该用户的聊天记录定位。
At least make an announcement jesus
At least make an announcement jesus
we are in something like cancel only mode I believe
we are in something like cancel only mode I believe
yeah only canceling works for now
yeah only canceling works for now
thats bad
thats bad
but this was straight up down time during highest volume pre match period
but this was straight up down time during highest volume pre match period
cancelling now works
cancelling now works
Yeah everything is down
Yeah everything is down
<@802217872993812572> (hope tagging is allowed) you need to do something to incentivize maker volume, not penalize it. Otherwise you will just end up with latency wars on "who cancels quicker", this will never end in better liquidity/user experience for actual risk takers. You can have equivalent of maker rebate program built in easily given PP campaign running, but what we see now is inverse rebate program lol
<@802217872993812572> (hope tagging is allowed) you need to do something to incentivize maker volume, not penalize it. Otherwise you will just end up with latency wars on "who cancels quicker", this will never end in better liquidity/user experience for actual risk takers. You can have equivalent of maker rebate program built in easily given PP campaign running, but what we see now is inverse rebate program lol
Couple of weeks ago (before PP system was changed) having maker volume on active markets gave significantly more points. Now, as system has been changed, having orders open on markets with high PP per hour is the primary driver for points. It was always a big factor, but has been bumped even more as of recent. Taker volume has never really had any love, it was always an inferior way for accumulating points, but now as WC competition is tough and volumes are high, its even less rewarding. I personally find current PP system terrible and significantly worse than previously, as it incentives idle liquidity. Now the "play" for everybody is providing liquidity in a way that you **don't get filled**, just be in as much snapshots as possible, because actual periodic fills nor maker volume does not matter. I can't believe how somebody came up with this, could one imagine for example a MM bootstrapping program where MMs are incentivized to pull orders as soon as they start getting filled, lmao. So I sort of agree this system is too one sided and crippled, and will lose to Polymarkets rebate+rewards system (because what Predict currently has is just "Rewards", nothing that incentivizes being an actual maker, you seemingly even get punished for it, receiving almost zero PP), but hope this helps as an explanation.
Couple of weeks ago (before PP system was changed) having maker volume on active markets gave significantly more points. Now, as system has been changed, having orders open on markets with high PP per hour is the primary driver for points. It was always a big factor, but has been bumped even more as of recent. Taker volume has never really had any love, it was always an inferior way for accumulating points, but now as WC competition is tough and volumes are high, its even less rewarding. I personally find current PP system terrible and significantly worse than previously, as it incentives idle liquidity. Now the "play" for everybody is providing liquidity in a way that you **don't get filled**, just be in as much snapshots as possible, because actual periodic fills nor maker volume does not matter. I can't believe how somebody came up with this, could one imagine for example a MM bootstrapping program where MMs are incentivized to pull orders as soon as they start getting filled, lmao. So I sort of agree this system is too one sided and crippled, and will lose to Polymarkets rebate+rewards system (because what Predict currently has is just "Rewards", nothing that incentivizes being an actual maker, you seemingly even get punished for it, receiving almost zero PP), but hope this helps as an explanation.
just block this eclipse guy jesus lol
just block this eclipse guy jesus lol
Does not seem to be an exportable address though? It seems integrated
Does not seem to be an exportable address though? It seems integrated
but Im choosing whether to use a wallet or exchange
but Im choosing whether to use a wallet or exchange
I mean Im sure you will work something out
I mean Im sure you will work something out
Yes, I've read that, thats why am I asking, how will those points be credited to exchange users
Yes, I've read that, thats why am I asking, how will those points be credited to exchange users
Am I correct to assume 3M points campaign is accessible through exchange app as well? If so, how will those points then be credited?
Am I correct to assume 3M points campaign is accessible through exchange app as well? If so, how will those points then be credited?
The idea is if a certain underdog wins the first game and odds of its qualification reprice, 500+ backer accounts will get instantly filled. But as rewards are top heavy, whoever backed them in the first game and likely accumulated points, has a lead
The idea is if a certain underdog wins the first game and odds of its qualification reprice, 500+ backer accounts will get instantly filled. But as rewards are top heavy, whoever backed them in the first game and likely accumulated points, has a lead
So 3rd places are just getting 0$ at a group stage but participate in further reward pools?
So 3rd places are just getting 0$ at a group stage but participate in further reward pools?
I dont think the rules reference this issue
I dont think the rules reference this issue
For reference in 2016 Portugal won EURO cup after finishing 3rd in the group
For reference in 2016 Portugal won EURO cup after finishing 3rd in the group
Some teams will be in the knockout stage with fan points stopped
Some teams will be in the knockout stage with fan points stopped
Doesnt it create confusion?
Doesnt it create confusion?
I wonder whats the reasoning behind completely ignoring 3rd place qualifiers?
I wonder whats the reasoning behind completely ignoring 3rd place qualifiers?