PolymarketSuppose I propose MicroStrategy at 11:59:58 PM, I will be P4ed.
Suppose I propose MicroStrategy at 11:59:58 PM, I will be P4ed.
Abhi参与话题 60消息总数 1683
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 1683 条，显示第 1501-1550 条Shouldn't the title be 11:59:59 PM ET?
Shouldn't the title be 11:59:59 PM ET?
gm
gm
When I proposed this the volume was like 1m and now its like 120m all because of the double disputes.
When I proposed this the volume was like 1m and now its like 120m all because of the double disputes.
Only difference is those markets had less than a million volume.
Only difference is those markets had less than a million volume.
Only if people knew how to check the proposal times and when it is sufficient for N it wouldn't have been a problem. I agree with you there could've been additional rules mentioned in the ruleset. It was clarified thrice in past for the same thing and 1 UMA precedent for it.
Only if people knew how to check the proposal times and when it is sufficient for N it wouldn't have been a problem. I agree with you there could've been additional rules mentioned in the ruleset. It was clarified thrice in past for the same thing and 1 UMA precedent for it.
Someone disputed it 2x so it had to stay for another 3 days but it was supposed to be closed at 12 AM ET
Someone disputed it 2x so it had to stay for another 3 days but it was supposed to be closed at 12 AM ET
Because that was the deadline
Because that was the deadline
There is a reason that market got proposed N at 12 AM ET
There is a reason that market got proposed N at 12 AM ET
They won't take it back
They won't take it back
There's simply no reason to buy it
There's simply no reason to buy it
This isn't UMA decision. This is a decision made by Polymarket team itself.
This isn't UMA decision. This is a decision made by Polymarket team itself.
Interesting, maybe just enjoy the money? 😄
Interesting, maybe just enjoy the money? 😄
You can check which address you received from and know whether its a tip from someone/refund/some rewards.
You can check which address you received from and know whether its a tip from someone/refund/some rewards.
credit cruz
credit cruz
yeah you can say that but what to do for the past issue it was an issue in multiple webs not just poly
yeah you can say that but what to do for the past issue it was an issue in multiple webs not just poly
Nothing to be done here tbf
Nothing to be done here tbf
probably goal was done and got cancelled later
probably goal was done and got cancelled later
ty love ya 🫡
ty love ya 🫡
Already someone got scammed don't want impersonators in here
Already someone got scammed don't want impersonators in here
Should be there in a few mins.
Should be there in a few mins.
Unclear, december bonded to 98c.
Unclear, december bonded to 98c.
Its happening
Its happening
December bonded
December bonded
wow
wow
Strike will cook
Strike will cook
I am talking May Y until 80c
I am talking May Y until 80c
The book has around 275k up to 80c. It’s definitely a sweet profit if someone knew something, but there’s nothing.
The book has around 275k up to 80c. It’s definitely a sweet profit if someone knew something, but there’s nothing.
Pls post it in <#775426315393433661> and tag Isola/Mike.
Pls post it in <#775426315393433661> and tag Isola/Mike.
99 is high, yes, but markets that are clearly going to be announced are always above 90c.
99 is high, yes, but markets that are clearly going to be announced are always above 90c.
Price really doesn't indicate something as such.
Price really doesn't indicate something as such.
Somehow some people always know what is going to happen.
Somehow some people always know what is going to happen.
Whenever something is about to happen, many people already know about it. This market cannot stay at 10c if it were going to happen today.
Whenever something is about to happen, many people already know about it. This market cannot stay at 10c if it were going to happen today.
Polymarket team very well knows that it happens on Monday and still they didn't include any waiting clause. Thats an issue from the rule writer side.
Polymarket team very well knows that it happens on Monday and still they didn't include any waiting clause. Thats an issue from the rule writer side.
Its not like Polymarket doesn't know about this thing yet they didn't include the rule clause. Same issue they have clarified thrice in favor of N. If you're arguing here argue to make better rules.
Its not like Polymarket doesn't know about this thing yet they didn't include the rule clause. Same issue they have clarified thrice in favor of N. If you're arguing here argue to make better rules.
3x for the same thing on 3 diff strikes. Still cuck?
3x for the same thing on 3 diff strikes. Still cuck?
On 1st September MS did buy BTC but didn't publish 8k form on time. There was no "announce" in rule/title mentioned. Polymarket clarified it as "N".
On 1st September MS did buy BTC but didn't publish 8k form on time. There was no "announce" in rule/title mentioned. Polymarket clarified it as "N".
For the same thing
For the same thing
Not 1 not 2 but 3x clarification.
Not 1 not 2 but 3x clarification.
They have resolved markets to N even after announcement because it came after deadline.
They have resolved markets to N even after announcement because it came after deadline.
On 1st September MicroStrategy did buy BTC, but didnt publish 8k form in time. There was no word “announce” in name of the market or rules. Despite this, market was resolved to NO —> Mustafa came this clarification: Per the market rules, "This market will resolve to 'Yes' if MicroStrategy Incorporated announces that they have acquired additional Bitcoin between the dates in the title." A qualifying announcement must be made within the market timeframe, regardless of when the actual purchase was made. Per the market rules, "This market will resolve to 'Yes' if MicroStrategy Incorporated announces that they have acquired additional Bitcoin between the dates in the title." A qualifying announcement must be made within the market timeframe, regardless of when the actual purchase was made. After that there were lots of markets which were resolved before 8k published: because all MS markets are based on announcement. Even “MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by” markets in december and March were resolved BEFORE 8k publish. If you're changing it now its a scam without the rules being updated.
On 1st September MicroStrategy did buy BTC, but didnt publish 8k form in time. There was no word “announce” in name of the market or rules. Despite this, market was resolved to NO —> Mustafa came this clarification: Per the market rules, "This market will resolve to 'Yes' if MicroStrategy Incorporated announces that they have acquired additional Bitcoin between the dates in the title." A qualifying announcement must be made within the market timeframe, regardless of when the actual purchase was made. Per the market rules, "This market will resolve to 'Yes' if MicroStrategy Incorporated announces that they have acquired additional Bitcoin between the dates in the title." A qualifying announcement must be made within the market timeframe, regardless of when the actual purchase was made. After that there were lots of markets which were resolved before 8k published: because all MS markets are based on announcement. Even “MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by” markets in december and March were resolved BEFORE 8k publish. If you're changing it now its a scam without the rules being updated.
because it came after deadline
because it came after deadline
Even though bitcoin was sold it resolved N
Even though bitcoin was sold it resolved N
Why did team clarify " This market will resolve based on announcements made made within the market's designated time frame regardless of when the actual purchases were made." 3 times for the same market then?
Why did team clarify " This market will resolve based on announcements made made within the market's designated time frame regardless of when the actual purchases were made." 3 times for the same market then?
Proposals aren't p4 say whatever. You have multiple precedents. Fine if its P2 it can go P4 then P2. But no P4 for P1.
Proposals aren't p4 say whatever. You have multiple precedents. Fine if its P2 it can go P4 then P2. But no P4 for P1.
Have better rules then
Have better rules then
Same argument
Same argument
Read this: https://discord.com/channels/718590743446290492/1456172705807204485
Read this: https://discord.com/channels/718590743446290492/1456172705807204485
there was a whole month
there was a whole month
11:59 is deadline wym no evidence that something happened until then
11:59 is deadline wym no evidence that something happened until then