-markets-exploiter-avi-eisenberg-205309189.html
no: https://www.yahoo.com/news/mango-markets-exploiter-avi-eisenberg-205309189.html
i don't think your username bothers people as much as the pedo stuff/financial crimes
i don't think your username bothers people as much as the pedo stuff/financial crimes
are you now denying that you're Avraham Eisenberg?
are you now denying that you're Avraham Eisenberg?
he must be in some sort of summer camp style facility or halfway house
he must be in some sort of summer camp style facility or halfway house
try looking at everything instead of dissmissing everything that contradicts your view/position and only focusing on what does not
try looking at everything instead of dissmissing everything that contradicts your view/position and only focusing on what does not
Has no bearing whatsoever on this market but I'm fairly certain I read shortly after announcement the reason they needed until Friday was for demining operations
Has no bearing whatsoever on this market but I'm fairly certain I read shortly after announcement the reason they needed until Friday was for demining operations
you don't have to gamble, you can bet on things that have already happened like perma peace
you don't have to gamble, you can bet on things that have already happened like perma peace
just check the chain bro
just check the chain bro
"Lasting", just like "ending", are not words people use to describe things that are temporary in nature.
"Lasting", just like "ending", are not words people use to describe things that are temporary in nature.
copium
copium
because he bought 3.2mm no shares and is trying to scam the market
because he bought 3.2mm no shares and is trying to scam the market
it should be illegal to give him access to a computer in whatever halfway house or whatever he's in
it should be illegal to give him access to a computer in whatever halfway house or whatever he's in
Trump's tweet came *after *Sharif's. But notards would like us to believe there was a material lie in Sharif's tweet.
Trump's tweet came *after *Sharif's. But notards would like us to believe there was a material lie in Sharif's tweet.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/mango-markets-exploiter-avi-eisenberg-205309189.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/mango-markets-exploiter-avi-eisenberg-205309189.html