Polymarket<@790654034112544799> can you clarify pls
<@790654034112544799> can you clarify pls
nsc参与话题 15消息总数 765
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 765 条，显示第 601-650 条could've avoided this shithousery
could've avoided this shithousery
yeah even worse.
yeah even worse.
Yes I begged their ass to clarify ahead of time.. They seem to only care when shit hits the fan <:Sadding:1306492753869537382>
Yes I begged their ass to clarify ahead of time.. They seem to only care when shit hits the fan <:Sadding:1306492753869537382>
DOG learnt TP?
DOG learnt TP?
It can be used to "extend" the market though because it causes enough ambiguity especially when this event hasnt happened in YEARS
It can be used to "extend" the market though because it causes enough ambiguity especially when this event hasnt happened in YEARS
"legal binding" <:ICANT:1389796966967414918> crine
"legal binding" <:ICANT:1389796966967414918> crine
Oh I didnt know it was a 20m market and was such a big deal
Oh I didnt know it was a 20m market and was such a big deal
it by definition is vague, its like throwing some bone to UMA they dont care about
it by definition is vague, its like throwing some bone to UMA they dont care about
crypto whales vs poly whales, who'd win?
crypto whales vs poly whales, who'd win?
I would never bet against reality especially not at 50c
I would never bet against reality especially not at 50c
people too confident in vague "precedents" via UMA
people too confident in vague "precedents" via UMA
same shit
same shit
they would because UMA is basically Poly
they would because UMA is basically Poly
would be P1
would be P1
i agree
i agree
<:BASED:1389796938513387724> tsybka
<:BASED:1389796938513387724> tsybka
PLS
PLS
gr333dy clarify pls
gr333dy clarify pls
The rules never said that market is proposable at 12 AM ET either
The rules never said that market is proposable at 12 AM ET either
was there a clarif on it or did it go to UMA and P1?
was there a clarif on it or did it go to UMA and P1?
Thats the simplest Y argument in my opinion. But I understand this December scam is directly against that
Thats the simplest Y argument in my opinion. But I understand this December scam is directly against that
Rules mention that MS sale up to May 31s will count. So it is fair to to assume that market is resolvable only after May filling is complete
Rules mention that MS sale up to May 31s will count. So it is fair to to assume that market is resolvable only after May filling is complete
But does that become precedent?
But does that become precedent?
december was a big scam imo.
december was a big scam imo.
yeah the original clarifications were dogshit. Especially when they dont have "announce" clause
yeah the original clarifications were dogshit. Especially when they dont have "announce" clause
I get that precedent is on N (off of very small markets btw)
I get that precedent is on N (off of very small markets btw)
Don't undersell the Y case please
Don't undersell the Y case please
That was never the argument for Y
That was never the argument for Y
Honestly the right way to play dis
Honestly the right way to play dis
such a disingenuous argument by N-tards
such a disingenuous argument by N-tards
you can still clarify bro
you can still clarify bro
A "litigious" individual is someone prone to unnecessarily resolving disputes through lawsuits. If you are dealing with a litigious person, de-escalation, professional boundaries, and impeccable documentation are your best defenses.
A "litigious" individual is someone prone to unnecessarily resolving disputes through lawsuits. If you are dealing with a litigious person, de-escalation, professional boundaries, and impeccable documentation are your best defenses.
are from today I think
are from today I think
litiguous woman
litiguous woman
serial plaintiff
serial plaintiff
I want him to buy June 30 sell down to 50c
I want him to buy June 30 sell down to 50c
reminds me of Microstrategy
reminds me of Microstrategy
you guys are so horny for disputes
you guys are so horny for disputes
<:ICANT:1389796966967414918>
<:ICANT:1389796966967414918>
today theres a diff insult
today theres a diff insult
Marjorie insult is from may 30
Marjorie insult is from may 30
May?
May?
are we counting AI images as insults now?
are we counting AI images as insults now?
sup
sup
yeah I think it should count, but just saying only that is a point of contention
yeah I think it should count, but just saying only that is a point of contention
yeah good question
yeah good question
that losers picture
that losers picture
I know
I know
which market? I would like to know if theres precedent on it
which market? I would like to know if theres precedent on it