该用户的聊天记录定位。
AI is surprisingly good at UI. You have to double check everything obviously, but it can get you 90% of the way there unless you're doing something crazy.
AI is surprisingly good at UI. You have to double check everything obviously, but it can get you 90% of the way there unless you're doing something crazy.
I already have a UI for what I need. Building something entirely different just for a one-off is mostly a waste of time. Even with AI you're using up credits.
I already have a UI for what I need. Building something entirely different just for a one-off is mostly a waste of time. Even with AI you're using up credits.
Now they just need to let us nickname the subaccounts and its GG.
Now they just need to let us nickname the subaccounts and its GG.
big pog
big pog
big feature
big feature
yeah I remember someone talking about it
yeah I remember someone talking about it
oh thank god you can transfer from the UI
oh thank god you can transfer from the UI
woo
woo
yeah I don't want to create a whole UI and everything for it lol
yeah I don't want to create a whole UI and everything for it lol
but to transferrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
but to transferrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
yeah
yeah
It's just annoying. It's nbd. Was hoping someone would know.
It's just annoying. It's nbd. Was hoping someone would know.
so I'd have to put something temporarily in a startup process and pull it out after I verify
so I'd have to put something temporarily in a startup process and pull it out after I verify
My program is designed to run multiple services. There's no good point to just slap in a random API call.
My program is designed to run multiple services. There's no good point to just slap in a random API call.
nah I mean the way my setup is I'd have to jankily smash it in some startup process...not really built for one-off API calls
nah I mean the way my setup is I'd have to jankily smash it in some startup process...not really built for one-off API calls
lol I guess I can try...annoying with the way my stuff is setup rn
lol I guess I can try...annoying with the way my stuff is setup rn
``` Creates a new subaccount for the authenticated user. This endpoint is currently only available to institutions and market makers. ```
``` Creates a new subaccount for the authenticated user. This endpoint is currently only available to institutions and market makers. ```
Haven't tried yet. Creating all my API endpoints and wondering if I can even use it. The docs make it sound restricted.
Haven't tried yet. Creating all my API endpoints and wondering if I can even use it. The docs make it sound restricted.
Is it restricted or can anyone create them? I have advanced tier.
Is it restricted or can anyone create them? I have advanced tier.
Do you have access to subaccounts by default or is there something special you have to do?
Do you have access to subaccounts by default or is there something special you have to do?
Anyone have any insight as to why crypto markets are consistently volatile from 10PM-11PM EST (aka rn)? Is it Asian markets?
Anyone have any insight as to why crypto markets are consistently volatile from 10PM-11PM EST (aka rn)? Is it Asian markets?
Pretty sure the total returns are correct...the other stuff not so much
Pretty sure the total returns are correct...the other stuff not so much
Is the UI on order history known to be a little janky? Seems to be missing some info when you buy and sell multiple times on the same market.
Is the UI on order history known to be a little janky? Seems to be missing some info when you buy and sell multiple times on the same market.
`get-market-candlesticks` is probably the closest you'll get to orderbook history AFAIK
`get-market-candlesticks` is probably the closest you'll get to orderbook history AFAIK
Hit the market api and run through the cursors. I know it goes back at least a couple of months. Don't think orderbook data is available.
Hit the market api and run through the cursors. I know it goes back at least a couple of months. Don't think orderbook data is available.
<@1002414905804193863> you have the most sus name for an actual mod
<@1002414905804193863> you have the most sus name for an actual mod
ty, my No buys are going through now.
ty, my No buys are going through now.
I do have the YesBid price, but not sure if I trust it at the moment 😛
I do have the YesBid price, but not sure if I trust it at the moment 😛
Yeah, but my code is all based on the pre-v2 stuff and converting it completely is not something I wanna do rn lol
Yeah, but my code is all based on the pre-v2 stuff and converting it completely is not something I wanna do rn lol
just needed to throw in a `1-NoAsk` instead here
just needed to throw in a `1-NoAsk` instead here
yes, the equiv of buying no ty
yes, the equiv of buying no ty
If I'm looking to buy at equiv of No ask price, I need to place an order with `side=ask` and price it at `1.00-.03`?
If I'm looking to buy at equiv of No ask price, I need to place an order with `side=ask` and price it at `1.00-.03`?
Think I just have this flipped.
Think I just have this flipped.
In the WS api?
In the WS api?
I'm screwing up something with the no side after switching to V2 order API. Gotta figure out where.
I'm screwing up something with the no side after switching to V2 order API. Gotta figure out where.
It's confusing because the API sends no prices lol ``` { "type": "orderbook_snapshot", "sid": 2, "seq": 2, "msg": { "market_ticker": "FED-23DEC-T3.00", "market_id": "9b0f6b43-5b68-4f9f-9f02-9a2d1b8ac1a1", "yes_dollars_fp": [ [ "0.0800", "300.00" ], [ "0.2200", "333.00" ] ], "no_dollars_fp": [ [ "0.5400", "20.00" ], [ "0.5600", "146.00" ] ] } } ```
It's confusing because the API sends no prices lol ``` { "type": "orderbook_snapshot", "sid": 2, "seq": 2, "msg": { "market_ticker": "FED-23DEC-T3.00", "market_id": "9b0f6b43-5b68-4f9f-9f02-9a2d1b8ac1a1", "yes_dollars_fp": [ [ "0.0800", "300.00" ], [ "0.2200", "333.00" ] ], "no_dollars_fp": [ [ "0.5400", "20.00" ], [ "0.5600", "146.00" ] ] } } ```
So if I wanted to buy the no side, I'd put in an ask for 9? or 91?
So if I wanted to buy the no side, I'd put in an ask for 9? or 91?
I'm asking about what should be sent to the API.
I'm asking about what should be sent to the API.
yes bid 1m is just $1
yes bid 1m is just $1
So buying a "no" should be equiv to `1m - yesBid.PriceDollars` correct? with `side=ask` assuming I'm buying top of the order book
So buying a "no" should be equiv to `1m - yesBid.PriceDollars` correct? with `side=ask` assuming I'm buying top of the order book
yeah, I'm submitting `side=ask` for "no buys", but none of them are filling
yeah, I'm submitting `side=ask` for "no buys", but none of them are filling
Most of my no orders are failing. My yes orders are fine. What should a "no" buy look like? Side = ask Price = ?? I was setting my price equiv to the "no ask", but I'm thinking I got it flipped around. ``` => OrderTrackingBackgroundService BuyNo order for KXBTCD-26JUN2519-T59899.99 Canceled. $0.0000/$3.3300 0.0000/5.0000. ```
Most of my no orders are failing. My yes orders are fine. What should a "no" buy look like? Side = ask Price = ?? I was setting my price equiv to the "no ask", but I'm thinking I got it flipped around. ``` => OrderTrackingBackgroundService BuyNo order for KXBTCD-26JUN2519-T59899.99 Canceled. $0.0000/$3.3300 0.0000/5.0000. ```
us-east-2
us-east-2
it would never lie to me
it would never lie to me
I keep refactoring half my code base so it doesn't have time to be seen.
I keep refactoring half my code base so it doesn't have time to be seen.
claude
claude
only if you're not using something dirty like python 😛
only if you're not using something dirty like python 😛
me about to commit 5 seconds ago 😅 lmao
me about to commit 5 seconds ago 😅 lmao
I must have misclicked when paging through the docs 🤦♂️
I must have misclicked when paging through the docs 🤦♂️
ty for confirming
ty for confirming
Kalshi