if litiguous is an insult?
if litiguous is an insult?
2026-06-02 · Polymarket · 20 条相关讨论
if litiguous is an insult?
if litiguous is an insult?
Isn’t it someone who likes to sue? Idk I’m ESL
Isn’t it someone who likes to sue? Idk I’m ESL
the word itself is a normal word. just like the word loser also can be a non-insulting word. But the way trump uses it is clearly in an insulting way
the word itself is a normal word. just like the word loser also can be a non-insulting word. But the way trump uses it is clearly in an insulting way
That’s so clearly an insult to the judge and the woman
That’s so clearly an insult to the judge and the woman
trump jus insulted obama and theres not even a Jun 1 yet 💀
trump jus insulted obama and theres not even a Jun 1 yet 💀
someone should dispute https://polymarket.com/event/who-will-trump-publicly-insult-by-may-31/will-donald-trump-publicly-insult-keir-starmer-by-may-31-2026#tdTWUfcA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulaULPopSiA 3:58: “he’s very bad”, 4:30: “he’s weak Per the rules policy related “insults” count as long as they have disparaging language attached This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count. A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies. The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
someone should dispute https://polymarket.com/event/who-will-trump-publicly-insult-by-may-31/will-donald-trump-publicly-insult-keir-starmer-by-may-31-2026#tdTWUfcA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulaULPopSiA 3:58: “he’s very bad”, 4:30: “he’s weak Per the rules policy related “insults” count as long as they have disparaging language attached This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count. A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies. The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
"He's very bad on energy." "unless he can straighten out immigration where he's weak" LMAO
"He's very bad on energy." "unless he can straighten out immigration where he's weak" LMAO
“He’s weak”
“He’s weak”
you must be slow then, those comments are made based on his policy lol
you must be slow then, those comments are made based on his policy lol
Rules include policy lol
Rules include policy lol
“Policy disagreements *without* disparaging language won’t count”
“Policy disagreements *without* disparaging language won’t count”
——Without——
——Without——
Weak?
Weak?
are you retarded?
are you retarded?
weak on immigration is not an insult
weak on immigration is not an insult
Someone should dispute Starmer market!!!
Someone should dispute Starmer market!!!
He insulted him many times in may
He insulted him many times in may
weak on immigration no way thats considered an insult wtf
weak on immigration no way thats considered an insult wtf
****Negative forms******used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count.
****Negative forms******used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count.
NEGATIVE FORMS
NEGATIVE FORMS